ADIDAS BOOST Thread - PAGE 1 for INFO- *NO BUYING/SELLING/TRADING*

How many 3.0s have you copped this year?

  • 0

    Votes: 17 22.1%
  • 1-2

    Votes: 33 42.9%
  • 3+

    Votes: 27 35.1%

  • Total voters
    77
  • Poll closed .
EQT + Boost = one giant HELLLLLL NO

they just dont look good to me. and they're really just gunna play off of the tannery 998 colors thats lazy.
Super Happy with my pairs. Still have yet to Un'DS the whites. Too many UBs in rotation.

In terms of comfort, these are a close 2nd to UBs (caged/uncaged).
 
 
Actually I think the boost midsole fits with the EQT model... It works to me

And they're tan/pink not mint/orange

I'll cop... Wonder how they fit tho!!!
With this EQT Boosts you're definitely going to want to go at least a half size down. A full size down if you don't have wide feet 
 
those EQTs colors look like Tannerys at first glance, and non of you are going to tell me otherwise :rofl:

and im glad you guys like the midsole. it still looks like poop to me.


*edit.... ok, side by side you can notice a difference. still very similar to me :lol:

View media item 2148029View media item 2148030
 
Last edited:
I like the EQTs. I wouldn't say it's a must. (At least not for me, need a break from all these releases) But I've got my eye on the lighter CW of the pack, especially if it ends up sitting (no clue, don't like to speculate). If only it was as split as it is in this thread, on release day.

My pair from the first gen:
View media item 2148031
 
I like the EQTs. I wouldn't say it's a must. (At least not for me, need a break from all these releases) But I've got my eye on the lighter CW of the pack, especially if it ends up sitting (no clue, don't like to speculate). If only it was as split as it is in this thread, on release day.

My pair from the first gen:
 
I would say they are worth copping if you find UBs snug (caged and/or uncaged) and at the time didn't have any other option but STs. Plus they were able to reach discounted prices since these were hype.

The silhouette on these are definitely better than STs but certain CWs make the silhouette look real Orthopedic Shoe. A la this year's triple white version of them and borderline that gray/pink.
 
$500 for size 10 Chalks on GOAT...  I can almost trade for 350s... Well, not really... 
roll.gif
 
UnDs'ed the Navy 1.0s and they got the same snugness to me as the core black 1.0s.

I've had this 'issue' with most of my black/royal and now navy knit pairs. Kind of a slight turn off. don't even tie any of them too.
 
 
UnDs'ed the Navy 1.0s and they got the same snugness to me as the core black 1.0s.

I've had this 'issue' with most of my black/royal and now navy knit pairs. Kind of a slight turn off. don't even tie any of them too.
My navy 1.0's come in on Thursday!! Hopefully they fit the same as the 1.0 whites.
 
 
My navy 1.0's come in on Thursday!! Hopefully they fit the same as the 1.0 whites.
hopefully they fit similar or just fit the same enough to not notice the difference.

My white 1.0 didn't feel as snug when I unDSed those and never really had a 'break-in' period with any UBs I've unDSed.

Maybe I just got the unlucky draw of coincidentally my cb 1.0 / royals 1.0 / navy 1.0. Or truly the darker knits feel slightly more snug.
 
Super Happy with my pairs. Still have yet to Un'DS the whites. Too many UBs in rotation.

In terms of comfort, these are a close 2nd to UBs (caged/uncaged).

View media item 2148018

How'd you size them, I know it says half size down from UBs but you also mentioned "if the UBs are snug" so is it size down half because UBs are snug and had to be sized up by half or half size down is just perfect length-wise?

But I got to say, with my high in-step and UBs less forgiving upper, I could fit in a size 9-10 without any problems and 10 while 9.5 is probably the sweet spot, 9 is the perfect length though and would be great if the upper were a little bit more pliable.
 
How'd you size them, I know it says half size down from UBs but you also mentioned "if the UBs are snug" so is it size down half because UBs are snug and had to be sized up by half or half size down is just perfect length-wise?

But I got to say, with my high in-step and UBs less forgiving upper, I could fit in a size 9-10 without any problems and 10 while 9.5 is probably the sweet spot, 9 is the perfect length though and would be great if the upper were a little bit more pliable.
Well it all depends of width of foot and/or length. I half down sized from my UB size for length. UBs have a more narrow toe box so my 2 thru 5th toe will almost hit the side of the toe box.

EQTs have a wider toe box so you don't have to .5sz up from your 'TTS'. Reason I quote that is because TTS is subjective to how folks want their shoes to feel. But with a .5sz down from UB, you'll get the same length as UBs, just more wiggle room in the Toe Box.
 
Dropped into a Champs real quick and as I'm looking around an employee says, "yo what size you wear bro?" (I guess because I'm wearing 3Ms). Caught off guard, I replied "10" and he says, "ah I got some size 10.5 creams I'm tryna sell."

Good business practice.
 
 
Dropped into a Champs real quick and as I'm looking around an employee says, "yo what size you wear bro?" (I guess because I'm wearing 3Ms). Caught off guard, I replied "10" and he says, "ah I got some size 10.5 creams I'm tryna sell."

Good business practice.
Depends if he selling the creams from the back or from his personal collection. Either way I would've went with it to find out if you should've told his/her manager of their side hustle.

Then that dude can resell shoes Full-Time.
 
Back
Top Bottom