- 1,655
- 469
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2008
Movie felt like a pay off to me.
WELCOME TO THE MARVEL MULTIVERSE -*RIP STAN LEE & Boseman* - XMEN97 release 3/20
- 10,847
- 9,067
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
Nothing, really. Thanos was a given from A1 because back in 2012 we expected him to appear as the villain in A2, but we got Ultron.
Ultron was too much of a one-off villain. It wouldn't have been so hard to have one or two of his drones survive so he could menace the heroes some other time
Last edited:
- 57,123
- 60,109
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
Ultron's not dead. And I didn't expect Thanos. It would've been stupid of Marvel to introduce him so early.
Last edited:
- 7,275
- 9,663
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2012
- 10,847
- 9,067
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
But he was already introduced
Last edited:
- 57,123
- 60,109
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
By introduce, I meant make him the villain of the next film.
But he was already introducedI'm pretty sure everyone I know expected him to be the villain of the sequel after seeing the A1 post-credits scene
Because it makes perfect sense to include, arguably, their most powerful villain, facing a handful of heroes in IM, Thor, BW, Hawkeye, Cap and Hulk. Don't know why anyone would've expected that.
Last edited:
- 1,655
- 469
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2008
I can't front, I did expect Thanos to be the next villain for the avengers. However, when I saw the setup they were laying out, I couldn't be mad.
airthompson
Staff member
- 13,723
- 9,305
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
The fact that Ultron, Loki, and Red Skull are still running around somewhere makes me scratch my head. Marvel gotta start letting these guys off these villians, word to the OG Spider-Man trilogy.
Thanos will be more than enough for the Avengers, so I dont get why they're being left alive. I know, they can appear later down the line. But the MCU is large enough for them to start offing dudes.
Im just saying.
Thanos will be more than enough for the Avengers, so I dont get why they're being left alive. I know, they can appear later down the line. But the MCU is large enough for them to start offing dudes.
Im just saying.
- 10,847
- 9,067
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
Where exactly are ya'll getting Ultron being alive from?
- 57,123
- 60,109
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
Stane, Mickey Rourke dude, ole dude from IM3, Malekith, Ronan, Zemo and more maybe? Villains are being offed.
Last edited:
- 146,420
- 192,622
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
You mean Von strucker?
- 16,421
- 2,164
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2012
If they killed everyone off in their first movie we'd be out of decent villains before the end of Phase 3
They can't kill Loki. Best villain so far and a much better reason to watch Thor than Thor himself.
Ultron is gone. He aint around.
- 57,123
- 60,109
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
Ultron is gone the same way Red Skull is. Dude aint dead.
Yeah. I get my Nazi villains confused sometimes.
- 16,421
- 2,164
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2012
Dont care for them to die. Rather they continue not dying than dying and being revived all the time.
- 16,413
- 8,760
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2012
Opinions on if Asa Butterfield is cast as Spidey?
airthompson
Staff member
- 13,723
- 9,305
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
Since y'all put it that way. Loki, I agree needs to stay alive. Dude is like the Magneto in the Disney franchise, he plays both sides and is needed for the Thor story arch.
- 10,847
- 9,067
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
Too ******* young
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
But young is what they're going for.
Sounds like they wanna Harry Potter the character.
Sounds like they wanna Harry Potter the character.
- 16,413
- 8,760
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2012
Only scenario I see if Hiddleston ends his tenure/contract as Loki is to sacrifice himself to save Thor from Thanos
Last edited:
- 57,123
- 60,109
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
I see Loki fighting on the side to stop Thanos. Not sacrificing himself. We already saw that in Thor II. It's not going to have the same effect.
- 16,413
- 8,760
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2012
True...man, The Dark World was so forgettable lol
- 23,529
- 14,852
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
Son of a *****, that young?!
- 16,413
- 8,760
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2012
Radcliffe was cast as Harry when he was 11. Butterfield is 18 right now haha.
Last edited:
- 10,847
- 9,067
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
Dude looks 12.
iDon’tRead
formerly winter91
- 4,437
- 1,906
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2014
