who would win in a fight? Vol. 100xBrock Lesnar V. 10xSilverback

 
Posted in another thread, but I think its relevant here

Brock would have to beat this guy first
them 'roos got that killer thai clinch
ibzU5d1g8NHeOb.gif
 
No one said this fight is happenin in an octagon. If it was however they could jus dogpile the ggorilla and cave its head in. Which is what would happen n the natural too. Theres a reason we are our only predators.

Brains and thumbs boys brains and thUmbs. 100 Brocks throwin baseball size rocks at the gorillas equals fractured skulls. Not to mention using the terrain and crude clubs

10:1

Of course weapons aren't a part of this. It's a physical fight not a shoot out
 
Of course weapons aren't a part of this. It's a physical fight not a shoot out

Stones and trees arnt weapons theyre from nature. You are taking away brocks only advantage once u start placing rules on it, all is fair n love and war.

Man >
 
Stones and trees arnt weapons theyre from nature. You are taking away brocks only advantage once u start placing rules on it, all is fair n love and war.

Man >

Man of course there are rules. That's like saying if they fought in the ocean the people would win or of they fought in pitch black the people have a better chance lol. That just kills the question
 
 
Of course weapons aren't a part of this. It's a physical fight not a shoot out
Stones and trees arnt weapons theyre from nature. You are taking away brocks only advantage once u start placing rules on it, all is fair n love and war.

Man >
So you're telling me in a fight this 

1374079446_3652_brock-lesnar.jpg


will win against this?





55493-004-D7B6838F.jpg
article-1377367-0BA0838500000578-681_470x571.jpg


http://seaworld.org/en/animal-info/animal-infobooks/gorilla/physical-characteristics/
Gorillas have larger muscles in their arms than in their legs (the opposite is true for humans). This is primarily due to the fact that they use their increased arm strength for bending and gathering foliage and for defense. Although capable of walking upright on two feet they most often walk as a quadruped (on four limbs).
 
Gorillas' arms are much longer than their legs and their arm span is about 30 cm (1 ft) longer than that of an adult human male. The elongated arms indicate a tree-dwelling ancestry even though gorillas are now primarily terrestrial (ground-dwelling).
 
Gorillas have large strong teeth adapted for the coarse vegetation they consume.

Adult males develop big, sharp canines as they mature.
skulls.png


pic-inset-eyes.png


The inset eyes of the gorilla help protect them from
environmental and defensive conditions.
The thumb and big toe of gorillas oppose the other digits (fingers/toes), enabling them to grasp and manipulate objects
feet.png


Not to mention that Gorillas can reach a top speed of 25mph while Usain Bolt would cap at about 23mph. Given that bit of info, I'm sure Brock wouldn't even be able to get 2-3 steps in. 

GorillaYawning01_2.gif


Also lets take into account the amount of FORCE it takes to break human bones. As little as 25lbs can break the small bones. A gorilla's bite clocks in at 1300 psi; more than a Grizzly Bear, Lion, and Tiger.

So go ahead and think those little sticks and stones will do anything
laugh.gif


The only way Brocks could win was to set up traps beforehand, but that wouldn't even completely level the playing field. Without any modern technology the Brocks would be reduced to Neanderthal/ Early Human status 
 
Last edited:
 
 
Of course weapons aren't a part of this. It's a physical fight not a shoot out
Stones and trees arnt weapons theyre from nature. You are taking away brocks only advantage once u start placing rules on it, all is fair n love and war.

Man >
So you're telling me in a fight this 

1374079446_3652_brock-lesnar.jpg


will win against this?





55493-004-D7B6838F.jpg
article-1377367-0BA0838500000578-681_470x571.jpg


http://seaworld.org/en/animal-info/animal-infobooks/gorilla/physical-characteristics/
Gorillas have larger muscles in their arms than in their legs (the opposite is true for humans). This is primarily due to the fact that they use their increased arm strength for bending and gathering foliage and for defense. Although capable of walking upright on two feet they most often walk as a quadruped (on four limbs).
 
Gorillas' arms are much longer than their legs and their arm span is about 30 cm (1 ft) longer than that of an adult human male. The elongated arms indicate a tree-dwelling ancestry even though gorillas are now primarily terrestrial (ground-dwelling).
 
Gorillas have large strong teeth adapted for the coarse vegetation they consume.

Adult males develop big, sharp canines as they mature.
skulls.png


pic-inset-eyes.png


The inset eyes of the gorilla help protect them from
environmental and defensive conditions.
The thumb and big toe of gorillas oppose the other digits (fingers/toes), enabling them to grasp and manipulate objects
feet.png


Not to mention that Gorillas can reach a top speed of 25mph while Usain Bolt would cap at about 23mph. Given that bit of info, I'm sure Brock wouldn't even be able to get 2-3 steps in. 

GorillaYawning01_2.gif


Also lets take into account the amount of FORCE it takes to break human bones. As little as 25lbs can break the small bones. A gorilla's bite clocks in at 1300 psi; more than a Grizzly Bear, Lion, and Tiger.

So go ahead and think those little sticks and stones will do anything
laugh.gif


The only way Brocks could win was to set up traps beforehand, but that wouldn't even completely level the playing field. Without any modern technology the Brocks would be reduced to Neanderthal/ Early Human status 
laugh.gif
finally someone else talking some sense in this thread. i tried earlier.
 
Last edited:
Lebatard show has a zoologist guy, Ron Migil, on weekly and people ask him these kinds of things all the time. The animals usually win and I think he'd say the gorillas in this case too. But still an interesting question... The answer about the Brock Lesnar's all jumping from a plane was hilarious tho, reps to that guy
 
10 versus 1

No 1 man stands any sorta chance. Prob not even 5 or 6. But ten....

A wolf has no shot against a grizzly bear either... but ten of them..



Man >
 
Back
Top Bottom