Pantone 11s "Gift of Flight Pack" $500 - Dec. 23, 2014

How do you feel about the "GOF" pack?

  • Cop

    Votes: 137 24.3%

  • Not

    Votes: 46 8.2%

  • XX9's Ruined It

    Votes: 228 40.4%

  • Too Expensive

    Votes: 229 40.6%
  • Total voters
    564
Show All
LAOKRATWR said:
By the way im 33 , are you 50?

And your only solid piece of inside infoever is not 100% sure?


I actually should have stopped reading at \I was collecting sneakers befre you were in diapers ' comment.

:rofl:
Click to expand...

I'm 43. And I was 11 years old when I got the first AJ. Sounds about right. Yeezy sku and AJ 1 bred is your big scoop? Let me just stop now before disappear in your shadow.

I haven't seen or heard one hint of an AJ IV release reported for spring on here or any other website. So we'll just leave it at that. Jordan rep wouldn't give away the colors but from the hints she gave and clues from the past I would say that gets about as close to 100% as it gets. Much like the Pantone release this fall. Time will tell who's right or who's wrong on both of these pieces of info. I'm willing to admit if I end up being wrong, which I won't. The question is will you?
 
redman4192 said:
 
To call any 11, garbage is just insane. I'm not a fan personally of every colorway, but I recognize greatness. That being said, keep on hating. More for me!
Click to expand...
If we're talking about mids, I agree. No bad mid color ways . Even the Gamma XI aren't bad...

lows on the other hand...
 
cheddaman said:
 
Click to expand...
Str8 
smokin.gif
!!!
 
MattVA said:
redman4192 said:
 
To call any 11, garbage is just insane. I'm not a fan personally of every colorway, but I recognize greatness. That being said, keep on hating. More for me!
Click to expand...
If we're talking about mids, I agree. No bad mid color ways . Even the Gamma XI aren't bad...

lows on the other hand...
Click to expand...

Cement Lows are garbage. :smh: Not sure what Nike was thinking with that choice. Sometimes I think they deliberately try to see how much they can get away with in terms of releases.
 
Jays25 said:
Cement Lows are garbage.
mean.gif
Not sure what Nike was thinking with that choice. Sometimes I think they deliberately try to see how much they can get away with in terms of releases.
Click to expand...
They're better than the gammas and the anniversary 11s though.
 
redman4192 said:
I'm 43. And I was 11 years old when I got the first AJ. Sounds about right. Yeezy sku and AJ 1 bred is your big scoop? Let me just stop now before disappear in your shadow.

I haven't seen or heard one hint of an AJ IV release reported for spring on here or any other website. So we'll just leave it at that. Jordan rep wouldn't give away the colors but from the hints she gave and clues from the past I would say that gets about as close to 100% as it gets. Much like the Pantone release this fall. Time will tell who's right or who's wrong on both of these pieces of info. I'm willing to admit if I end up being wrong, which I won't. The question is will you?
Click to expand...

I get my info from a European swoosh account since a very close friend of mine works for nike.

I have delivered over and over on NT , and if the yeezy red october sku seems like an easy scoop to you , Im not worthy ....(btw 3-4 sites released it soon after my post , and I was actually the first dude online , NT the first site , to confirm it , but still not worthy I understand)

ALL my info has been 100% accurate as of this day , since Im talking out of NIKE and not 'a retailer i know' .

Since your 'retailer' knows they will be releasing , please ask of him to tell you the sku number of the shoe.I can search it down by that.If he doesnt have it he is probably lying , since all most retailers can see is the sku number and a few details , especially that far from release.

The pantones are nowhere to be found in ANY nike - swoosh official account.

Yeezys were months prior the release.

I will be around when they release of course so I can admit my false info , never had a problem with that , even though it still hasnt happened.

August to November right? Waiting on that SKU fam , to check for myself if Im wrong

;p)

p.s.The 'I collect since you were in diapers' and 'I ve been in here since the old NT' are so naive and immature comments bro , no matter the outcome of our disagreement.

You dont know who is on the other side of the line , nor since when he s been here too.

Cheers.

p.s 2 Only chance Im out on the pantones , is that they dont release in Europe , so Ill give it 90% on my way.

If they do release in the US only though , I WANT A PAIR. 8)
 
Last edited:
Jays25 said:
They most certainly aren't.
Click to expand...
The gammas could've been much better. the yellow, small amount of gamma blue and the purple sole ruin that shoe. easilly the worst 11. The anniversaries dont have a jumpman. All of my firends that copped last December are feeling buyer's remorse. the gammas could've been good. the only thing people cry about on the cements are the backtab and toungetag.

 
LAOKRATWR said:
I get my info from a European swoosh account since a very close friend of mine works for nike.

I have delivered over and over on NT , and if the yeezy red october sku seems like an easy scoop to you , Im not worthy ....(btw 3-4 sites released it soon after my post , and I was actually the first dude online , NT the first site , to confirm it , but still not worthy I understand)

ALL my info has been 100% accurate as of this day , since Im talking out of NIKE and not 'a retailer i know' .

Since your 'retailer' knows they will be releasing , please ask of him to tell you the sku number of the shoe.I can search it down by that.If he doesnt have it he is probably lying , since all most retailers can see is the sku number and a few details , especially that far from release.

The pantones are nowhere to be found in ANY nike - swoosh official account.

Yeezys were months prior the release.

I will be around when they release of course so I can admit my false info , never had a problem with that , even though it still hasnt happened.

August to November right? Waiting on that SKU fam , to check for myself if Im wrong

;p)

p.s.The 'I collect since you were in diapers' and 'I ve been in here since the old NT' are so naive and immature comments bro , no matter the outcome of our disagreement.

You dont know who is on the other side of the line , nor since when he s been here too.

Cheers.

p.s Only chance Im out on the pantones , is that they dont release in Europe , so Ill give it 90% on my way.

If they do release in the US only though , I WANT A PAIR.
glasses.gif
Click to expand...
 
extintion84 said:
Jays25 said:
They most certainly aren't.
Click to expand...


The gammas could've been much better. the yellow, small amount of gamma blue and the purple sole ruin that shoe. easilly the worst 11. The anniversaries dont have a jumpman. All of my firends that copped last December are feeling buyer's remorse. the gammas could've been good. the only thing people cry about on the cements are the backtab and toungetag.

Click to expand...

The funny thing is that's literally just your opinion. I can give mine too.

Sole is dark blue on the gamma's, not purple, and it's one of the best parts of the shoe. The yellow jumpman should've been blue, but other aspects of the shoe make up for it.The Sa's not having a jumpman also doesn't ruin the entire shoe. The cement lows having hints of infrared, and that bit of cement on the back makes it the ugliest 11 by far, just a bastardized space jam. You downplay the bad elements of the cements in favor of exaggerating the bad elements of the gamma's and silver anniversaries. More people like both of those over the lows, which is why resell for them is around the same price as the Breds.
 
Last edited:
Jays25 said:
Sole is dark blue on the gamma's, not purple, and it's one of the best parts of the shoe. The yellow jumpman should've been blue, but other aspects of the shoe make up for it.The Sa's not having a jumpman also doesn't ruin the entire shoe. The cement lows having hints of infrared, and that bit of cement on the back makes it the ugliest 11 by far, just a bastardized space jam. You downplay the bad elements of the cements in favor of exaggerating the bad elements of the gamma's and silver anniversaries. More people like both of those over the lows, which is why resell for them is around the same price as the Breds.
Click to expand...
The resale price is as high as it is because of hype mids get in general. I think the hits of infared make the shoe pop. in the end, we're arguing over eachother's opinions, so it wont make a difference. personally, IMO cement lows > Concord LOWS, Aniversary, Pantones, Nightshade lows, Tuxedo lows and gammas, but that's my opinion. I just feel as though if we were gonna get an all black 11, the blackout snakeskin pair would've been better, since i'm not really a fan of gammas.
 
Last edited:
Resale prices are what they are because people desire the shoe enough to pay $300 and some change. If people didn't pay the prices wouldn't be what they are. Same applies to the Breds and the Concords. I think the cement lows are the ugliest of the bunch, even worse than the snakeskins. The only flaw the gamma's have to me is the yellow jumpman. The black on black look of them, plus the dark blue sole more than makes up for it though.
 
Jays25 said:
Resale prices are what they are because people desire the shoe enough to pay $300 and some change. If people didn't pay the prices wouldn't be what they are. Same applies to the Breds and the Concords. I think the cement lows are the ugliest of the bunch, even worse than the snakeskins. The only flaw the gamma's have to me is the yellow jumpman. The black on black look of them, plus the dark blue sole more than makes up for it though.
Click to expand...
Do you think the gammas look better than blacked out playoffs (and spacejams i guess)?
 
The Gammas are not the shoe people should be hating on. I've seen worse 11 designs. IMO snakeskin takes the cake
 
extintion84 said:
Jays25 said:
Resale prices are what they are because people desire the shoe enough to pay $300 and some change. If people didn't pay the prices wouldn't be what they are. Same applies to the Breds and the Concords. I think the cement lows are the ugliest of the bunch, even worse than the snakeskins. The only flaw the gamma's have to me is the yellow jumpman. The black on black look of them, plus the dark blue sole more than makes up for it though.
Click to expand...


Do you think the gammas look better than blacked out playoffs (and spacejams i guess)?
Click to expand...

Yes. The only thing keeping the Gammas from just being the best 11 of all time is the yellow jumpman. Blue's my favorite color, so I prefer the dark blue sole over the red of the Breds, and definitely over the clear/ice blue soles of the other 11's. The black on black look then looks better than the black/white look of the Breds and Space Jams. I actually don't like the "Dirty Bred" customs as much as I do the regular old Breds however, so the look varies from shoe to shoe, color to color. My top three 11's, with no order as I really do see them as equal, are Breds, Cool Greys, and Gammas.
 
1st. If pantones come out low i will be beyond disappointed.

2nd. Can't understand why Gammas are hated on so hard but people go crazy over Columbias when its just a "white gamma" all OG/non OG aside the Gammas would be many peoples grails if they were actually worn by Mike. But because they are retro+ they get hate like I've never seen on an 11. If anything lets get on those cement low 11s and those snakesins that just dropped.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom