- 8,610
- 1,458
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2005
Just curious to what people think. I say 5 straight is slightly more impressive like I assume many others will but to win 5 over 15 years is quite the accomplishment
Which is more impressive: 5 straight championships or spread out over 15 years
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by gregzzy23,
- Start date
- 6,346
- 1,111
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2007
five straight is insane
domination
domination
- 32,701
- 38,330
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
5 straight for sure, its essentially the same core group.
5 in 15 years could have totally different groups in each championship. Not everyones a Timmay.
5 in 15 years could have totally different groups in each championship. Not everyones a Timmay.
- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
I see where this is going 
Mister Meaner
formerly super producer j
- 20,062
- 10,267
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2007
Enh, I'm gonna say 5 over 15. That's an organization that knows how to draft, doesn't get fleeced in trades & is probably always a contender in that time frame. There's no embarrassing 20-30 win seasons in that time frame (barring major injuries) so the fanbase should stay happy.
5 straight is impressive, no doubt.
5 straight is impressive, no doubt.
6 Rings G.O.A.T.
Supporter
- 133,342
- 111,392
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2006
5 straight is damn near impossible now!!
- 1,093
- 402
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
5 in 15 making the playoffs every year
or
5 straight then futility the next 10.
These should be the choices.
or
5 straight then futility the next 10.
These should be the choices.
6 Rings G.O.A.T.
Supporter
- 133,342
- 111,392
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2006
And 5 straight is already 5 in 15 years..
shatterkneesinc
Banned
- 22,524
- 2,383
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
2x 3 peats in the same decade
or 5 straight
is the better question
or 5 straight
is the better question
- 14,385
- 16,679
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
Maaaaan, I'm tryna see my trailblazerz win only one in my lifetime bruh...
- 21,800
- 30,444
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
Winning 6 in the 90s or 11 in 50/60s?
6 in the 90s. Cats back then were garbage. Check tape.
Winning 6 in the 90s or 11 in 50/60s?
6 in the 90s. Cats back then were garbage. Check tape.
So.... 5 in 2000s >>>> 6 in 90s?
- 11,114
- 3,728
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2008
back to back is hard let alone 3 or 5-peat
- 25,580
- 18,468
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2003
it doesnt matter really because 5 chips is 5 chips.. but to answer your question 5 straight
- 21,800
- 30,444
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
Nope. NBA basketball peaked in the 90s. The rules have changed so much. Everything is flagrant now. Dudes r butter soft. Plus nobody was coming straight out of hs it was a league of vets and grown men. And think about all the talent of the Jordan era compared to now.
Last edited:
- 53,163
- 20,709
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
This recent era has some good talent too.
Last edited:
- 8,715
- 5,390
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2013
Depends.....5 straight would mean the team had an era. They were ok, they peaked, they go back to being ok.
5 over 15 years means the team is pretty dependable. Usually gets far and every so often goes all the way.
Depends on what you prefer
5 over 15 years means the team is pretty dependable. Usually gets far and every so often goes all the way.
Depends on what you prefer
Doing 5 straight doesn't mean anything. Nowhere in OP specifically states that the team peaked.
A team could win 5 straight, then lose next year, then win again after that.
