OFFICIAL 2013 FANTASY FOOTBALL TALK

^ I REALLY like Reggie this year. I honestly think I'd take him over Forte. I'd definitely take Sproles over both of em.
 
would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft
 
Last edited:
^ That's perfectly fine imo. There's plenty of viable WRs to be had from round 4 and on.
 
A lot of dudes really high on Bush this year.

Where do you guys think Bush and Sproles should be drafted in a .5 PPR league?
 
would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft

Having good to great wide receivers is overrated in fantasy to me.
 
would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft
Having good to great wide receivers is overrated in fantasy to me.
same to me but you still have to consider that its PPR
 
would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft

heck no, RB's are very thin this year in Fantasy
 
would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft
Having good to great wide receivers is overrated in fantasy to me.
In my 16 team standard scoring league, if I went RB-RB-RB, what WR should I target in round 4-6 (picks 52,77,84)
 
would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft


Having good to great wide receivers is overrated in fantasy to me.
In my 16 team standard scoring league, if I went RB-RB-RB, what WR should I target in round 4-6 (picks 52,77,84)

Cecil Short, Tavon Austin, Greg Jennings, Deandre Hopkins, Kenbrell Thompkins are all I can think of at the moment. Possibly Torrey Smith at #52?
 
would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft


Having good to great wide receivers is overrated in fantasy to me.


same to me but you still have to consider that its PPR

Don't matter.

There is always going to be decent WRs available in rounds 4-6 especially in PPR.
 
would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft

Having good to great wide receivers is overrated in fantasy to me.
In my 16 team standard scoring league, if I went RB-RB-RB, what WR should I target in round 4-6 (picks 52,77,84)
Cecil Short, Tavon Austin, Greg Jennings, Deandre Hopkins, Kenbrell Thompkins are all I can think of at the moment. Possibly Torrey Smith at #52?
What the earliest you'd take Thompkins??

I'm thinking in the TY Hilton range 
nerd.gif
 
^ That's perfectly fine imo. There's plenty of viable WRs to be had from round 4 and on.

really? i was thinking of doing that as well but not too familiar with WRs after the big names. might go with 2 RBs then 2 WRs but no idea yet, im scared :lol:

i had Cruz and AJ green last year at my WR
 
Keeper league question...get to keep 3 players, no penalties, so doesn't matter in that aspect, 10 team league, snake I pick 5, so picks 5, 16, 25 opens for me...

Current keepers - Ray Rice, Calvin Johnson, Andre Johnson - letting back into pool - Peyton, Daryl Richardson, Tate, H Nicks

I was just offered my second round pick for Trent Richardson...am I over thinking this and should jump on that??? (over thinkin his injuries last year and the fact he plays on Cleveland)...if I did thus I would of course drop Andre

If I didn't make the trade based on other teams needs ahead I'd go Ridley at 5 and then something either Wilson/Lacey/Gore pick 16 then D rich or best wr in the 3rd...bare in mind Wrs like D Thomas, julio and others are going back into the pool, it's jus Andre is the clear no 1 and wil get 100 catches if healthy


If I take t rich, I'd still go Ridley at 5 and be looking at Rice, Richardson, Ridley and Calvin...don't pick again until 25 but I could go WR and try to get D rich on the come back before grabbing a Ryan/staff/luck...

Any thoughts and am I over thinkin this and pull the trigger toget t rich?
 
I wouldn't take him over Forte. I wouldn't take neither Bush or Sproles over Forte.
me either.  this is hype at its finest.  dont get me wrong , i really like bush but not over forte. stafford wont be checking down as much with megatron in game. in a ppr starting to lean bush over spoles because he will be in many more snaps than spoles who shares the backfield more.  in a 12 team league having pick 9 , 10 , 11 , or 12 and starting off with dez and bush  or a forte bush start does peak my interest. 
smokin.gif
 
I wouldn't take him over Forte. I wouldn't take neither Bush or Sproles over Forte.
me either.  this is hype at its finest.  dont get me wrong , i really like bush but not over forte. stafford wont be checking down as much with megatron in game. in a ppr starting to lean bush over spoles because he will be in many more snaps than spoles who shares the backfield more.  in a 12 team league having pick 9 , 10 , 11 , or 12 and starting off with dez and bush  or a forte bush start does peak my interest. 
smokin.gif

that's what im hoping for. or hoping he falls to the end of the 2nd. this performance didn't help, though. :lol:
 
would it be stupid to take 3 RBs in the first 3 rounds in a ppr league? my league has 2 wr, 2 rb, 1flex so i can start 3 rbs. really considering going RB1( whoevers there at that spot), reggie, then sproles. or is that too much of a reach and im risking too much by not taking a WR? its a 10 man league so im guessing there would be a lot of left over WR later in the draft



Having good to great wide receivers is overrated in fantasy to me.
In my 16 team standard scoring league, if I went RB-RB-RB, what WR should I target in round 4-6 (picks 52,77,84)


Cecil Short, Tavon Austin, Greg Jennings, Deandre Hopkins, Kenbrell Thompkins are all I can think of at the moment. Possibly Torrey Smith at #52?
What the earliest you'd take Thompkins??

I'm thinking in the TY Hilton range 
nerd.gif

He was going in the last round or 2 in some of my practice drafts, but after tonights performance he will probably go a lot earlier. Wanted him late in my main money league the other day but someone took him early as hell >:
 
Back
Top Bottom