SO say Anthony Davis and Kyrie Irving were freshmen this year....

MambaMentality824

MambaMentality824

4,120
709
Joined
Dec 25, 2005
What would be your predicted draft order. Me and my boy were discussing this last night. I'd go

1. Anthony Davis
2. Andrew Wiggins
3. Jabari Parker
4. Kyrie Irving
5. Julius Randle

This is without the benefit of hindsight that we have now- because obviously Davis and Irving are stars.
 
ant , Parker , kryrie , wiggins , Randle .

I think wiggins has OD hype btw .
 
Hard to say given we know how Davis and Irving have produced in the NBA already, but I'll go: Wiggins, Davis, Irving, Parker and Randle.
 
I remember experts were saying Kyrie wasn't deserving of the top pick and he was picked first due to a weak class. That being said

Davis, Wiggins, Parker, Irving, randle
 
PMatic said:
Hard to say given we know how Davis and Irving have produced in the NBA already, but I'll go: Wiggins, Davis, Irving, Parker and Randle.
Click to expand...
You're that high on Wiggins Pmatic? Wow



My order would be:

Davis

...


Parker
Wiggins
Irving
Randle

I'd take Davis over any prospect from the last 10 years, including Durant.
 
DT43 said:
PMatic said:
Hard to say given we know how Davis and Irving have produced in the NBA already, but I'll go: Wiggins, Davis, Irving, Parker and Randle.
Click to expand...
You're that high on Wiggins Pmatic? Wow



My order would be:

Davis

...


Parker
Wiggins
Irving
Randle

I'd take Davis over any prospect from the last 10 years, including Durant.
Click to expand...
We're basing this off their prep career, what we've seen of these prospects 6-7 games into their respective college careers and long-term projections right?
 
Davis, Kyrie are still 1-2.

Parker 3, Kansas fr center 4, Randle 5.
 
PMatic said:
DT43 said:
PMatic said:
Hard to say given we know how Davis and Irving have produced in the NBA already, but I'll go: Wiggins, Davis, Irving, Parker and Randle.
Click to expand...
You're that high on Wiggins Pmatic? Wow



My order would be:

Davis

...


Parker
Wiggins
Irving
Randle

I'd take Davis over any prospect from the last 10 years, including Durant.
Click to expand...
We're basing this off their prep career, what we've seen of these prospects 6-7 games into their respective college careers and long-term projections right?
Click to expand...
Well of course. Is Wiggins really a better prospect than Davis (on both ends)? I'm not sure if I would say that.

I can't remember what I thought of Davis after his first few college games, but probably more than I think of Wiggins right now.
 
Last edited:
DT43 said:
PMatic said:
DT43 said:
PMatic said:
Hard to say given we know how Davis and Irving have produced in the NBA already, but I'll go: Wiggins, Davis, Irving, Parker and Randle.
Click to expand...
You're that high on Wiggins Pmatic? Wow



My order would be:

Davis

...


Parker
Wiggins
Irving
Randle

I'd take Davis over any prospect from the last 10 years, including Durant.
Click to expand...
We're basing this off their prep career, what we've seen of these prospects 6-7 games into their respective college careers and long-term projections right?
Click to expand...
Well of course. Is Wiggins really a better prospect than Davis (on both ends)? I'm not sure if I would say that.

I can't remember what I thought of Davis after his first few college games, but probably more than I think of Wiggins right now.
Click to expand...
I have a firmer grasp of what Wiggins is as a prospect then I was of Davis, so there's that.

But ask me in April how I feel, because after UK's run to the championship in 2012, I penciled in Davis as a future 12 time All-Star and top five player in the league.
 
Agreed, it's not really fair to make any declarations until at least after we've seen the college season play out.

Davis dominated NCAA wire-to-wire, Wiggins would have do a lot to match that
 
Last edited:
What number would anthony bennett go
Click to expand...
Was thinking about this the other day: Where would he go in the 2014 draft?

Hell, where would he have went in 2013 if the Cavs didn't draft first? Obviously not much later, but he could have realistically lasted until at least five. I said I probably wouldn't take him in the top 10.
 
J3rm00 said:
I remember experts were saying Kyrie wasn't deserving of the top pick and he was picked first due to a weak class. That being said

Davis, Wiggins, Parker, Irving, randle
Click to expand...

Well can you blame them for saying that considering he hardly played the previous season?
 
1. Davis- not often where you have a teen go through a growth spurt like that and can actually DEFEND :x
2. Wiggins- raw athleticism and crazy upside will be talked about until draft day. I still think his speed is still underrated...
3. Kyrie- he was born to run a team
4. Jabari- same as Kyrie
5. Randle- already showed he can put a team on his back...he's scared of nobody
 
Last edited:
NY Mavurs said:
1. Davis- not often where you have a teen go through a growth spurt like that and can actually DEFEND :x
2. Wiggins- raw athleticism and crazy upside will be talked about until draft day. I still think his speed is still underrated...
3. Kyrie- he was born to run a team
4. Jabari- same as Kyrie
5. Randle- already showed he can put a team on his back...he's scared of nobody
Click to expand...


Well that's Kyrie's biggest problem besides defense he has to find the medium between scoring and passing.
 
I think Kyrie will be fine sooner than most expect

Dan Gilbert running things don't help either :lol:
 
NY Mavurs said:
I think Kyrie will be fine sooner than most expect

Dan Gilbert running things don't help either :lol:
Click to expand...

I agree. I do think he will be more effective as a SG and have an Eric Snow type PG who is known for defense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom