WELCOME TO THE MARVEL MULTIVERSE -*RIP STAN LEE & Boseman* - XMEN97 release 3/20

Marvel would have to reboot like they did with spiderman and do their own interpretation of the Xmen and F4. The only thing they should keep is Ryan Reynolds Deadpool
 
Movie gonna be trash
Probably gonna worse than that dumpster trash that was guardians of the Galaxy

So Doctor strange
Guardians of the Galaxy
And Thor 2
Are gonna be the only blemish on the mcu
I can live with that

SMH Thor and Cap 1, IM3 not on this list? Talking for shock value, b :smh:
Ur right
Im2 and im3 were compete trash
Cap1 was dope specially if ur old enough to have seen the 90s(I think it was the early 90's) cap movie :lol:
And thor1 was pretty good considering it introduced Thor to the mcu
 
Deadpool was alright
But wasn't anything special
I wonder why folks give it a pass
Still better than most of fox other comic book movies
 
Totally ignoring this FOX crossover bait. Just lame *** Kinberg sounding desperate and hopeful.

They know they gotta try and get a deal done before mid 2019 cux by Nov Inhumans gonna make X-Men useless to the MCU.
 
People would much rather see the xmen on screen than lame *** Medusa or Black Bolt

Lockheed > Lockjaw
 
People would much rather see the xmen on screen than lame *** Medusa or Black Bolt

Lockheed > Lockjaw
Then good luck with lame as FOX ever getting Lockheed in to a movie.

You got all the X-Men movies you can watch and another one not many are anticipating this May.

The era of the Inhuman is upon us. You either gonna get down or lay down

View media item 1993037
Since you think comic art are hints of things to come.
 
Last edited:
There'll be other premieres where they can make it.

NY, London, etc.

I'm watching some of the vid now and I didn't think everybody connected to the MCU would show up like this. Just saw Malick and Hunter/Blood from AoS get interviewed :lol:
 
Last edited:
embargo is up


Who needs a villain when you have Steve and Tony? Both protagonists. Both antagonists. And drawing other power-people to their cause in surprising ways. The clashes go far beyond the set-up squabbles of Avengers Assemble. Or even that other big 2016 superhero showdown. Forget Batman v Superman. Here you get Ant-Man v Spider-Man, Hawkeye v Black Widow, Scarlet Witch v Vision, The Winter Soldier v Black Panther and (well, duh) Captain America v Iron Man, all rolled into one. And that is what you call the ultimate Marvel superhero event. Matching its blockbuster scale and spectacle with the smarts of a great, grown-up thriller, *Captain America: Civil War* is Marvel Studios’ finest film yet. There. We said it again. [5*]

SOURCE: Empire Online


That epic runtime is the only problem. It's generally well-paced, but there's one too many plot swerves as you wait for the gang to suit up and throw down. There’s also a slightly icky and completely unnecessary romantic beat that torpedoes the MCU’s best love story, and it’s a shame that the trailers (and LEGO) gave away quite so many of the film's surprises. If there’s a risk of the Marvel ‘formula’ becoming stale, there isn’t any evidence of that here. Civil War isn’t just a damn-near-perfect popcorn crowd-pleaser; it doesn’t offer any easy answers for its combatants, or the world going forward. Team Cap or Team Iron Man? The real winner here is Team Marvel. [5*]

SOURCE: Games Radar


Arriving so quickly on the heels of “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,” there’s a temptation to treat this Marvel sequel as a rebuttal to DC's recent effort. The pitched battle between two primary heroes, set against the backdrop of a world concerned about super-powered accountability, is remarkably similar. However, the two films are couldn’t be more different in their perspectives and methods. 'Civil War' is effective thanks to a focus on character, with the film's extended roster serving to explore and underline absorbing ideas about family, friendship, and the use of power. As big as this movie is, “Captain America: Civil War” thrives on a smaller, human scale. Striking and consistently engaging, the Russos deftly craft compelling blockbuster entertainment out of a a moral and emotional conflict, and that’s more impressive than any overblown display of loud and vulgar power. [A-]

SOURCE: The Playlist


Call it “civil war” or call it brand extension; call it a “cinematic universe” or a corporate behemoth — the latest Marvel extravaganza furthers the studio’s cross-pollination of action franchises in a way that’s sure to satisfy devotees. Posing serious questions about violence and vigilantism while reveling in both, Captain America: Civil War is overlong but surprisingly light on its feet. It builds upon the plotlines of previous Avengers outings, bringing together known marquee quantities and introducing the Black Panther and a new Spidey in winning fashion.

SOURCE: The Hollywood Reporter



In the almost-too-smooth fashion that has come to define even Marvel’s non-Joss Whedon-directed entries, a steady undercurrent of droll, wisecracking humor punctures the tension at key intervals, to continually amusing if somewhat ingratiating effect; it’s a bit deflating when Iron Man at one point actually invokes “The Manchurian Candidate,” rather than simply allowing the obvious reference to speak for itself. All of which is to say that this clean-burning cinematic engine may qualify as a peak Marvel experience, but it isn’t a transcendent one; transcendence simply doesn’t factor into the calculations of a franchise dedicated more to its long-term survival strategy than to the quality of any individual chapter. “Captain America: Civil War” doesn’t break the mold; it burnishes the brand, and sets a high but not insurmountable bar. Let the games continue.

SOURCE: Variety


Featuring what's arguably the best ever screen depiction of Spider-Man as well as a cool new hero in Black Panther, Captain America: Civil War can't quite recapture the emotional and cerebral strengths of its predecessor, The Winter Soldier. Its central villain is ultimately lackluster and its final act, while dramatic, lacks the energy and effectiveness of the central action set-piece that assembles the Avengers in instant-classic fashion. [7.8]

SOURCE: IGN



Between the political issues, explosive battles and a nefarious plot by new villain-on-the-scene Helmut Zemo (Daniel Brühl), Civil War is overflowing with story. It's a gold mine for Marvel nerds that may be dizzying for the rest. Yet the central conflict between superfriends Steve and Tony stays in focus, even escalating in a real and tragic way as the plot progresses and weaves in Winter Soldier’s history of breaking bad to tear them apart even further. Rather than rooting for the fisticuffs, it hurts to watch these men, brothers in a sense, punch and blast each other into oblivion — a testament to two actors totally on their game but also to audiences’ investment in these characters paying off in dramatic fashion.

SOURCE: USA Today
 
Don't see how this doesn't do a billi now. All they have to do is call it Marvel's Civil War in China and it may do 2 billi

:smokin
 
really doubt this makes $2b if TFA barely cracked it

it'll be very impressive but I don't see it
 
Yea 2 Billi is a stretch :lol:, unless they clean up internationally .

Think a bit more than AOU around 1.5 is realistic
 
From reviews sounds like once again it's the villain that's the biggest con of the movie. This time with his plan not being all that good and relying on convenient things he couldn't have planned to happen or set up.

Also not surprised they didn't go in depth for the arguments about the movie's theme cuz if they did it'd be clear Tony is right. Civil War the comic had the same huge problems. Not just from the reasoning for why registration is good or bad but the motivations for some characters were a stretch.

Yea 2 Billi is a stretch :lol:, unless they clean up internationally .

Think a bit more than AOU around 1.5 is realistic
I'm considering big box office internationally if they do/done it right promotion wise.
 
Last edited:
Michael Keaton Circling Villain Role in 'Spider-Man: Homecoming'

The new Spider-Man movie is targeting former Batman actor Michael Keaton to play the villain in Marvel/Sony’s reboot of the web-crawling hero, The Hollywood Reporter has confirmed.

Talks are in the very stages -- it’s not quite clear if there’s an offer on the table – but overtures are there.

Titled Spider-Man: Homecoming, the movie begins shooting this summer and will launch a third incarnation of one of Marvel’s most popular heroes.

Tom Holland is starring as the hero, Peter Parker, and is making his debut as the character in Captain America: Civil War (and already garnering praise for his take on the character).

Marisa Tomei is playing Aunt May while Zendaya one of the female leads in the movie that will be directed by Jon Watts.

It is unclear what character Keaton would play in the story that is said to take Spider-Man to his high school roots.

Keaton is famous for inhabiting the cowl of Batman, starring as Bruce Wayne in Tim Burton’s two classic comic book movies, 1989’s Batman and 1992’s Batman Returns.

He was nominated for an Oscar for his work in 2014's Birdman in which he played a former superhero actor searching to redeem his post-comic book franchise career.

Keaton is repped by ICM Partners.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/michael-keaton-circling-villain-role-883753
 
Back
Top Bottom