2013-2014 NBA Thread - IND @ WAS and OKC @ LAC on ESPN

Status
Not open for further replies.
 
if it was up to me lakers, knicks, bulls or celtics would win every year unless a small market team can put together greatness (see spurs, 90s rockets)

sucks that all these small market trash owners had to cry about everything and change up the CBA

this bum dan gilbert crying gets the rules changed to make him feel better, multiple first picks and his team is still trash

cant even call the cavs trash, if trash and garbage had a child, that child would cry at the sight of the cleveland cavs




realest post in this thread

damn :pimp: :lol:
 
dat no look 
smokin.gif


is the other pg also 4'3?

"and kendall marshall checking in"

inb4 aquille carr vs seth curry debate
 
Marshall with 32 assists to four turnovers in his last two. :smokin

The Nuggets had five players with 17+ points (and two more in double figures). :lol:
 
Marshal better start even after farmar or blake comes back

I rather have them start him and develop young talent/tank then play guys already at their ceiling and still lose
 
I hate the fact that Nate Robinson got a garbage 2 year deal after playing so well for the Bulls. 

Now he is playing great again, but when it is time to re-up his contract he still probably won't get a good deal because teams won't think he will be able to continue to produce at a high level because he is pushing 30. 

I feel for you Nate!
 
i never understood why lakers didnt try to sign nate during the off season , he has such a low contract 4million isnt it ? he is one of the only players that plays good both as starter and from the bench 
 
Damn smh I wish I could give lil Aquille my 6'3 frame I do nothing with
 
Add me to the camp of people who don't care where the good teams are. As long as I can see good teams and good players, small market v. big market is irrelevant to me. But for the record, last time I checked, the Clippers still play in LA and don't suck. And San Francisco is a pretty big market and the Warriors are doing fine.
 
im a fan of nate (when he was a W's) but there's a reason you dont give him a long term deal. he is too inconsistent and plays zero defense. can shoot you into a gm, but lets not forget he can also shoot you out of one more times that not. i do think he earned a multi year deal after his play from chicago. it was understandable for the bulls not to retain him since rose was suppose to be back and they had heinrich backing that spot up and teague is still under contract
 
Man no ones checking for the Clippers :lol:
And unless you guys trade for melo, enjoy the next 3-5 years of first and second round exits. Which at the end of the day is the same damn thing the Lakers will be doing :smh:

And I don't even mean to sound like a **** but it's true, cp3 ain't enough, too small, too easy to focus in on for a series.
And Blake Griffin isn't good enough imo to get that team over the hump.

You make that trade, you get reliant scorer in the fourth, and someone cp3 can trust in the post and hit free throws.

Cp3 and BG is 1st and 2nd round exits next 3-5 :lol:
Cp3 and melo? At least conference finals to finals.
 
Last edited:
^melo as a number 2 would be the best for him as well
highly doubt sterling gives up blake
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom