NFL Discussion Thread: Pats win SB XLIX. Offseason begins

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think McNabb gets in. I had this debates few weeks ago and looked at his numbers. They're impressive as hell, much better than I expected.
 
So your telling me TD should go in the HOF because of that 4 year span? But Shauns great span lasted 5 years and was better and he doesn't deserve to go?

1,501 yards, 17 TD, 4.5 YPC and 93.8 Y/G with 37 catches for 269 yards and 2 more TDs.

That was his career average for those 5 years
 
Hutchinson and Jones made that soft *** dude look so much better than he actually was.

He's great at following blocks.
 
Last edited:
Chester McFloppy said:
Hutchinson and Jones made that soft *** dude look so much better than he actually was.

He's great at following blocks.
Click to expand...

Is that your only argument? He played behind arguably the best line for a couple years? But yall slurp dudes like Faulk and Terell Davis?
 
a55a5in11 said:
Is that your only argument? He played behind arguably the best line for a couple years? But yall slurp dudes like Faulk and Terell Davis?
Click to expand...

they actually won their teams something tho

and I mean Faulk might be the best all around running back of all time :lol:
 
Shaun Alexander was nice his 2005 season where he carried the Seahawks to the Super Bowl

But 2005 was the basically the only season, where he was recognized

I think Terrell Davis was better
 
Last edited:
Marshall Faulk was a complete RB and don't you ever use his name in vain again.

I mean, look at this ****





"Highlights." Had to stop watching it. The first 10 touchdowns were Soft Serve following blocks into the endzone from like 8 yards out.
 
Last edited:
:rofl:
so it's because you guys don't like how he ran. Yall can't deny his numbers though. And we're probably slurping him when you were kids
 
I mean Alexander didn't benefit from having All Pro's at QB, FB, OT and OG in 2005 or anything

I don't think you can say he "carried" that team to the Super Bowl
 
Shaun Alexander ain't even in the top tier of RBs from the 2000s. I'd take Holmes, Edge, Westbrook, Faulk, Portis, Tiki's fumblin' *** and LT over him. Probably left a few out, too.

He was good at scoring from the red zone -- no one will deny that. He follows blocks like Portis delivers them. That's about it.
 
StillIn729 said:
I mean Alexander didn't benefit from having All Pro's at QB, FB, OT and OG in 2005 or anything

I don't think you can say he "carried" that team to the Super Bowl
Click to expand...

And Faulk and TD did? Hell go ahead and name all these RB's who carried their team to a SB with a ****** line and Average QB
 
Chester McFloppy said:
Shaun Alexander ain't even in the top tier of RBs from the 2000s. I'd take Holmes, Edge, Westbrook, Faulk, Portis, Tiki's fumblin' *** and LT over him. Probably left a few out, too.

He was good at scoring from the red zone -- no one will deny that. He follows blocks like Portis delivers them. That's about it.
Click to expand...

So you think LaMichael James was overrated at Oregon?
 
Td was a much better running back then Shaun Alexander... Shaun Alexander easily the most overrated rb ...

Faulk was the most complete back... Dude was dope.. 1000 rush and rec in a year ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom