- 87,993
- 46,886
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2000
Remastered? More like **** green
Air Jordan Retro IV "Teal" (03/14/15 $190)
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by drewswish,
- Start date
- 348
- 82
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2013
Looks OK to me.
AWOKEN CHARISMA
formerly monopolize
- 3,493
- 4,664
- Joined
- May 30, 2013
- 34
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2014
nike owns the rights to the original colorways so jordan must change them.
- 34
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2014
I know a lot of people atnt hyped up about this 4 but to me this is a must cop. It has that special thing about it. This 4 is sexy
- 189
- 73
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2009
Not to beat a dead horse, but?
This is one of the few models I just can no longer purchase unless they 'take it back'.
I purchased IV's in the past few years, I'm not claiming I'm above the cop. Just at the tipping point with this model now. Not really feelin'the CW either. Passed on the GG's as well. Blah.
Look at the pic. of those OG WC's. Then look at these again. I know it's BEEN said, but? The netting! The netting alone is reason enough to pass for me. I'm done w/IV's until such a time comes to pass. I'm usually not a stickler for shape either, but? Again, look at the OG. That shoe IS MEAN. All yellowed it still 'looks fast'. It's not JUST the extra high tongues that mess up the overall look of the newer IV's. The shape is off. Blah. Just my opinion.
I won't front, no high horse here, JB still owns my soul on a few models regardless of butchery. Just no longer IV's. Pass on these w/o question.
This is one of the few models I just can no longer purchase unless they 'take it back'.
I purchased IV's in the past few years, I'm not claiming I'm above the cop. Just at the tipping point with this model now. Not really feelin'the CW either. Passed on the GG's as well. Blah.
Look at the pic. of those OG WC's. Then look at these again. I know it's BEEN said, but? The netting! The netting alone is reason enough to pass for me. I'm done w/IV's until such a time comes to pass. I'm usually not a stickler for shape either, but? Again, look at the OG. That shoe IS MEAN. All yellowed it still 'looks fast'. It's not JUST the extra high tongues that mess up the overall look of the newer IV's. The shape is off. Blah. Just my opinion.
I won't front, no high horse here, JB still owns my soul on a few models regardless of butchery. Just no longer IV's. Pass on these w/o question.
- 4,718
- 421
- Joined
- May 6, 2007
Has potential... I'll need some real pics tho, all these photoshopped jawns that over emphasize the leather are worthless imo
- 2,138
- 1,019
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
What? Nike also owns JB.
- 3,678
- 2,080
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2005
I like these. I have the "green glows" and I like these more.
- 403
- 171
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2014
HOL UP HOL UP HOL UP
Y'all telling me...looks are subjective?
Unlike most people, I never had money to buy Jordans back then so I have no connection to OG colorways. I just buy **** based off how it looks, OG colorway or not.
Y'all telling me...looks are subjective?
Unlike most people, I never had money to buy Jordans back then so I have no connection to OG colorways. I just buy **** based off how it looks, OG colorway or not.
Last edited:
- 37,708
- 15,347
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2005
This. I remember about 10 years ago before this shoe was retroed, the fakes had that mesh straight when it was askew on the originals. I guess they didn't want to change itGuess they aren't going to fix the netting...
- 13,538
- 10,478
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2012
- 34
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2014
i thought the same until i found out after his 23 modle mj took over jordan and now only partners with nike
- 37,708
- 15,347
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2005
JB is a subsidiary company of Nike. Much like Hurley, Cole Haan...etc.
- 87,993
- 46,886
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2000
Oh god here we go again lol
- 87,993
- 46,886
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2000
Yea.....no
- 8,726
- 3,487
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2013
People still think Nike doesn't own JB?
- 2,376
- 1,032
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2011
easy pass
- 61
- 18
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2014
it looks okay. would only cop at an outlet
- 5,107
- 377
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
beautiful cw
too bad i don't buy pre xv retros any more :\
too bad i don't buy pre xv retros any more :\
- 87,993
- 46,886
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2000
probably been said already but this is supposed to be remastered and close to og form yet the mesh is still going the wrong way like fakes
- 34
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2014
nike owns the right to jordan but doesnt own jordan thats y jb has to change the colors and the names of the shoe. Also no swoosh on jordan shoesPeople still think Nike doesn't own JB?
- 1,404
- 1,377
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2003
There are swooshes on all Jordan 1's lol
- 34
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2014
nike owns the right to 1`s its really confusing
- 728
- 591
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2013
-Explain how Nike would own the RIGHTS to JB...but not Jordan Brand... You do know your statement made NO sense right?
-I don't get what you mean by the names of the shoe... Like nicknames? nicknames like "Fear 4s" or "Bred" are made up by the sneaker community... If you're talking about how Columbia Blue is now "Legend Blue" that doesn't have to do with Nike/Jordan whatsoever.
-"No Swoosh on Jordan Shoes" Have you not seen a Jordan 1?
Last edited:
