California is considering making it alot easier (and cheaper) to get 4 year college degree

70,049
24,221
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
[h1]Proposal would let California's 2-year colleges grant 4-year degrees[/h1][h2]A 16-member panel is considering the controversial proposal, which would require legislation authorizing junior colleges to grant baccalaureate degrees.[/h2]

  • [table][tr][td]
    [table][tr][td][/td][td][/td][td]
    Email
    [/td][td][/td][/tr][/table]
    [/td][td]
    [table][tr][td]
    [table][tr][td][/td][td][/td][td]
    Share
    [/td][td][/td][/tr][/table]
    [/td][td]
    511
    [/td][/tr][/table]
    [/td][td][/td][td][/td][/tr][/table]

[table][tr][td]
599

A panel considering a controversial proposal to allow California’s two-year schools to offer four-year degrees is scheduled to present a report to community colleges Chancellor Brice Harris and the Board of Governors by year’s end. Above, Harris at a news conference last year. (Rich Pedroncelli, Associated Press / September 27, 2012)
[/td][/tr][/table]

By Carla Rivera
October 14, 2013, 9:01 p.m.

California's community college system is considering a controversial effort to offer four-year degrees, a move designed to boost the number of students who graduate and are more prepared for the workforce.

The change would require legislation authorizing junior colleges to grant baccalaureate degrees. Colleges would also need to seek additional accreditation as baccalaureate-granting institutions. Supporters argue that it would help to address shortages in workforce training and benefit students in rural areas without access to a four-year university.

But critics, including some community college faculty and officials from four-year universities, counter that it would represent a dramatic shift from the traditional mission of the two-year system. They point to the state's 1960 Master Plan for Higher Education, which designated community colleges as open-for-all campuses for career and transfer students. The four-year universities were to focus on research and higher degrees.

A 16-member panel, appointed by community colleges Chancellor Brice Harris, is weighing the move. The group includes administrators, faculty, a student, a college trustee and representatives from the University of California and California State University systems.

If adopted, California would follow a growing trend: As many as 21 states have approved baccalaureate programs at community colleges, most recently Michigan, which in December granted junior colleges authority to offer four-year degrees in a limited number of fields such as maritime technology and culinary arts.

But most of the efforts have met fierce political resistance from universities and private colleges concerned about competition for students as well as duplication of programs. The battle in California, with 112 community colleges and 2.4 million students, is likely to be just as intense.

A 2005 state law authorized partnerships between two- and four-year schools to offer baccalaureate degrees on community college campuses. College of the Canyons, for example, partners with Cal State campuses in Los Angeles, Bakersfield and Northridge, as well as private institutions such as the University of La Verne and Brandman University that offer bachelor's degrees in liberal arts, engineering and other majors on its Santa Clarita campus.

But legislative attempts to establish stand-alone bachelor's programs have failed.

"The intent … is to look at the issue from all sides," said Barry Russell, the community colleges' vice chancellor for academic affairs. "We have people in the group who think it's a peachy keen idea and we should start doing it next week. But also people who are wary and looking at the implications of changing the mission of community colleges."

The panel is scheduled to present a report to Harris and the Board of Governors by year's end.

Major questions include the costs of baccalaureate programs and how high fees would be set. Colleges would also probably need to increase faculty with the credentials, such as a doctorate degree, needed to teach upper division course work as well as upgrade libraries and laboratories.

Many wonder how a system forced by budget cuts to slash classes and turn away more than 500,000 traditional students would handle the increased demands imposed by baccalaureate programs.

Faculty, too, want more of those questions answered, said Beth Smith, president of the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges.

"We want to continue to address our original mission as well as we can before we tackle new ways to serve students," said Smith, a math professor at Grossmont College in El Cajon. "It doesn't mean there aren't important reasons to investigate this topic. It's a challenge for us because the situation of our students has changed, particularly in the case of career technical programs and nursing, where an associate's degree used to lead to employment, and that's no longer the case."

Cal State and UC officials said maintaining their respective roles is the best way to serve students.

"Cal State, UC and community colleges work together on a regular basis and we'd like to continue that," said Christine Mallon, assistant vice chancellor for academic programs and faculty development at Cal State and a member of the panel. "We should continue making use of the infrastructure, faculty and resources and continue finishing degrees started in community colleges."

Education experts said it's a tricky balance but that community college bachelor's programs can help fill needs specific to local communities such as nursing, automotive and biotechnology.

"Provided they are offering bachelor's degrees that other public institutions aren't offering, particularly in applied technical areas," said Davis Jenkins, senior research associate at the Community College Research Center at Columbia University's Teachers College.

"In general it doesn't depart from the community college mission because they were designed to meet community needs."

State Sen. Marty Block (D-San Diego) noted that Cal State lobbied and won legislative approval to offer doctoral degrees in education, physical therapy and nursing, despite arguments from UC and others against "mission creep."

Block proposed a pilot program in 2011 authorizing the Grossmont-Cuyamaca and San Mateo County community districts to offer selective bachelor's degrees where workforce needs are high. Students would pay regular community college fees for the first two years and a to-be-determined higher fee for the upper division courses. He pulled that proposal because of budget concerns.

"Times have changed and we have a small surplus," Block said. "As the education budget chair in the Senate, I think I can find pools of funding. The need has grown so great that private sector employers now have said they may be willing to offer money for start-up. It gives me hopes that a similar bill this time would be successful."

Such legislation would be a boost to San Diego City College nursing students, said Debbie Berg, associate dean and director of nursing programs. Most of the 63 students who graduated as registered nurses in May want to pursue a bachelor's degree, she said.

The closest institution, San Diego State, enrolled 42 registered nurses in its bachelor's degree program this fall, with 14 from City College, Berg said. Students are trying to enroll in other Cal State campuses, but most have too few spaces, she said. Meanwhile, tuition to complete a nursing degree at private colleges can run $50,000 to $90,000.

Jonathan Bills was one of the lucking 14 who got a spot at San Diego State. After graduating in May, he encountered the problem faced by many of his classmates: An associate's degree isn't enough for a profession that increasingly demands a bachelor's.

"If I had a choice," he said, "it would be no other decision than to stay and get the bachelor's" at San Diego City College.

carla.rivera@latimes.com

Copyright [emoji]169[/emoji] 2013, Los Angeles Times

http://www.latimes.com/local/le-me-college-degrees-20131015,0,3511251.story
 
Hell naw whats in it for me?

Im already under 15k debt and theses suckas just get to go to CC and get a 4 year degree? nahh
 
Thts the least California could do since we're about to make it legal to give ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS a form of license to drive . like seriously tf kinda sense does tht make .
 
The idea that it may want more people to go to school sounds good, but easier said than done if it does go into effect.
 
Thts the least California could do since we're about to make it legal to give ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS a form of license to drive . like seriously tf kinda sense does tht make .

what is the problem with this? Please inform me.

I think it makes a lot of sense but I would love to hear your position on it.
 
I'm busting my *** in a 4-year for my bachelors..

The principle of this just rustles my jimmies.

I'm STEM though. No way they're handing out STEM degrees for 2 years of work.
 
Last edited:
Thts the least California could do since we're about to make it legal to give ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS a form of license to drive . like seriously tf kinda sense does tht make .
cmon, i guess you never knew of people that were driving without license just to get to work another day (no office condintion) just triyin to survive another day, being afraid of getting stop. They have many things to worry about, but driving shouldnt be one of them. 
 
How would tuition work? I think it's good but if employers look at the school you went to some my look down upon this. Just my thoughts
 
Thts the least California could do since we're about to make it legal to give ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS a form of license to drive . like seriously tf kinda sense does tht make .
cmon, i guess you never knew of people that were driving without license just to get to work another day (no office condintion) just triyin to survive another day, being afraid of getting stop. They have many things to worry about, but driving shouldnt be one of them. 

eff all that. It ain't even entirely ALL about that. Don't get me wrong, it is a major factor but most importantly if they're not criminals chances are they're just hard working people contributing to our society and paying taxes. They're the same people who's children are fighting for our country overseas, doing the jobs others won't and attempting to live a good life while being able to provide for their family.
 
what is the problem with this? Please inform me.

I think it makes a lot of sense but I would love to hear your position on it.

illegally here in the states without any documentation thereof. mind you I live in Los Angeles, CA and I find it very peculiar tht our state is basically saying "Okay we both know your not supposed to be here but since you here and we both know your gonna drive we'll js give you a substitute license." I think instead of tht they should help whoever wants to come here by creating a better process to get their papers instead of trying to justify the situation and cause more illegal immigrants to come.


cmon, i guess you never knew of people that were driving without license just to get to work another day (no office condintion) just triyin to survive another day, being afraid of getting stop. They have many things to worry about, but driving shouldnt be one of them. 
I have no problem helping out your family and putting your loved ones in a better position in life . but I do have a problem with being in a hit and run accident and seeing hit and runs. people getting killed and tht same guy who wanted to feed his family js killed the father and husband to a family and took off . immediately taking the car to get the dents fixed and the car painted like nothing happened . tht I believe we can all agree on his shameful to say the least . not even saying tht only illegal immigrants commit hit and runs but it's a fact tht in California most hit and runs are committed by illegal immigrants . 48% of all crashes in California are hit and runs btw . ******g half !

in California you can take the train/bus . the metrolink is a very reliable transportation . you will never be late ! I js think if your gonna be here illegally you should think about even the everyday small things before you go out and do them . you know?
 
Last edited:
what is the problem with this? Please inform me.

I think it makes a lot of sense but I would love to hear your position on it.

illegally here in the states without any documentation thereof. mind you I live in Los Angeles, CA and I find it very peculiar tht our state is basically saying "Okay we both know your not supposed to be here but since you here and we both know your gonna drive we'll js give you a substitute license." I think instead of tht they should help whoever wants to come here by creating a better process to get their papers instead of trying to justify the situation and cause more illegal immigrants to come.


cmon, i guess you never knew of people that were driving without license just to get to work another day (no office condintion) just triyin to survive another day, being afraid of getting stop. They have many things to worry about, but driving shouldnt be one of them. 
I have no problem helping out your family and putting your loved ones in a better position in life . but I do have a problem with being in a hit and run accident and seeing hit and runs. people getting killed and tht same guy who wanted to feed his family js killed the father and husband to a family and took off . immediately taking the car to get the dents fixed and the car painted like nothing happened . tht I believe we can all agree on his shameful to say the least . not even saying tht only illegal immigrants commit hit and runs but it's a fact tht in California most hit and runs are committed by illegal immigrants . 48% of all crashes in California are hit and runs btw . ******g half !

ok, let's not justify them being here than. How about they no longer pay taxes? Btw, the "better process to get their papers" has almost been pushed through multiple times. Everytime it get's pushed aside by big events such as 9/11 etc.

as for the second part, you basically don't want them to get a license because of a hypothetical situation in your mind? In that case I think people with the username "Travis" should be kicked out of this country because they're posts are mean and senseless. This one time he was walking home from school and accidentally tripped another kid walking breaking his leg and shattering his dream of going to college on a sports scholarship.
 
The idea that it may want more people to go to school sounds good, but easier said than done if it does go into effect.
just by da sense in this thread i can see a hint of elitism....

there's gonna be a TON of private colleges throwing w/e they can to make sure this doesn't happen...
 
back to the college topic. Allow me to bring up a point.

