The Combat Jack Show Thread

That brilliant idiots interview was so hard to listen to. I can't respect Andrew as a human being after that interview smdh.
 
^ :lol:

Brilliant idiots and killer mike was good.

I listen to all their episodes. Ima fan

Also a fan of this podcast
 
Last edited:
That brilliant idiots interview was so hard to listen to. I can't respect Andrew as a human being after that interview smdh.
listen to their latest podcast

its not like the last two but they do touch on the subject.

he seems to have a better understanding now
 
listen to their latest podcast

its not like the last two but they do touch on the subject.

he seems to have a better understanding now

you know his twitter prolly got hit with pure hatred and cats off mic prolly sat that man down

charlamagne been on a ignorance streak from the white privilege comments to leaking the mayweather drops

boys going way left

he's at that point where he can really break thru and make millions and he seems super thirsty for it
 
you know his twitter prolly got hit with pure hatred and cats off mic prolly sat that man down

charlamagne been on a ignorance streak from the white privilege comments to leaking the mayweather drops

boys going way left

he's at that point where he can really break thru and make millions and he seems super thirsty for it
That's what I'm thinking, dude is trying to break through to the mainstream and is willing to tapdance hard for it.
 
That's what I'm thinking, dude is trying to break through to the mainstream and is willing to tapdance hard for it.

I say this because c's approach was always crass but hilarious because his statements would hold truth in them but lately he's getting further and further from the truth
 
Did you read my post? She didn't do anything.

He googled one of the most generic names on the planet made an assumption based off that and ran with it. Even caught personal feelings :lol:

I thought the first pic was just a filter. They have the same ombré hair.

The rest of what I said still stands.

WTF are you talking about? :smh:

Take your lipstick alley shades off and look at the ENTIRE the post. I posted the link he was referring to and who Andrew's girlfriend really is IG/Twitter link etc. ITS NOT THE SAME PERSON. He made a really stupid assumption.


Dude investigating like a lil nerd.

Fact remains I still have a rift with the person who carries the same name. It's from when she/he was solely on covers forum and before the whole espn thing. Called it on covers he/she was about to get exposed once they got hired over there.

I never even 'googled' his gf....he mentioned her whole name in one of their pods and I assumed it was the same character which had the same exact name

And if you did a good enough investigation old head you would've known that they never knew if the person actually existed or if it was a stolen identity
 
Last edited:
Dude investigating like a lil nerd.

Fact remains I still have a rift with the person who carries the same name. It's from when she/he was solely on covers forum and before the whole espn thing. Called it on covers he/she was about to get exposed once they got hired over there.

I never even 'googled' his gf....he mentioned her whole name in one of their pods and I assumed it was the same character which had the same exact name

And if you did a good enough investigation nerd you would've known that they never knew if the person actually existed or if it was a stolen identity



Investigating :lol: ...you brought the @#$% up Inspector Gadget. I wanted to see what the hell you were talking about.




Also found it funny Shultz girlfriend is the chick who got caught up scheming covers and espn ...when he mentioned her name I had to google to make sure I wasn't tripping

You did your googles BUT you just weren't smart enough to realize it was a very common name. :lol:


I just find it hilarious that you heard a such a generic name googled and ran with it making up stuff like gossipy lil !@#$%. A rift with someone you don't know...Based off a article you saw online. You really in your feelings :rofl:
 
Last edited:
Googled the name to make sure I wasn't tripping...her name + covers

Never looked up her twitter and all that...for what? Like I said old man keep investigating ...[emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji] spending time trying to piece together a rift I never went in detail about

Oh the "rift with someone you don't know" you just want me to go into it but I'm not...like I said it was on covers and the person(s) behind that are a scam

But maybe you can find out why old man....threads might still be around but I doubt it cause they always delete stuff after a certain amount of time

****** like 40 and this is how he spends his time. What's losing like?
 
Last edited:
I googled the name just like you did and deadspin since you mentioned it...only difference is I have common sense

Nerd...now I'm forty? I know you're feelings hurt. I'm pretty sure you're older than me btw. Keep reaching dummy. :lol:

Don't you have a kid? Go take care of it. Hopefully it will take after it's mother.
 
Last edited:
If you actually read the article you would know what I'm talking about. There was never a clear cut pic of who she was. It was also accusations that Sarah j Phillips was a stolen identity but it was never proven.

I googled the name + covers.com just to make sure it was the right name cause my issue came from then. Before espn and before the deadspin article.

You jumped the gun cause I said I had a rift trying to figure it out cause you're a bored old man. All this twitter **** is your own investigation :lol: ...like you're going way left when I made my stance clear that it was before all the espn/deadspin.

But I'm done with it. Bringing up my child just shows how much of a chump you are :lol: grow up...if you wanna hurt my feelings you gotta come better than that. My daughter is living well and love her pops :smile:
 
Last edited:
But back on topic. Was listening to the dame interview again and was rolling when he cracked on Dj benhameen (sp?)
 
did i miss something at the end with Gates and Pete? i wasn't really understanding what they disagreement was about COs or snitching or something like that
 
did i miss something at the end with Gates and Pete? i wasn't really understanding what they disagreement was about COs or snitching or something like that

Pete tried to get him to speak specifically on Ross being a snitch or not after he spoke in general about snitching. Pete was trying rationalize it with dirty COs. Gates refused to take the bait. Snitching is snitching. Pete wouldn't let it go.

Penitentiary Rules b.





Gates It's like when someone takes their first psychology class or a psychology major trying to analyze everyone/everything but 1000 times worse :lol:

Cool dude overall though. Probably my favorite interview of his.
 
Last edited:
i kinda got where he was coming from and at other times i would just roll my eyes...

i never heard of him before so i don't know how his other interviews go but i'm sure if they are like that it could make a lot of the people interviewing him uncomfortable
 
gates is just wanna those people who doesnt really have conversations with people

meaning no matter what you say he already has a set answer he's going to deliver even tho it doesn't match the topic or question

gates has good interviews but it's annoying at times
 
i never heard of him before so i don't know how his other interviews go but i'm sure if they are like that it could make a lot of the people interviewing him uncomfortable


Every Gates interview I've seen has went smooth. And it wasn't even that big of a deal just two stubborn people. Pete was the issue in that scenario just wouldn't let it go after trying to lead Gates into saying something about Ross. Can't fault Gates for standing his ground.
 
gates is just wanna those people who doesnt really have conversations with people

meaning no matter what you say he already has a set answer he's going to deliver even tho it doesn't match the topic or question

gates has good interviews but it's annoying at times

pretty much
 
Every Gates interview I've seen has went smooth. And it wasn't even that big of a deal just two stubborn people. Pete was the issue in that scenario just wouldn't let it go after trying to lead Gates into saying something about Ross. Can't fault Gates for standing his ground.

Gates seemed sort of grumpy from the beginning. That's why I said when I first heard it, I said he might be bi-polar. Even the subjects he was on, talking about past loves and losing people. The whole tone of the interview was different from other ones.

He sort of made comments directed at Pete's questions throughout.

And Pete wasn't going to let the swipe go after he asked the CO question. Pete had a legit question. Pete isn't one to back down when confronted. We just hadn't seen that Pete in two years.

Pete normally connects to ex-cons on the show.
 
Last edited:
Gates answered the question repeatedly...just not the way Pete wanted him too. It was just semantics he knew what Gates meant. Pete wanted him the spell it out using Ross an example and Gates wouldn't.

Nothing wrong with the question but to not let it go even after Combat interjected was OD.
 
I kind of agree with Charlemagne saying you shouldn't tell your kids about "white priviledges", don't raise them already thinking they are lesser than.

nobody should just tell their kids they're less than

you should tell them their history and how great and prestigious their bloodline is and how people have worked hard to taint that heritage

michael brown is the perfect example of how ignoring real life won't stop real life from happening to your children or anyone for that matter

you'd be a fool to not equip your kids with the knowledge that will better help them understand and navigate the world

Truth. You're not telling your kids they're lesser, you're telling 'em to be aware of how other races might look at you. I couldn't have my kids walking around blind to reality.
 
Last edited:
Every Gates interview I've seen has went smooth. And it wasn't even that big of a deal just two stubborn people. Pete was the issue in that scenario just wouldn't let it go after trying to lead Gates into saying something about Ross. Can't fault Gates for standing his ground.

this is true, gates wouldn't go there but if you listen to the interview gates was brushing pete off the whole interview
 
Gates answered the question repeatedly...just not the way Pete wanted him too. It was just semantics he knew what Gates meant. Pete wanted him the spell it out using Ross an example and Gates wouldn't.

Nothing wrong with the question but to not let it go even after Combat interjected was OD.

He was condescending in his answer though. In his answer he took a swipe at Pete. That's why Pete acted the way he did. Pete isn't the type to let it go.

His attitude towards Pete was weird the whole show. I started to go back and listen to see where it went wrong.
 
I think the whole jail bond pete was tryna have with gates made it go left but honestly I can't tell
 
Y'all looking into it to deep. Two grown ex felons having opinionated differences. thats all Pete thinks Ross had to put food on the table for his babymomma & child + they are not rats. Kev' thinks all CO's treat inmates like wild animals & they are rats. Straight up. Pete said verbatim. "I'll agree to disagree."
 
Back
Top Bottom