WELCOME TO THE MARVEL MULTIVERSE -*RIP STAN LEE & Boseman* - XMEN97 release 3/20

tay1 said:
sunshineblotters said:
Nah it makes sense to have Captain Marvel come in between IW movies given her cosmic background. Putting BP in between those two movies makes no sense. I doubt the Inhumans script is close to finished so changing it wouldnt be a problem but still. It was better off in between the two. Truth be told they shouldve just tossed Spidey in some March or August date or something and kept everything the same but I doubt they wanted 4 movies in one year
Click to expand...


How doesn't it make sense when we don't even really know everything that's going on?
Click to expand...
it breaks momentum imo

with two cosmic films in between IW 1 & 2 it gives you the sense of how the story is gonna play out. Now with BP in there it gets weird but you're right, we don't have an idea what's planned
 
Cfranchise26 said:
  Ashton Kutcher for Spidey !!!!!  Yup I said it
Click to expand...
jazz-thrown-o.gif
 
tay1 said:
Master Zik said:
Wow yall dudes went a bit out there a few pgs back. Talking about Fergie's husband and Ryan Reynolds? :lol: :x


OKB right about Hollywood and pushing the same white dudes due to racism and sexism even though they suck and aren't stars.


If Marvel wanted to, introducing Miles wouldn't be a big problem. Even if it is in Civil War. They're not doing the comic version of CW pg for pg. It'd probably be easier to fit in Miles in some ways. So makes no sense to bring up how much CW sold as a comic. It's not some untouchable flawless story.
Click to expand...
Of course it wouldn't be a big problem. He's a great character. It's just not his time.
Click to expand...
According to who?

That reply isn't really giving a good reason for why he can't be involved with Peter or instead of Peter.

If you don't want him that's one thing but I'm not seeing a reason why Miles couldn't be introduced in the upcoming movies.
 
Last edited:
it's kind of sad knowing that BP is delayed when you look back and read about how Chad has been preparing for the role..
 
Master Zik said:
According to who?

That reply isn't really giving a good reason for why he can't be involved with Peter or instead of Peter.

If you don't want him that's one thing but I'm nto seeing a reason why Miles couldn't be introduced in the upcoming movies.
Click to expand...
According to me of course.

Why should he be introduced now? Peter hasn't been used to his maximum potential yet, so I don't see why he needs to be skipped over for him. Can they replace Miles with Peter and make it work? Sure, but why rush.
 
Last edited:
tay1 said:
Osh Kosh Bosh said:
so when will be his time after the 8th peter PArker movie, 9th? 10?
Click to expand...
They could make another decade of spiderman films and it still won't be his time.
Click to expand...
This just sounds like bull ****.

You just sound anti-Miles now. Don't think for a sec Marvel won't want to capitalize on a Miles movie soon.

Sony, they'd probably never think it's time but Marvel is running **** now.
 
Last edited:
One knowledgeable source sees the move as a first step to Marvel re-acquiring the rights to Spider-Man down the road, while another believes Disney is positioning itself to acquire Sony should it ever become available.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
tay1 said:
Master Zik said:
According to who?


That reply isn't really giving a good reason for why he can't be involved with Peter or instead of Peter.


If you don't want him that's one thing but I'm nto seeing a reason why Miles couldn't be introduced in the upcoming movies.
Click to expand...


According to me of course.

Why should he be introduced now?
Click to expand...
Cuz Marvel would hypothetically want to use him now. Same way they used black Nick Fury instead of the OG and put Hawkeye and Black Widow in the Avengers instead of Ant-Man and Wasp who were apart of the OG team.
Peter hasn't been used to his maximum potential yet, so I don't see why he needs to be skipped over for him.
Click to expand...
That's not Marvel's fault. If anything that's a good reason for why Marvel would want to continue to distance themselves from past trash and change who is under the mask.
Can they replace Miles with Peter and make it work? Sure, but why rush.
Click to expand...
It's only a rush to you.
tay1 said:
Master Zik said:
This just sounds like bull ****.


You just sound anti-Miles now. Don't think for a sec Marvel won't want to capitalize on a Miles movie soon.
Click to expand...


I've already said Miles is a great character.
Click to expand...
Yeah but your reasons for why he shouldn't be used in the movies don't make sense.

I'm left with that or possible bias.
 
Last edited:
http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/10/8010259/marvel-moves-release-dates-because-spider-man

Here's the full list.

Avengers: Age of Ultron: May 1st, 2015
Ant-Man: July 17th, 2015
Captain America: Civil War: May 6th, 2016
Doctor Strange: November 4th, 2016
Guardians of the Galaxy 2: May 5th, 2017
Spider-Man: July 28th, 2017
Thor: Ragnarok: November 3rd, 2017
Avengers: Infinity War, Part 1: May 4th, 2018
Black Panther: July 6th, 2018
Captain Marvel: November 2nd, 2018
Avengers: Infinity War, Part 2: May 3th, 2019
Inhumans: July 12th, 2019
Click to expand...
 
Master Zik said:
It's only a rush to you.
Click to expand...
Nah. Plenty feel the same way.

My reason makes perfect sense. I want to see Peter. It's as simple as that. Miles is great, but they're still different characters. If they want to throw him in there to foreshadow his eventual appearance. Cool. I just don't want to see him take over the Spiderman mantle yet.

If they decide to use Miles soon, I won't have a MAJOR problem, because I like him. I like what Bendis is doing with him. I just like Peter more.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom