WELCOME TO THE MARVEL MULTIVERSE -*RIP STAN LEE & Boseman* - XMEN97 release 3/20

I mean, I like Denzel, and I liked a lot of his movies...

But even if he was still 25 years old, I dunno...

Maybe it's cuz I'm used to seeing him in all these old school movies, but I feel he'd be out of place in a comic book movie :lol:
 
Last edited:
Yes. A villain. Washington could definitely be a good Marvel villain. Who? I dunno. But definitely I see him as more of a villain instead of a hero.

A young Pacino would be the best Lex Luthor ever. :lol: I swear to god, he'd have people rooting for him to beat Superman.

A young Bruce Willis could've been a good Punisher.

Young Sean Connery could've been Iron Man, if he could do an American accent.

Arnold? Maybe Collosus.

Stallone? Drawing a blank.
 
Last edited:
I don't want Denzel involved in any Marvel films. Hell, DC films either.
 
Last edited:
I don't want Denzel involved in any Marvel films. Hell, DC films either.

Lol I think you have nothing to worry about. Looking at Denzel's filmography, he's never done anything with Sci fi or fantasy elements in his very long career. Which is kinda impressive considering actors from his generation seem to have all done it ej. Stallone, Arnold, Willis, etc

*edit

Never mind, there was Deja Vu in 2006 and Fallen in 98
 
Last edited:
I still think Denzel would've been a bomb Lex Luthor. But you know. Its only cool to change minorities into whites. Not the other way round. Can't piss off the racist population.
 
Last edited:
I still think Denzel would've been a bomb Lex Luthor. But you know. Its only cool to change minorities into whites. Not the other way round. Can't piss off the racist population.
What are you talking about?

DC turned Perry White black.

FOX turned Johnny Storm black.

SONY turned Electro black.

Marvel comics created an entire alt universe where Nick Fury looks exactly like Samuel L. Jackson and then made that version a staple of their movie series.

For so much evidence saying otherwise specifically about this it's crazy for you to say this. We still have a long way to go race relations wise, especially in Hollywood but c'mon son. Go play that race card elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
Oh, let's not turn my favorite thread in a race thread :lol:

This is your favorite thread? THIS? :x

Anyway, I'm just making an observation you can counter with Asguard's doorman and all these other weak *** characters but it's the truth.
 
Last edited:
Hahahaha. Yea, well. I'm not really a regular in too many threads, so there's not much competition.

I'm only really in the marvel threads, nba related threads, and the get in better shape thread. The other threads move quicker, but they just keep talking about **** I don't care about

Right now those other threads are going in circles and spinning the wheels

When the nba season starts up again, I will be enjoying it more
 
Last edited:
I don't want Denzel involved in any Marvel films. Hell, DC films either.

Lol I think you have nothing to worry about. Looking at Denzel's filmography, he's never done anything with Sci fi or fantasy elements in his very long career. Which is kinda impressive considering actors from his generation seem to have all done it ej. Stallone, Arnold, Willis, etc

*edit

Never mind, there was Deja Vu in 2006 and Fallen in 98

Virtuosity with Russel Crowe
 
I'd watch a Hawkeye film.
I thought he was good in the Bourne Legacy film he did.

All this chatter about who to cast as Black Panther shows how Hollywood limits the minorities. We always hear the same 5 or 6 names to play black roles.

Its disgusting and shameful on Hollywoods part.
 
I still think Denzel would've been a bomb Lex Luthor. But you know. Its only cool to change minorities into whites. Not the other way round. Can't piss off the racist population.
What are you talking about?

DC turned Perry White black.

FOX turned Johnny Storm black.

SONY turned Electro black.

Marvel comics created an entire alt universe where Nick Fury looks exactly like Samuel L. Jackson and then made that version a staple of their movie series.

For so much evidence saying otherwise specifically about this it's crazy for you to say this. We still have a long way to go race relations wise, especially in Hollywood but c'mon son. Go play that race card elsewhere.

Not to mention a black spiderman
 
Not to mention a black spiderman

They didnt turn spidey black. Foh. That's a completely different character in a universe that has two or three comics and racists are still *****ing about him. Like saying spider-girl from the MC2 universe is spidey.
 
Last edited:
So the official date for the trailer is November 7.

And apparently Avengers 3 might be split into two movies

Avengers: Age of Ultron - First Trailer Release Date and Two-Part Avengers 3 Planned
'Battle against Thanos will require more than one movie,' says source
ARJUN-VARMA By Arjun Varma
September 28, 2014 10:20 BST

Avengers: Age of Ultron
In Avengers: Age of Ultron the Avengers - 'Earth's Mightiest Heroes' - will battle a villainous intelligent robot.(Marvel Studios)
Advertisement

Looks like Avengers: Age of Ultron fans won't have to wait much longer for the film's first trailer.

According to ComicBookMovie, Warners Bros Russia announced that the first trailer for Avengers 2 will be attached to Christopher Nolan's Interstellar, which will hit theaters on 7 November 2014.

"Warner Bros. Russia announced today (via @antovolk) that the teaser will be attached to Christopher Nolan's Interstellar, which will hit theaters on 7 November," states the report.

However, as most trailers appear online about a week before they play in cinemas, it is possible that fans might get to see the Age of Ultron trailer around 31 October.

Even though Ultron is an extremely powerful and challenging nemesis, fans are wondering why Marvel's supervillain Thanos, who appeared in the end credit scene in The Avengers, as well as appearing in Guardians of the Galaxy, is not in the sequel.

Director Joss Whedon does not focus on the lack of Thanos in Avengers 2, as he prefers to keep this movie's focus on Ultron.

"We have to stay grounded. It's part of what makes the Marvel universe click – their relationship to the real world", he told Screenrant. "It's science-fiction, and Thanos is not out of the mix, but Thanos was never meant to be the next villain. He's always been the overlord of villainy and darkness."

Thanos
The first official image of intergalactic bad-guy Thanos.(Marvel Studios)
Advertisement

The Daily Marvelite "pretty confidently" claims to have inside information that Avengers 3 will be two-part movie featuring Thanos as the prime villain.

"According to a source closed to Marvel Studios, the battle against Thanos will require more than one movie to be given its proper weight. In fact, the massive battle between Earth's Mightiest Heroes and the Mad Titan is so complicated and big that it will require a two-part movie to give it its due," states the website.

The website also states that Marvel Studios have finalised two dates – one in May 2018 and May 3, 2019 – which they believe are the release dates for both parts.

"What our source has not clarified is if Avengers 3 in itself will be a two-part movie, or if it is the story that will be split into two, with the first part being Avengers 3 with a conclusion leading to a massive event movie, where Earth's Mightiest Heroes will join the Guardians of the Galaxy to take down Thanos."

The latter idea has previously been discussed by Marvel and hinted at by Guardians of the Galaxy cast member, Vin Diesel: "A great meeting," said Diesel about a meeting he had with Marvel Studios. "It was even talking about something so big I can't even talk about because it's like the merging of brands in a way, which I won't get into. That was something way, way, way, way, way down the road."
 
Back
Top Bottom