LC JORDAN 88s

• Apr 6, 2014

• #1

escalated

32

10

Joined

Sep 13, 2012

Thanks in advance... View media item 902118
View media item 902119

 

• Apr 6, 2014

• #2

escalated

32

10

Joined

Sep 13, 2012

View media item 902120
View media item 902121

 

• Apr 6, 2014

• #3

escalated

32

10

Joined

Sep 13, 2012

View media item 902122
View media item 902127

 

• Apr 6, 2014

• #4

Bert.

93,960

32,986

Joined

Oct 24, 2010

more pics, side angles of the whole shoe

better light as well

 

• Apr 6, 2014

• #5

Rumble Gang

formerly retrohead182

7,981

4,083

Joined

Oct 6, 2013

Agreed with the more pics and better lighting. Better shot of the tongues and front. I'm not liking the EP on the front so far. Tongue looks like it's tucked away. Also what other 3s box are you showing?

 

• Apr 6, 2014

• #6

escalated

32

10

Joined

Sep 13, 2012

That is the powder 3 box.... Give me 5 minutes im gonna post some better pics from my phone...

 

• Apr 6, 2014

• #7

Bert.

93,960

32,986

Joined

Oct 24, 2010

retrohead182 said:

Agreed with the more pics and better lighting. Better shot of the tongues and front. I'm not liking the EP on the front so far. Tongue looks like it's tucked away. Also what other 3s box are you showing?

Click to expand...

plus the perforations on the tongue and ankle look just like the fakes, they arent as deep and detailed.

 

• Apr 7, 2014

• #8

escalated

32

10

Joined

Sep 13, 2012

View media item 902184
View media item 902185
View media item 902187
View media item 902188
View media item 902190
View media item 902194
View media item 902195
View media item 902196
Box font is off and the elephant print doesn't spill on to the back like the other box. I still can't tell.

 

• Apr 7, 2014

• #9

Bert.

93,960

32,986

Joined

Oct 24, 2010

fake IMO

 

• Apr 7, 2014

• #10

Rumble Gang

formerly retrohead182

7,981

4,083

Joined

Oct 6, 2013

Yea I'm gonna have to say GM EP is high on both front and back also the front print is just thick and off. Also that box is def off

 

• Apr 7, 2014

• #11

ady2glude707

6,548

2,596

Joined

Nov 4, 2002

GM, not fake.

 

• Apr 7, 2014

• #12

Rumble Gang

formerly retrohead182

7,981

4,083

Joined

Oct 6, 2013

ady2glude707 said:

GM, not fake.

Click to expand...

GM= fake. Don't even start this BS

 

• Apr 7, 2014

• #13

Bert.

93,960

32,986

Joined

Oct 24, 2010

ady2glude707 said:

GM, not fake.

Click to expand...

the shoes are fake, GM means they are fake.

SMH

 

• Apr 7, 2014

• #14

escalated

32

10

Joined

Sep 13, 2012

So general consensus is these are grey market?

 

• Apr 7, 2014

• #15

Rumble Gang

formerly retrohead182

7,981

4,083

Joined

Oct 6, 2013

Escalated said:

So general consensus is these are grey market?

Click to expand...

Yes sir. You can wait for more opinions just to reassure yourself

 

• Apr 7, 2014

• #16

escalated

32

10

Joined

Sep 13, 2012

Gonna take your twos advice... Just filed my claim wanted these to be my birthday kicks lol

 

• Apr 7, 2014

• #17

agsz

3,469

855

Joined

Dec 27, 2013

Escalated said:

Gonna take your twos advice... Just filed my claim

wanted these to be my birthday kicks lol

Click to expand...

good luck man. i've seen some 9.5's for around 300

 

• Apr 7, 2014

• #18

N

nykickstape

1,288

320

Joined

Feb 21, 2014

These don't look too good. the eprint looks too dark. Good luck trying to get your money back bro.

 

• Apr 7, 2014

• #19

from88til

5,692

1,762

Joined

Jan 6, 2014

They're 100% fake, period. The pics say it all. Completely wrong shape when next to the powder blues and infrareds. Discolored heel tab, perforations as mentioned earlier, eprint is off as well as the cuts. The box and the jumpmen on the tongue are also wrong.