- 116
- 13
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2013
I'm not 100% sure if they even make GM gs sizes, correct me if i'm wrong. But below are the pictures the the seller provided me. The shoe doesn't come with extra laces. Let me know. WILL REP! thanks
Legit check: Jordan I ROYAL GS 7Y will REP
- Thread in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' Thread starter Started by porkchop,
- Start date
- 8,274
- 2,165
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2001
compared to these from a legit ebay seller they look good
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2013-Nike-A...D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
- leather isnt shiny like grey markets
- stitching is on point, and no widows peaks on the leather
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2013-Nike-A...D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
- leather isnt shiny like grey markets
- stitching is on point, and no widows peaks on the leather
- 116
- 13
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2013
^^ Nice find on a comparison auction. I do notice that the box label on these are MUCH bolder than the one you linked me too. I'm not sure if this is normal.
- 8,274
- 2,165
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2001
could be the angle or the lighting. will continue to do more homework on these. not alot of info on GS 1s
- 3,469
- 855
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
Not 100% sure, but shouldn't the wings logo be pointing upwards like the Men's release?
- 116
- 13
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2013
the comparison pair form ebay does seem like its pointing higher than this paper. i'm not sure though, could be angles.
- 640
- 211
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
I don't think it is the angle of the picture. In the last photo you posted, it kind of confirms that the Wings logo is indeed pointing on the first eyelet on the wing and not the second eyelet like it should. But I'm not sure if authentic GS pairs share all the same characteristics as authentic Men's pairs.
- 8,274
- 2,165
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2001
i noticed that GS black toes and Breds have the extra laces. So why wont Royals? Can someone confirm that GS Royals come with or without laces?
- 116
- 13
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2013
it does come with extra laces, seller just lost it or something.
- 69
- 17
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2013
- 5,692
- 1,762
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
They look ok.. But the font is a little too bold on the box tag and as agsz mentioned, I think the wings logo should be angled. Here's a pic of my fiancé's bred 1's.
View media item 1079918
View media item 1079919
View media item 1079918
View media item 1079919
- 10,288
- 3,826
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
Id say these look ok.
- 7,138
- 6,237
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2007
Im leaning towards GM.
-some of the stitching is off.
-toe box is shaped different.
-shoe tag under the tounge has the light border.
-Bar code numbers are different.
-Box sticker font. ( As someone stated earlier.)
Also, GS Royals did not come with extra laces. If the seller "lost" them... that's a flag to me.
Here's my pair.
-some of the stitching is off.
-toe box is shaped different.
-shoe tag under the tounge has the light border.
-Bar code numbers are different.
-Box sticker font. ( As someone stated earlier.)
Also, GS Royals did not come with extra laces. If the seller "lost" them... that's a flag to me.
Here's my pair.
- 69
- 17
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2013
listen .. there are valid points here .. but also some indecisiveness .... ill say it again ... spin it however you want .. they are FAKE .. i dont need to go in to intimate details..
- 69
- 17
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2013
- 10,288
- 3,826
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
After seeing this I must agree. They def dont look the same.Im leaning towards GM.
-some of the stitching is off.
-toe box is shaped different.
-shoe tag under the tounge has the light border.
-Bar code numbers are different.
-Box sticker font. ( As someone stated earlier.)
Also, GS Royals did not come with extra laces. If the seller "lost" them... that's a flag to me.
Here's my pair.
Similar threads
