- 57,138
- 60,132
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
Lexcorp stealing Zod's body is plain ridiculous.
DC Studios THREAD - GunnVerse Begins - Chapter ONE: Gods & Monsters
- 73,114
- 59,877
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
Not really ridiculous, Lex can easily do that in the comics. Hell Lex was once a US president in the books, his resources are unlimited.
- 57,138
- 60,132
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
In the books.
- 6,565
- 647
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2007
^^ RFX. Dopest Avy on NT 
- 14,106
- 6,328
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2004
Stealing a body isn't a stretch.
- 73,114
- 59,877
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
So? All these characters are based on the books why would be ridiculous on film?
It's no more ridiculous than a man building an iron suit or his colleague having him kidnapped.
Lex having government contract and owning a bunch of businesses and building in Metropolis and one of the richest and smartest man in the world can't have access to an alien body?
He could easily own Star Labs who the government have the alien body experimented on or the government could just contract LexCorp to do it themselves.
Not really sure what makes it ridiculous as if it is out of the realms of possibility in these films.
- 57,138
- 60,132
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
Correct
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
Lex having access to an alien body isn't really ridiculous. What's really ridiculous is an alien growing up in a farm and uses his godlike powers to be a reporter and the only difference between his alter egos are glasses.
If you choose to buy the latter you should be able to buy the former.
If you choose to buy the latter you should be able to buy the former.
- 57,138
- 60,132
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
Ridiculous as well, but haven't they been running with that forever?
Moheezy
formerly mizzoe33
- 10,923
- 8,785
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
well said.
- 73,114
- 59,877
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
Explain why?
Seriously, out of all the comic book fans and those who posts and watches all these films you have the worst imagination ever. You always question all the reports even the ones that are easy to explain like why Bats would have more than one vehicle. :x
I'd call it immediate DC hate but then you'd just refute that with some ridiculous excuse.
I even explain possible ways he could easily do it and it is very believable in that world yet you still find it ridiculous.
Last edited:
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
Yea, it's really weird to get hung up on a random detail like that, that's not even far - fetched lol
- 57,138
- 60,132
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
Believe what you believe, I believe what I believe. Stop getting butthurt everytime I say something about this film you don't like. Notice how I don't care about your uber-optimism about this film, yet you seem to rise up on every opportunity when I mention something I don't like.Explain why?
Seriously, out of all the comic book fans and those who posts and watches all these films you have the worst imagination ever. You always question all the reports even the ones that are easy to explain like why Bats would have more than one vehicle.
I'd call it immediate DC hate but then you'd just refute that with some ridiculous excuse.
I even explain possible ways he could easily do it and it is very believable in that world yet you still find it ridiculous.
I don't care for Gal Gadot's acting.
I still don't believe this is the route they should've went
Get over it
Call it DC hate all you want. You have no reason for even saying that.
- 57,138
- 60,132
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
Ya'll making it seem like I said that will absolutely ruin the film
- 73,114
- 59,877
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
No one is butthurt here, it just baffles me how deep the hate is and how blinded you are by it.
I mean it is a minute/small detail yet you find it ridiculous? You can't see a reason how he could do it? Even after example from the books it is still ridiculous? You can't see it translating to films?
And if I rise up every time someone says something stupid about DC then I'd be here posting every minute but when the most ridiculous thing comes up like questioning a minute detail, it makes me wonder how someone could not understand it outside of utter hate for the brand.
Again you question every little detail that it really is just laughable to not even admit the hate for the brand/film already. I can understand not trusting Gadots acting or the casting, whatever but for a small detail that isn't far fetch at all and calling it ridiculous?
Why don't you get over it and stop complaining about the film? You aren't even critiquing just to critique, you are just picking it apart for no apparent reason and are blinded to explanations. I mean if you aren't going to read or take any answers to why something you find ridiculous might work then why bother posting in the thread? Again, you couldn't understand why Batman would use more than one vehicle in the film, you are questions the number of vehicles Batman would use. Seriously?
I mean it is a minute/small detail yet you find it ridiculous? You can't see a reason how he could do it? Even after example from the books it is still ridiculous? You can't see it translating to films?
And if I rise up every time someone says something stupid about DC then I'd be here posting every minute but when the most ridiculous thing comes up like questioning a minute detail, it makes me wonder how someone could not understand it outside of utter hate for the brand.
Again you question every little detail that it really is just laughable to not even admit the hate for the brand/film already. I can understand not trusting Gadots acting or the casting, whatever but for a small detail that isn't far fetch at all and calling it ridiculous?
Why don't you get over it and stop complaining about the film? You aren't even critiquing just to critique, you are just picking it apart for no apparent reason and are blinded to explanations. I mean if you aren't going to read or take any answers to why something you find ridiculous might work then why bother posting in the thread? Again, you couldn't understand why Batman would use more than one vehicle in the film, you are questions the number of vehicles Batman would use. Seriously?
- 87,735
- 50,125
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
And Lex getting alien DNA and specifically the bodies of dead or living kryptonians has been a plot for Superman stories forever.
Can't judge a story when you read some plot points about it out of context.
Last edited:
- 57,138
- 60,132
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
I don't see how it's hate. I didn't even hate the first film. Just meh. Since this bothers you so much, I'll drop it.No one is butthurt here, it just baffles me how deep the hate is and how blinded you are by it.
I mean it is a minute/small detail yet you find it ridiculous? You can't see a reason how he could do it? Even after example from the books it is still ridiculous? You can't see it translating to films?
And if I rise up every time someone says something stupid about DC then I'd be here posting every minute but when the most ridiculous thing comes up like questioning a minute detail, it makes me wonder how someone could not understand it outside of utter hate for the brand.
Again you question every little detail that it really is just laughable to not even admit the hate for the brand/film already. I can understand not trusting Gadots acting or the casting, whatever but for a small detail that isn't far fetch at all and calling it ridiculous?
Why don't you get over it and stop complaining about the film? You aren't even critiquing just to critique, you are just picking it apart for no apparent reason and are blinded to explanations. I mean if you aren't going to read or take any answers to why something you find ridiculous might work then why bother posting in the thread? Again, you couldn't understand why Batman would use more than one vehicle in the film, you are questions the number of vehicles Batman would use. Seriously?
And I asked why he would need more than one suit and batmobile for speculative reasons, you just assumed I had something negative to say.
Last edited:
- 57,138
- 60,132
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
Fair enough.
- 87,735
- 50,125
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
Just to argue against my own point I will say it varies.
If it was a plot point like Lex Luthor gets outsmarted by Jimmy Olsen then feel free to **** all over it.
- 57,138
- 60,132
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
I mean it's cool. Since I'm being painted as the hate DC guy already, I'll just go with whatever is given. If it happened in the books, cool. I'm wrong then.
Last edited:
- 5,132
- 843
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2003
- 73,114
- 59,877
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
- 16,421
- 2,164
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2012
Have these guys ran out of ideas? After a hiatus of what seemed like a year they do 2 videos and a video for a teaser?
- 16,421
- 2,164
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2012
What's Supes deal with the clone other than Supes being a *****?