Pre 1960's and still up to the 70's and some of the 80's, only the elite high school students went to college. The ones with a high GPA, parents who had the ability to pay for college, and were in the position to do went. Most student's went to a vocational if anything. Learned a trade and joined the workforce whether it be mechanic, construction worker, etc. College at one point was for the elite students to go and further their education and learn things nobody could to get jobs nobody could. Nowadays rich kids from high school will get into most colleges with a 2.0 or higher GPA. If they're at a 3.0 Average then chances are they're going wherever they want if they have money. No more trade school for them. People such as myself who really didn't do all that great in high school go to a community college and some like me to a 4 year. It's the reason a college education is no longer so special and the reason our high schools have been failing.
 
just by da sense in this thread i can see a hint of elitism....

there's gonna be a TON of private colleges throwing w/e they can to make sure this doesn't happen...

I have to disagree. In the surface, policies that make a bachelors degree easier to obtain seem like they would benefit middle and working class Californians. However, the empirical evidence has shown that as this State has made a bachelors degree more and more commonplace, the more that college fails to benefit the best and brightest of the State's working class students.

As California has increased the number of students who attain a bachelors degree, the cost of that education has gone up and the value of those degrees has declined. When you keep down the number of students and combine that with meritorious admissions policies, you are able to grant degrees to students, whose parents are, those student get a well respected degree and have little or no student debt.

We tried that very model in California after World War II and it worked. Our State's grand experiment with accessible higher education for the poor but scholarly youth played a role in the rise of California's grand middle and upper middle class.

Some time in the 1980's, a variety of factors conspired and started an over expansion of the State's Higher Education System. the results have been increasingly unmarketable degrees and escalating costs to students and taxpayers.

Turning Community Colleges into public degree mills only accelerates that unfortunate trend and the end result is that everyone will have a bachelors degree and the only people getting good jobs are people with rich parents and/or Stanford, USC, UCLA and Cal degrees. That would be the very situation our State sought to avoid. We do not want an East Coast style system where only the folks with Ivy League Credentials have opportunities.
 
In my experience there is ZERO difference between the quality of in class room instruction in the California State University system versus the California Community College system.  Obviously it's a unfair to judge every single school, department, and professor within the CSU system but as a whole the system is a joke. 
 
Wow I don't think it'll pass through, but that proposal + BOGW. :nerd: no point in transferring after that.
 
It would make a bachelor's degree meaningless since most community colleges cannot provide the type of education needed to support a bachelor's
 
I have to disagree. In the surface, policies that make a bachelors degree easier to obtain seem like they would benefit middle and working class Californians. However, the empirical evidence has shown that as this State has made a bachelors degree more and more commonplace, the more that college fails to benefit the best and brightest of the State's working class students.

As California has increased the number of students who attain a bachelors degree, the cost of that education has gone up and the value of those degrees has declined. When you keep down the number of students and combine that with meritorious admissions policies, you are able to grant degrees to students, whose parents are, those student get a well respected degree and have little or no student debt.

We tried that very model in California after World War II and it worked. Our State's grand experiment with accessible higher education for the poor but scholarly youth played a role in the rise of California's grand middle and upper middle class.

Some time in the 1980's, a variety of factors conspired and started an over expansion of the State's Higher Education System. the results have been increasingly unmarketable degrees and escalating costs to students and taxpayers.

Turning Community Colleges into public degree mills only accelerates that unfortunate trend and the end result is that everyone will have a bachelors degree and the only people getting good jobs are people with rich parents and/or Stanford, USC, UCLA and Cal degrees. That would be the very situation our State sought to avoid. We do not want an East Coast style system where only the folks with Ivy League Credentials have opportunities.

Who says people in the east coast don't have opportunities without an Ivy League degree?
 
Let's face it y'all, a degree doesn't mean **** anymore.

Whats the value of it besides getting this so called " foot in the door." Lol p diddy dint go to college, Bill gates etc. All I'm sayin is anything can be done without a degree. I think if people weren't sheep and blindly follow the system, there would be more entrpunuers and not a downhill saturated degree market.
 
Back
Top Bottom