Legit or not guys?!?

jcraig610

jcraig610

43
11
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
GALLERY]
 
Need better pics because the ones you took are blurry or awkward angled. They look fake though from what I see. The arch that's supposed to be on the back sole and midsole looks almost non existent, the 23s look off and collars look kinda fat. Also the toe caps look wide almost like if they OGs but they're not OGs.
 
from88til said:
Super fake. The whole shape is just off.
Click to expand...
Yo 88, I was jus checking on that post of the Concorde with the jumpman going in opposite direction n u replied that they were real, that is probably the easiest way to tell of fake or not, so sorry if I think ur credibility is off my man!
 
jcraig610 said:
Yo 88, I was jus checking on that post of the Concorde with the jumpman going in opposite direction n u replied that they were real, that is probably the easiest way to tell of fake or not, so sorry if I think ur credibility is off my man!
Click to expand...
Seems like you don't know 11s....
If you think reverse jumpmans are a way to tell real vs fake then you need to do some research. Reverse jumpmans were on all older model releases. SJs, Breds columbias etc.
these are fake. Shape is very off, 23s look off, PL cut is high
 
jcraig610 said:
Yo 88, I was jus checking on that post of the Concorde with the jumpman going in opposite direction n u replied that they were real, that is probably the easiest way to tell of fake or not, so sorry if I think ur credibility is off my man!
Click to expand...

Actually I know exactly which LC you're talking about and those Concords were the '00 releases which did have the backwards jumpman still on the left shoe. The more recent retro which are the '11 release have the right facing jumpman on both shoes which is probably what you are referring to. But I can give you the details as to why the pair posted in this thread are fake.

As I mentioned the whole shape of the shoe is off. The heel of the midsoles are way too round and should come to a point. The 23's are completely wrong and shouldn't have a space between the 2 and 3 unless they are the releases before '01. The patent leather is super dull when it should be shiny. The rope laces are way too thin. The toe caps are the wrong shape and are milky looking when they should be see through. The carbon fiber on the soles is also not carbon fiber at all.
 
from88til said:
Actually I know exactly which LC you're talking about and those Concords were the '00 releases which did have the backwards jumpman still on the left shoe. The more recent retro which are the '11 release have the right facing jumpman on both shoes which is probably what you are referring to. But I can give you the details as to why the pair posted in this thread are fake.

As I mentioned the whole shape of the shoe is off. The heel of the midsoles are way too round and should come to a point. The 23's are completely wrong and shouldn't have a space between the 2 and 3 unless they are the releases before '01. The patent leather is super dull when it should be shiny. The rope laces are way too thin. The toe caps are the wrong shape and are milky looking when they should be see through. The carbon fiber on the soles is also not carbon fiber at all.
Click to expand...

Ok, I appreciate it n I will agree with u, do u at least think they r descent replicas, can I get away with wearing them or try to sell them?
 
jcraig610 said:
Ok, I appreciate it n I will agree with u, do u at least think they r descent replicas, can I get away with wearing them or try to sell them?
Click to expand...

Btw 88, I do a set of the 23 fix, u think that will help if I put them on there or don't even waste using them ATM?
Thanks
 
jcraig610 said:
Ok, I appreciate it n I will agree with u, do u at least think they r descent replicas, can I get away with wearing them or try to sell them?
Click to expand...

Hard to say. People get away with selling the better fakes all the time which is why they get around so much and are legit checked on here everyday. To me, a good replica (even though I don't support wearing/selling replicas) are ones that are really hard to tell apart from the authentic ones. Which these are not. You wouldn't be able to wear these and get away with it being around the genuine sneaker heads that can spot fakes on feet. You would be able to get away with the better fakes that you can only tell are fake from the back of the shoes if you wear them with jeans covering the back. You would not be able to get away with selling these IMO even if you made the 23 immaculate because the whole shoe is off. I'm sure the box for these are also super off and these releases didn't come with paper stuffing inserts for the shoes, they came with the red shoe trees that all the retro 11's come with.
 
If you don't mind, could you post pics of the box and what it comes with so I could tell you the differences from the authentic boxes?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Help LC Jordan 1 not for resale
Replies
0
Views
247
cero
C
ProphesierMean
Legit check Nike off white presto black
Replies
0
Views
369
ProphesierMean
ProphesierMean
chunks
Jordan 4 Bred Legit Check
Replies
1
Views
640
7792
7792
A
Nike Air Max Plus legit or fake
Replies
0
Views
590
antibax240
A
K
Concord 11 legit check
Replies
0
Views
672
KnowTheLedge
K

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom