Nigeria bans gay marriage, gay meetings -- Does so secretly

JohnnyRedStorm said:
In Ancient Rome it was normal for men to bang men and little boys in addition to women.
Click to expand...

It was more of a thing elite men did.

The majority of the population were slaves and foreigners.

A small minority.

Like among soldiers and men of property.
 
Last edited:
I'm not gonna waste your time. Long as you're happy continue being yourself. Just don't go spreading intolerance and hatred onto future generations.
 
Last edited:
UrBetterthenME said:
 
Click to expand...

".. .by conversion [toward public acceptance of homosexuality] we mean... conversion of the average American's emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media." "...our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof." – Kirk & Madsen, After the Ball, 1989, page 153.

Thanks for posting a great example of this being true. 
 
Last edited:
Rhythm808 would have fit in better on Niketalk a few years ago.

It's refreshing to see the sea change in here. A few years ago this thread would have been tilted more towards the views of this clown. Bravo, NT. Every time I contemplate leaving this place, I get reeled back in when I see how this board has evolved.
 
Wr said:
A quote I read

Sexual difference IS real as it has a function.

It's called the "Form Function Relationship.". The relation ship of a things function to its form.
Click to expand...

What does this mean for hetero being the norm

and homosexuality going against the "form function" of human anatomy?

srs discussion please...
Click to expand...

heteronormativity is not a worldwide concept.

homosexuality does go against the "form function" of our anatomy but to say the only purpose of sex is to procreate is false. Casual sex is documented in very few species but we are one of them. Seeking out pleasure is natural to us and for some people it's found in the same sex for whatever reason.
 
RIP sleazyy said:
heteronormativity is not a worldwide concept.

homosexuality does go against the "form function" of our anatomy but to say the only purpose of sex is to procreate is false. Casual sex is documented in very few species but we are one of them. Seeking out pleasure is natural to us and for some people it's found in the same sex for whatever reason.
Click to expand...

Not to mention some people are incapable of reproducing. If accepting someone based on whether or not their sexual lives are conducive to having children, I know a few heterosexual couples who shouldn't be married.
 
notoriousmro said:
What's next after accepting homosexuality into modern society? Pedophilia?



You will argue that homos can't help who they love. The same argument can be made for pedophiles.

You will argue that homos are born that way. The same argument can be made for pedophiles.

You will argue that you have homos in your family and want them to be happy. What if you had pedophiles in yours?



They're both vile, disgusting and detrimental to society. Being on the popular side of the publics opinion doesn't make you right. It just makes you sheep.
Click to expand...

This is really a tired argument. Surely you understand the difference between consensual sex between adults and rape, right?
 
notoriousmro said:
What's next after accepting homosexuality into modern society? Pedophilia?



You will argue that homos can't help who they love. The same argument can be made for pedophiles.

You will argue that homos are born that way. The same argument can be made for pedophiles.

You will argue that you have homos in your family and want them to be happy. What if you had pedophiles in yours?



They're both vile, disgusting and detrimental to society. Being on the popular side of the publics opinion doesn't make you right. It just makes you sheep.
Click to expand...

So if your side was popular would you be the sheep? Or would you form some other stupid argument in an attempt to sound like you have even the slightest inkling what you're talking about?
 
notoriousmro said:
What's next after accepting homosexuality into modern society? Pedophilia?



You will argue that homos can't help who they love. The same argument can be made for pedophiles.

You will argue that homos are born that way. The same argument can be made for pedophiles.

You will argue that you have homos in your family and want them to be happy. What if you had pedophiles in yours?



They're both vile, disgusting and detrimental to society. Being on the popular side of the publics opinion doesn't make you right. It just makes you sheep.
Click to expand...


i'm ok with being labeled "vile and disgusting". but "detrimental to society"??
 
notoriousmro said:
What's next after accepting homosexuality into modern society? Pedophilia?



You will argue that homos can't help who they love. The same argument can be made for pedophiles.

You will argue that homos are born that way. The same argument can be made for pedophiles.

You will argue that you have homos in your family and want them to be happy. What if you had pedophiles in yours?



They're both vile, disgusting and detrimental to society. Being on the popular side of the publics opinion doesn't make you right. It just makes you sheep.
Click to expand...


Rhythm808 said:
Both pedophiles and homosexuals actions are the result of abnormal levels of white brain matter. 
Click to expand...

So, do you guys think homosexuality should be criminalized like pedophilia is?

The slippery slope argument is always used by those who have trouble making their point in regards to the issue at hand.
 
lobotomybeats said:
So, do you guys think homosexuality should be criminalized like pedophilia is?

The slippery slope argument is always used by those who have trouble making their point in regards to the issue at hand.
Click to expand...
My point is completely relevant to the issue at hand, you just don't like it.  I think that PDA should be criminal.  Behind closed doors doesn't matter to me. 
 
notoriousmro said:
What's next after accepting homosexuality into modern society? Pedophilia?



You will argue that homos can't help who they love. The same argument can be made for pedophiles.

You will argue that homos are born that way. The same argument can be made for pedophiles.

You will argue that you have homos in your family and want them to be happy. What if you had pedophiles in yours?



They're both vile, disgusting and detrimental to society. Being on the popular side of the publics opinion doesn't make you right. It just makes you sheep.
Click to expand...
There's a difference between consenting adults having sex and an adult imposing their sexual will on a child incapable of granting consent.

Stop with this tired dumb argument.
 
Nako XL said:
 
There's a difference between consenting adults having sex and an adult imposing their sexual will on a child incapable of granting consent.

Stop with this tired dumb argument.
Click to expand...
".. .by conversion [toward public acceptance of homosexuality] we mean... conversion of the average American's emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media." "...our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof." – Kirk & Madsen, After the Ball, 1989, page 153.
 
Rhythm808 said:
 
Click to expand...
homosexuals trying to gain public acceptance through a planned psychological attack

roll.gif
this guy quoting the same baseless quote every time expecting people to take it seriously 
 
Rhythm808 said:
 
lobotomybeats said:
So, do you guys think homosexuality should be criminalized like pedophilia is?

The slippery slope argument is always used by those who have trouble making their point in regards to the issue at hand.
Click to expand...
My point is completely relevant to the issue at hand, you just don't like it.  I think that PDA should be criminal.  Behind closed doors doesn't matter to me. 
Click to expand...
so grown men/women raping a child behind closed doors is okay too then right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom