yall are something else.
Russell has one bad game and the usual suspects are posting
The fact yall refuse to just say you guys hate everything Seattle is weird also
Sorry, I didn't know responding to 2 posts by someone on a discussion forum is considered being on their jock these days...
Truth is this "Typical haters out tonight after SEA loss :rollin", "Last week people gave him props but it was followed by 'buttttt'", "I cant believe theres not a 'Russell Wilson haters unite' thread" shtick is getting stale as hell. Pabs didn't seem to have a problem admitting that Russ was below average yesterday... Take those " haters gonna hate" posts back to the SEA thread.
I'd be surprised if most people in here didn't really like Russell Wilson, but again any bad mouthing or saying he sucked yesterday will be "yall just hate everything Seattle". Okay...
I love Russy, by far my favorite player on that team, was my guy when he was at Wisky too... Won me a lot of money a few years ago steamrolling the competition.
We can discuss it.
I find it interesting that becomes a "knock" on Rodgers that hes got a 'poor' record in close games.
But when you're record is 65-35 career and 22 of those L's came in games decided by less than a TD... Shouldn't that be a good thing? It's certainly a better overall record than most during that time span and in all but 13 of his first 100 games ended within a TD.
What percentage of those close games would he have needed to win to make him "clutch" in the eyes of those making the argument?