Michigan Senate passes bill on drug test for welfare receivers

if they drug test for aid they should also alcohol test.

more whinos on government assistance than weedheads

sorry to bust white bred bubbles
 
LOL @ crossing his paragraph out


you arguing laws and crossing out the responses of someone who's actually law-educated.


:rofl:
 
ohmygosher said:
 
AK Nako said:
 
ohmygosher said:
 
AK Nako said:
 
ohmygosher said:
 
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


Go make a thread crying about the way Kanye is treated. This is over your head.

laugh.gif
@ the thought of you having a law degree.
Click to expand...
You sound like a fool.
Click to expand...

And you've proven to be one.
Click to expand...
stupid-people-never-argue-with-stupid-people-preview.jpg


k.
 
Last edited:
AK Nako said:
Because the federal government offered individual states incentives to make their local laws uniform and 21.  And in almost every state you can still drink under the age of 21 if you have parental consent.

And alcohol consumption is nowhere close to sexual reproduction and marriage.

The government can not mandate abortions or birth control.  Pick a different argument. Or go research every supreme court ruling on marriage, sex, and abortions and then come back and pick a different argument.
Click to expand...

gov. can do whatever hey want and have. they made a girl get birth control as part of his probation,,another judge mad a women change her baby name
 
Superb said:
 
AK Nako said:
Because the federal government offered individual states incentives to make their local laws uniform and 21.  And in almost every state you can still drink under the age of 21 if you have parental consent.

And alcohol consumption is nowhere close to sexual reproduction and marriage.

The government can not mandate abortions or birth control.  Pick a different argument. Or go research every supreme court ruling on marriage, sex, and abortions and then come back and pick a different argument.
Click to expand...
gov. can do whatever hey want and have. they made a girl get birth control as part of his probation,,another judge mad a women change her baby name
Click to expand...
Yes, in People v. Johnson.  A judge made a lady choose between 2 or 3 years probation and birth control or 7 years in prison.  It was coerced sterilization and she challenged the ruling.  She got caught using cocaine and went to jail anyway so the court never ruled on it, but it would have been found unconstitutional.

There's a reason why, as far as I know, there's never been a similar occurrence in the country.

In fact, if you look up that case you'll find legal and medical journal article after article specifically detailing why what that judge did was unconstitutional and illegal.

As far as forced contraception as a condition for welfare, there's a rule called The Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine for Individual Rights.

It says: "... in conditioning the receipt of a government benefit, the government must not be allowed to do indirectly what it may not do directly."

The government can't force you to not have kids.  Therefore it can't make forced sterilization a condition for receiving aid.

It doesn't matter if it's mandated or through coercion.  It's still unconstitutional.

http://definitions.uslegal.com/u/unconstitutional-conditions-doctrine/
 
Last edited:
Diego said:
You guys all been bamboozled again.
You all are arguing over bread crumbs that some of these families get, you over look the pie that these govt officials take.

How bout a law that tests politicians for drugs?
See how much of your tax dollars are spent on them getting high.
Click to expand...

ain't that the truth.. gov. got caught smoking crack, another politician got caught buying a 8 ball on tax payer money in Florida

everyone want to attack welfare but politicians is sealing more money

it's easygoing attack. the low lies that's why people do it. it make them feel good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom