i think they used a diff paint or something on those models, can't remember exactly.
I been saying this for a few years now. Most people just on the bandwagon saying OG this and that but I like the cuts on most retro's. Casually they are more appropriate in cut. Quality wise they are less of what they were but they are not built for the court anymore. Alot of those OG's were tanks that were boot-like. Plus, am I the only one who notices that people always say OG this and that but will not buy OG's. "He got Game" OG are very reasonable but the sit all across the net. People just like fitting in. Give me retro's. Plus look at shoes like the Concord lows and Bred !!'s, people don't even value the opportunity to have them. Honestly if people were as "sneakerhead" as they claim. No Concord lows wouls be for sell. That shoe was never suppose to hit the public. And look what he current "sneaker community," did to that shoe.
gonna be honest, i would never like to see JB go back to the OG molds with the 3 and the 4.
i love how people forget that the tongues were disgusting on both, especially the 3. also not a fan of that very thin elephant print.
higher cut on the 4's also looks weird.
if we get 1999 4 shapes and 2001 3's then i'll be good
All the prices you quoted are upwards prices and Flightclub premium pricing. I see both models go for way cheaper on a daily basis. The point of my post is that the whole remastering thing is an attempt to answer or pacify the whole true to form "OG" outcry that has become the norm. Truth is I like retros better at this point and that coming from someone who starting wearing Jordans when the 3's where first released. I enjoy the OG colorways and some of the newer colorways but most importantly I love the cuts and shapes and the scaled back tongues.
I been saying this for a few years now. Most people just on the bandwagon saying OG this and that but I like the cuts on most retro's. Casually they are more appropriate in cut. Quality wise they are less of what they were but they are not built for the court anymore. Alot of those OG's were tanks that were boot-like. Plus, am I the only one who notices that people always say OG this and that but will not buy OG's. "He got Game" OG are very reasonable but the sit all across the net. People just like fitting in. Give me retro's. Plus look at shoes like the Concord lows and Bred !!'s, people don't even value the opportunity to have them. Honestly if people were as "sneakerhead" as they claim. No Concord lows wouls be for sell. That shoe was never suppose to hit the public. And look what he current "sneaker community," did to that shoe.
gonna be honest, i would never like to see JB go back to the OG molds with the 3 and the 4.
i love how people forget that the tongues were disgusting on both, especially the 3. also not a fan of that very thin elephant print.
higher cut on the 4's also looks weird.
if we get 1999 4 shapes and 2001 3's then i'll be good
saw these about a week ago on Sneakernews.. **** is fire. 2015 is shaping up to be an expensive year for me
son
Or how about the 13's dropping the past couple months for $185-$200?
Ya I saw that on sneakernews earlier. They're alright I guess.. but now my collection is going to have boxes that don't match lol
Ya I saw that on sneakernews earlier. They're alright I guess.. but now my collection is going to have boxes that don't match lol
cray
Ya I saw that on sneakernews earlier. They're alright I guess.. but now my collection is going to have boxes that don't match lol
I hear yeah, but it's the nature of the beast when you've been collecting long enough
Just is what it is.
I agrée with you on that point
bad news for fake factories... they'll have to "remaster" the new boxes!
bad news for fake factories... they'll have to "remaster" the new boxes!
og boxes were thicker and sturdier, too expensive for JB's today standards...
