Street justice for this carjacker in San Diego

I prefer it being a realist.

Let someone try and carjack your mother and a younger relative of yours and put their lives in danger. I guess the proper response would be to tell the criminal to please stop.

This is the real world. For every action there's a reaction.
 
That car jacker was probably going to rape and kill that women and child.. Those men did a good service! And then he want to talk stuff after the police is around, should had beat him to a pulp when they had the chance
 
Yall worried bout these guys shoes? :lol: , in real life the person makes the shoes not the shoes make the person. Whether these guys were wearing 5 dollar flip flops or some balenciagas they get my respect for stepping up and defending a helpless lady and her child. Let homie with the And 1's on cook :smokin
 
Cedric Ceballos said:
I prefer it being a realist.

Let someone try and carjack your mother and a younger relative of yours and put their lives in danger. I guess the proper response would be to tell the criminal to please stop.

This is the real world. For every action there's a reaction.
Click to expand...

The proper response certainly isn't to beat them in the head until they are deceased.

What part of being a realist involves the police brutalizing an already subdued and beaten man who is clearly not resisting and hadn't been for some time?

I think the word you were looking for was sadist, not realist.
 
That guy that helped the police officer restrain the carjacker should get charged with interferring with police business. :nerd:
 
Na, you put a persons loved ones in danger and whatever violent response you get as a result of it is warranted. There's a thing called anger and rage and when you cross a certain line you deserve whatever response you get.

Guess a child molester shouldn't be beaten to a bloody pulp if he's caught red handed in the act as well. Just let the police do their job right?
 
Cedric Ceballos said:
Na, you put a persons loved ones in danger and whatever violent response you get as a result of it is warranted. There's a thing called anger and rage and when you cross a certain line you deserve whatever response you get.

Guess a child molester shouldn't be beaten to a bloody pulp if he's caught red handed in the act as well. Just let the police do their job right?
Click to expand...
I just can't fathom how someone would just stand outside a door and say" i'm gonna let you grope my son/daughter but when the cops get here you are in big trouble"
 
jbc908 said:
I just can't fathom how someone would just stand outside a door and say" i'm gonna let you grope my son/daughter but when the cops get here you are in big trouble"
Click to expand...

According to some niketalkers if you beat the daylights out of them, after they were subdued, you'd be a violent sadist even though you caught them red handed touching a little kid.

Niketalk devils advocate, argue just to argue logic I guess though.
 
Cedric Ceballos said:
jbc908 said:
I just can't fathom how someone would just stand outside a door and say" i'm gonna let you grope my son/daughter but when the cops get here you are in big trouble"
Click to expand...

According to some niketalkers if you beat the daylights out of them, after they were subdued, you'd be a violent sadist even though you caught them red handed touching a little kid.

Niketalk devils advocate, argue just to argue logic I guess though.
Click to expand...

Just going off your last few post in this thread you got NO business talking about NT logic bro :lol:
 
Last edited:
Cedric Ceballos said:
Na, you put a persons loved ones in danger and whatever violent response you get as a result of it is warranted. There's a thing called anger and rage and when you cross a certain line you deserve whatever response you get.

Guess a child molester shouldn't be beaten to a bloody pulp if he's caught red handed in the act as well. Just let the police do their job right?
Click to expand...

Civilized people learn to control their anger/rage, which you clearly can't/are not. So I ask myself why am I even having this discussion with you?

Fortunately for us all what people like you considered warranted and just means absolutely nothing outside of the underdeveloped organ in your skull.

Is this thread about child molestation? Cause I thought it was a thread about killing people for trying to steal a car. My bad.
 
It's not about controlling your anger. If my family's life is in danger, I will eliminate that danger. Plain and simple.
 
zapatohead408 said:
It's not about controlling your anger. If my family's life is in danger, I will eliminate that danger. Plain and simple.
Click to expand...

I saw a man bloodied, on the ground, restrained. I didn't see anyone's family in danger. To say it's warranted to beat that man to death at that point then hide behind some weak *** self defense claim says a lot about that particular person.

We are talking about revenge killing in here. Not self defense, let's be honest.
 
Comedic victim mentality.

That we are the world, let the police handle everything mindset is funny.

Bet this dude wouldn't try to go carjacking in a more gun friendly state though.

The minute you mess with someone's family all rationalization goes out the window.

People die every day, alot of people who don't deserve it. I'm not going to waste an ounce of sympathy on a criminal savage. Any person who's willing to try and rob a car with a mother and innocent child in it deserves whatever violent result they get.

Just out of curiousity though. What would you do if someone smacked your mom in front of you and spit in her face? Would you practice this calm, restrained 'civilized' no rage mindset? I'm just curious because you should control your emotions right?
 
i think a good beat down would've definitely been warranted in this case since it dealt with this scum trying to car jack an innocent woman and child :smh:
i applaud these dudes from restraining themselves from not beating the **** out of this clown worse than they did
 
Yeah I can applaud the restraint but had they beat him up worse it wouldn't be any sympathy from me and shouldn't be any sympathy for him.

Hopefully the justice system does its job now and that guy doesn't see freedom for a very long time.
 
Cedric Ceballos said:
Yeah I can applaud the restraint but had they beat him up worse it wouldn't be any sympathy from me and shouldn't be any sympathy for him.

Hopefully the justice system does its job now and that guy doesn't see freedom for a very long time.
Click to expand...
I have a feeling you would love living in a place like Iran.
 
Na I'm tolerant towards gay people and not really big on censorship chief.

If having no sympathy towards a scumbag who put an innocent woman and her child's life in danger with no regards to their safety makes me extreme in the eyes of some niketalkers then so be it.

If that ladies husband were to blow the carjackers brains out it would've been deserved. You don't mess with a persons wife or kids.
 
It has nothing to do with sympathy and everything to do with morality.
 
All morals go out the window the minute you break into a car with a mother and her young child in it and try to carjack it.
 
Cedric Ceballos said:
All morals go out the window the minute you break into a car with a mother and her young child in it and try to carjack it.
Click to expand...
that's the point though, he was trying to take the car. not rape the mother or do something crazy along those lines. *** whippin was enough in that scenario.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom