2013-2014 NBA Thread - IND @ WAS and OKC @ LAC on ESPN

Status
Not open for further replies.
IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW YOU GET THE POINTS.
laugh.gif


There are no style points.

Dwight with his 3 post moves is good for 18 points a game and a consistent double team. I'll take that over Lamarcus any day.
That's fine, then don't compare their FG% when they play a completely different style
 
Patrick is already a crazy guy but that nappy hair cut just make him look more like a crazy crack head lol
 
Klay and Parsons though, that's funny. I think dude was serious to, was that you @do work son, or you just asked the follow up question?
 
Any player in the league is going to shoot a lower % when he takes mostly jumpshots compared to a player who stays in the paint.

How often is Howard shooting fade-away 18 footers?  Comparing their FG% is a little ridiculous.

Diandre Jordan led the league in FG% this year. Think about that for a minute.  This is a guy who air balls free throws on a consistent basis

IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW YOU GET THE POINTS. :lol:

There are no style points.

Dwight with his 3 post moves is good for 18 points a game and a consistent double team. I'll take that over Lamarcus any day.

In today's analytic NBA, how do people not understand this.
 
I just wanna see Beverly vs Westbrook in the playoffs this year.  That's my #1 wish right next to wanting the Clippers to make an early exit
 
Any fans of Hoop Dreams, should watch Hoop Dreams part 2.

It basically follows Beverly during his high school years... With Arthur Agee trying to profit off him and the films name lol.
 
Hope Lillard is alright but this situation is so similar to Rose. Getting injured in the 1st round after signing a big deal with adidas? Hope he's alright.
 
That's fine, then don't compare their FG% when they play a completely different style

Of course you, how else would you know who was the more efificent scorer.

Dwight shoots 45% in the post.

Lamarcus shoots 39% in the post.


Per synergy.

That is an apples to apples comparison, the ultimate point is that it doens't matter how you get the points, people have this idea that Dwight needs 50 moves, he doesn't, having more moves doesn't mean a more effective post game.
 
:wow: at there being a Hoops Dreams 2?

Lilliard better not be hurt

Yup. I think it's called Hoop Reality. Not really a good film, still interesting.. And gives you a background to Beverly' life.

Plus it's always fun to see Arthur Agee. Especially him in his late 30s early 40s.
 
 
That's fine, then don't compare their FG% when they play a completely different style
Of course you, how else would you know who was the more efificent scorer.

Dwight shoots 45% in the post.

Lamarcus shoots 39% in the post.


Per synergy.

That is an apples to apples comparison, the ultimate point is that it doens't matter how you get the points, people have this idea that Dwight needs 50 moves, he doesn't, having more moves doesn't mean a more effective post game.
Yea comparing the in the post stats is totally fine.

it seemed like people were just comparing their overall FG% as a way of saying who was a better offensive player, which is what i did not agree with
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom