Legit check Air Jordan 1 Royal 2013

TIMMYBRIXXX said:
Yes.. Im a designer, its what i do..Dude its called a brand!! An a TRADEMARK or LOGO. An for that reason ITS ALWAYS THE SAME... Do you know anything about design?? How many times you went to FootLocker and seen a diff font on the door? How many times you been to Mc Donalds and seen a diff font and archs? Or WALMART how many times have you seen it written different on the side of the store??? Or Glock, How many times have you seen their guns w a diff logo? I could go on and on...Get my point. You act like people are sewing the tags by hand or something bro! Its a machine, and its 99% accurate IMO. To see a tag this different is a big red flag these days! Its not a defect. 

To think that a Corp such as NIKE would have multiple variants of there logo on the same shoe is just redic IMO.. 

Tags can change on diff shoes in the line for sure like an OG 1 vs a New 1 the OG has the "R"s but its the same NIKE letters for sure!
Click to expand...
That is not to say that it doesn't happen and that it don't exist. Unless we both have seen every 2013 Air Jordan 1 Royal out there worldwide and seen with our own eyes all the flaws that pass through "Quality Control" at Nike. We really can't say 100% we know for sure. Still just speculation unless we know for certain. 
 
REALEYEZ said:
Actually some don't. I have held many in my hand that are slipped out the back by known Nike reps. Also, the dates vary depending on production and from what warehouse. The dates on the 2013 Royals ALL start with a 9/. The day itself is irellevant as long as the date is correct. Anyhow, the shoes look on point.

Elaborate a lil with some solid facts as to why these are fake in your opinion?
Click to expand...
1 of my royal production date is 8/20 /13
 
wangster288 said:
He saying all the royal start with 9/. So thats wrong
Click to expand...
Yeah your right. My point is the DAYS the shoes were made are irrelevant. From my experience, the ACTUAL DATE is what matters because the days are usually different and i have seen a whole lot of 2013 Royal 1's start with 9. 
 
Zyzz said:
dont see how production date is wrong..
Click to expand...
Yeah. The production date is fine on these shoes. Now I can see if the date was 3 months ahead or, 3 months behind. But no. It is the month of September (9) on these shoes in the pics as a whole lot of 2013 Royal 1's were made on the 9th month (Sept.).
 
REALEYEZ said:
That is not to say that it doesn't happen and that it don't exist. Unless we both have seen every 2013 Air Jordan 1 Royal out there worldwide and seen with our own eyes all the flaws that pass through "Quality Control" at Nike. We really can't say 100% we know for sure. Still just speculation unless we know for certain. 
Click to expand...
obviously you are not understanding what im saying.. Ill try to explain again..

Lets say its a factory making business cards.. After i print and cut a million of them some will be flawed for sure.. ie- bad cuts, bad print HOWEVER all will be consistent. Because they are made from a master.. Out of a million cards the font and size WILL NOT change or vary in any way shape or form.
 
REALEYEZ said:
Yeah. The production date is fine on these shoes. Now I can see if the date was 3 months ahead or, 3 months behind. But no. It is the month of September (9) on these shoes in the pics as a whole lot of 2013 Royal 1's were made on the 9th month (Sept.).
Click to expand...
Bro you seem to think these counterfeiters are idiots. As I stated before, The fake game has changed..You keep talking about the fakes from years ago with dates that wrong etc. These fakes are next level.

Well lets just say outta about 60 pr of ROYAL 1s we have seen in the last 3 months with the prod dates 9/13 and 11/28 have ALL been 100% FAKE.. Are there real ones out there with this date? Possibly.. IDK but we have yet to see them here.
 
Last edited:
this is not a production error, Its an entirely different mold. Made to look like the authentic mold.. Its very close, but has flaws.
 
REALEYEZ, I hate to agree with Timmy, but he's correct. So just stop. These sneakers are fake. 
 
TIMMYBRIXXX said:
 
this is not a production error, Its an entirely different mold. Made to look like the authentic mold.. Its very close, but has flaws.
Click to expand...
ummm you ARE aware that molds change right?

even early samples change from production releases...these really release pairs are just that.
 
ninjahood said:
 
ummm you ARE aware that molds change right?

even early samples change from production releases...these really release pairs are just that.
Click to expand...
Ninja I love you and your realm of knowledge but you are so far down that GM path there is no bringing you back man.. believe what you want and ill do the same. Lets just agree to disagree.
 
lmao  "early pairs"  but then has a later prod. date than the release day ones
 
Last edited:
Is anyone failing to see that the box tag is placed flush with the bottom of the box when it should be right above the red
 
theyre fake, i got screwed with a pair exactly like these off ebay.. got my money back though. the border around the size tag is off.. it's too thin. should be a thicker white border.. close to what the size tag itself is like. the blue looks good in certain light, but it's actually a really dull/close to purple-ish shade of blue, nowhere close to royal blue.
 
lol wow! totally forgot about this thread after passing on these a while back. but on the real. how about these? legit check please!

the seller didnt show the box size but, its "9.5" so the sellers says.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Help LC Jordan 1 not for resale
Replies
0
Views
262
cero
C
K
Concord 11 legit check
Replies
0
Views
679
KnowTheLedge
K
C
L/C air Jordan 4 military black
Replies
0
Views
640
ceelos96
C
nycsneakerhead
Jordan 1 Travis Scott Mocha High - does this stitching mean it is fake?
Replies
4
Views
1K
Quiggles706
Quiggles706
dant10
Jordan 4 bred 2019 legit check!
Replies
0
Views
852
dant10
dant10

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom