Nigeria bans gay marriage, gay meetings -- Does so secretly

And what scientific evidence supports that homosexuality is "vile, and a detriment to society"? I asked your opinion and you try to respond with "science, yo"


Stop going in circles.
Society has seen homosexual behavior as vile, and deviant.  You are the ones trying to convince society that it isn't, to change the rules of society.  That means it is up to you to prove that they aren't vile....because they are already considered vile.

Around we go again?

Explain how that makes any sense in relation to science? Society is a matter of opinion, not fact.

Like I said before and I'd like your opinion:

Society at one point also wanted to state that based on the color of your skin you were less of a human being than someone who was white. That's still a struggle TODAY because society at one point considered it acceptable. Do other races need to continually prove that they're equal to whites for you to believe it. Is every day a need for those races to satisfy a burden of proof for you?

Let's not even mention the science of Phrenology and how that affected non-white races.
 
Last edited:
 
A left-handed person is a person who writes with their left hand.  Otherwise they would just be a person. If being left-handed wasn't abnormal there'd be no designation for the group.

Homosexuality is vile and repulsive because gay people have sex with same sex partners.

Left handedness is vile and repulsive because left handed people write with their left hands.

If a right-handed person writes with their left-hand they therefore must be left-handed.

This is disgusting.
Wrong.  So I am left handed because I type with both my left and right hand?

The underlined would be impossible since you already referred to them as right handed.  In addition, they only right with their left hand when their right hand is injured or tired.

Heterosexuals never participate in homosexual activities. You aren't close to raising a comparable argument. 
 
Around we go again?

Explain how that makes any sense in relation to science? Society is a matter of opinion, not fact.

Like I said before and I'd like your opinion:

Society at one point also wanted to state that based on the color of your skin you were less of a human being than someone who was white. That's still a struggle TODAY because society at one point considered it acceptable. Do other races need to continually prove that they're equal to whites for you to believe it. Is every day a need for those races to satisfy a burden of proof for you?

Let's not mention the science of Phrenology and how that effected non-white races.
Like I said, Society has seen homosexual behavior as vile, and deviant.  You are the ones trying to convince society that it isn't, to change the rules of society.  That means it is up to you to prove that they aren't vile....because they are already considered vile.?

The burden of proof is on you to scientifically prove they aren't vile.  Go ahead.  Prove they are the same as everyone else. 
 
Nah bro if a right handed person chose to write with their left hand one time, they are bi handed
laugh.gif
laugh.gif
Wrong, they aren't choosing to.  It is because their right hand broke. 
 
Heterosexuals never participate in homosexual activities. You aren't close to raising a comparable argument. 

You must be sheltered. :lol: You sure about that? I know a few STRAIGHT females, some of whom are married and have kids, that were down back in the day for threesomes with another female. Isn't that considered homosexual behavior? Tell me again how heterosexuals don't participate in homosexual activities?
 
You must be sheltered.
laugh.gif
You sure about that? I know a few STRAIGHT females, some of whom are married and have kids, that were down back in the day for threesomes with another female. Isn't that considered homosexual behavior? Tell me again how heterosexuals don't participate in homosexual activities?
They aren't heterosexual...they are bisexual...
 
Last edited:
Sexuality being a spectrum was your argument. You need scientific evidence to prove that true.  You are the prosecution, I am the defense.  Prove your point.

My question is a part of my answer.  Answer my question so I can give you an answer. 

A - H - C - U - R - Q - P - L       Which is the abnormal one?


A - A - A - A - A - A - A - B       Which is the abnormal one?  How do you know that it is abnormal?  If B is abnormal, what does that make A? 
The Klein Sexual Orientation Grid addresses what I'm talking about.

I had more questions than that. Nice try.
 
 
The Klein Sexual Orientation Grid addresses what I'm talking about.

I had more questions than that. Nice try.
Link it.  Answer my question. 

A - H - C - U - R - Q - P - L       Which is the abnormal one?


A - A - A - A - A - A - A - B       Which is the abnormal one?  How do you know that it is abnormal?  If B is abnormal, what does that make A? 
 
Heterosexuals never participate in homosexual activities. You aren't close to raising a comparable argument. 

You must be sheltered. :lol: You sure about that? I know a few STRAIGHT females, some of whom are married and have kids, that were down back in the day for threesomes with another female. Isn't that considered homosexual behavior? Tell me again how heterosexuals don't participate in homosexual activities?
He doesn't know the difference between sex and sexual orientation
 
Around we go again?


Explain how that makes any sense in relation to science? Society is a matter of opinion, not fact.


Like I said before and I'd like your opinion:


Society at one point also wanted to state that based on the color of your skin you were less of a human being than someone who was white. That's still a struggle TODAY because society at one point considered it acceptable. Do other races need to continually prove that they're equal to whites for you to believe it. Is every day a need for those races to satisfy a burden of proof for you?


Let's not mention the science of Phrenology and how that effected non-white races.
Like I said, Society has seen homosexual behavior as vile, and deviant.  You are the ones trying to convince society that it isn't, to change the rules of society.  That means it is up to you to prove that they aren't vile....because they are already considered vile.?


The burden of proof is on you to scientifically prove they aren't vile.  Go ahead.  Prove they are the same as everyone else. 

Around in circles again. You won't state your opinion about the matter which is what I asked.

There is no burden of proof in societal change because it's not based on fact it's based on OPINION. And no two brains are exactly alike. It's laughable to ask for proof that they're "the same as everyone else".
 
Like I said, Society has seen homosexual behavior as vile, and deviant.  You are the ones trying to convince society that it isn't, to change the rules of society.  That means it is up to you to prove that they aren't vile....because they are already considered vile.?

The burden of proof is on you to scientifically prove they aren't vile.  Go ahead.  Prove they are the same as everyone else. 
What percentage of the population views homosexual behavior as vile? I'd like an up to date statistic. 
 
Around in circles again. You won't state your opinion about the matter which is what I asked.

There is no burden of proof in societal change because it's not based on fact it's based on OPINION. And no two brains are exactly alike. It's laughable to ask for proof that they're "the same as everyone else".
the burden of proof is on you. Not me.  Society has seen things my ways. You are trying to change things.  Prove why we are wrong. 

If you see things as being based on opinion....then you are asking me for things which don't exist which is highly manipulative.  In addition....if you believe it is based on opinion then this is a pointless conversation.

Is it laughable because I have provided scientific studies which prove they aren't the same as everyone else?
 
Last edited:
 
 
A left-handed person is a person who writes with their left hand.  Otherwise they would just be a person. If being left-handed wasn't abnormal there'd be no designation for the group.

Homosexuality is vile and repulsive because gay people have sex with same sex partners.

Left handedness is vile and repulsive because left handed people write with their left hands.

If a right-handed person writes with their left-hand they therefore must be left-handed.

This is disgusting.
Wrong.  So I am left handed because I type with both my left and right hand?

The underlined would be impossible since you already referred to them as right handed.  In addition, they only right with their left hand when their right hand is injured or tired.

Heterosexuals never participate in homosexual activities. You aren't close to raising a comparable argument. 
You keep saing "type" when I said write.  Funny that you keep trying to spin things.  All part of your agenda.

A left-handed person is a person who writes with their left hand.  Otherwise they would just be a person. If being left-handed wasn't abnormal there'd be no designation for the group.

Homosexuality is vile and repulsive because gay people have sex with same sex partners.

Left handedness is vile and repulsive because left handed people write with their left hands.

If a right-handed person writes with their left-hand they therefore must be left-handed.
 
Link it.  Answer my question. 

A - H - C - U - R - Q - P - L       Which is the abnormal one?


A - A - A - A - A - A - A - B       Which is the abnormal one?  How do you know that it is abnormal?  If B is abnormal, what does that make A? 
You never linked me to your studies. I was rather interested.

You know the rules. My questions first. 
 
They aren't heterosexual...they are bisexual...

Yah sure they bisexual even though they only participated once in a threesome. Sure buddy... but wait... it must be the right hand left hand theory... :lol: continue with your ignorant rants. It's quite amusing!
 
 
What percentage of the population views homosexual behavior as vile? I'd like an up to date statistic. 
I'm not doing your research.

Answer my question. 

A - H - C - U - R - Q - P - L       Which is the abnormal one?


A - A - A - A - A - A - A - B       Which is the abnormal one?  How do you know that it is abnormal?  If B is abnormal, what does that make A? 
 
Around in circles again. You won't state your opinion about the matter which is what I asked.


There is no burden of proof in societal change because it's not based on fact it's based on OPINION. And no two brains are exactly alike. It's laughable to ask for proof that they're "the same as everyone else".
the burden of proof is on you. Not me.  Society has seen things my ways. You are trying to change things.  Prove why we are wrong. 
Aka "these are not facts they are just some people who agree with the way I think"
 
 
Like I said, Society has seen homosexual behavior as vile, and deviant.  You are the ones trying to convince society that it isn't, to change the rules of society.  That means it is up to you to prove that they aren't vile....because they are already considered vile.?

The burden of proof is on you to scientifically prove they aren't vile.  Go ahead.  Prove they are the same as everyone else. 
What percentage of the population views homosexual behavior as vile? I'd like an up to date statistic. 
53% support gay marriage.  The majority.

His opinion is of the minority.  HE is actually the one trying to change society.  He'd never admit that though.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx
 
Last edited:
Yah sure they bisexual even though they only participated once in a threesome. Sure buddy... but wait... it must be the right hand left hand theory...
laugh.gif
continue with your ignorant rants. It's quite amusing!
They aren't ignorant.  

Definition of Ignorant: Lack of knowledge or information.

My viewpoint is based on knowledge, fact, and information.  I am the opposite of ignorant. 
 
 
 
Like I said, Society has seen homosexual behavior as vile, and deviant.  You are the ones trying to convince society that it isn't, to change the rules of society.  That means it is up to you to prove that they aren't vile....because they are already considered vile.?

The burden of proof is on you to scientifically prove they aren't vile.  Go ahead.  Prove they are the same as everyone else. 
What percentage of the population views homosexual behavior as vile? I'd like an up to date statistic. 
53%.  The majority.

His opinion is of the minority.  HE is actually the one trying to change society.  He'd never admit that though.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx
so 4% away from his opinion being seen as abnormal? 
nerd.gif
 
Last edited:
 
 
53% support gay marriage.  The majority.

His opinion is of the minority.  HE is actually the one trying to change society.  He'd never admit that though.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx
Wrong.  You are the ones trying to change society.  What is the federal law when it comes to gay marriage?
marriage isn't a federal issue.  marriage laws are governed by state.

at least know what you're talking about please. 

(disclaimer: i noticed you dropped the left-handed brain biology thing the second i posted links to back up my having a degree on the topic.  hint - you don't want to argue law with me either.)
 
Around in circles again. You won't state your opinion about the matter which is what I asked.


There is no burden of proof in societal change because it's not based on fact it's based on OPINION. And no two brains are exactly alike. It's laughable to ask for proof that they're "the same as everyone else".
the burden of proof is on you. Not me.  Society has seen things my ways. You are trying to change things.  Prove why we are wrong. 


:lol:

You're done here. The members of this NT society believe you're a bigot, a hateful scumbag, a troll, and a generally detestable individual.

You disagree? Prove it to me? :rofl:
 
Back
Top Bottom