You're right bro, he's clutch.
More clutch than Jordan ever was.
This is completely ludicrous.
The early 2000's.
So 2004-2007 is supposed to make him an HOFer?
How about admittedly quitting on his team?
He never lead anybody anywhere.
He does have the numbers though, so I guess if thats what you're going by sure....ALTHOUGH, I see that "He was putting up good numbers on a bad team", ******** reasoning used in here regularly....so idk why it wouldnt apply to Vince.
Vince's prime was from 04-07.
These are the 14 prime performers from that span. Which 3 would you remove to put Vince on?
Prime Vince is better than the top 5 SGs right now.
no. Vince's best year was 04-05.
He averaged 27.5, 6 rebounds and 5 assists.
01 was close, when he put up 27.6, 6 rebounds and 4 assists?
And real young? Child please.
but sure, we can go to 01
It's alot of ****** goofies in here.