Homeowner shoots intruder who was not pregnant...

Look, Stillin...I like you.  You're a good poster, but I see what people mean when they say you're a master deflector.

This is approaching ninjahood-level thickheadedness.

agreed man; we just have differing opinions and mine is def. not gonna change and neither is yours; all good in my book :lol:
 
Last edited:
 
You're not getting it.


What I'm saying is: hypothetically, if you were in his situation and had a gun, would you have done what he did?


I mean...."all bets are off," right?


what am I not getting? I can't say what I would do in that situation but considering I don't have a gun nor ever have it's hard to place myself in it


do you want to keep typing the same thing out and over and over until you hear the answer you prefer?


put me on a jury and I would most likely find the dude not guilty
Look, Stillin...I like you.  You're a good poster, but I see what people mean when they say you're a master deflector.

This is approaching ninjahood-level thickheadedness.

Because he doesn't agree with your point?
 
Unlike Fl, In California, if I'm not mistaking... you are not allowed to pursue someone no matter what. Girl plus the baby... that's double murder. But he's 80, so who knows. But, dude was no longer in danger once they left.
 
 
 
 
You're not getting it.


What I'm saying is: hypothetically, if you were in his situation and had a gun, would you have done what he did?


I mean...."all bets are off," right?

what am I not getting? I can't say what I would do in that situation but considering I don't have a gun nor ever have it's hard to place myself in it


do you want to keep typing the same thing out and over and over until you hear the answer you prefer?


put me on a jury and I would most likely find the dude not guilty
Look, Stillin...I like you.  You're a good poster, but I see what people mean when they say you're a master deflector.

This is approaching ninjahood-level thickheadedness.
Because he doesn't agree with your point?
It has more to do with the fact that he won't answer my question.  

Either way, he's still a good dude.  No hard feelings (hopefully).
 
Last edited:
old man was trippin...

should've shot her on the leg, demobilizing her.

Then he should've sprinted to the nearest drug store and purchased a pregnancy test.

Have her pee on the stick to confirm pregnancy.

+
= don't shoot

[COLOR=#red]-[/COLOR] = shoot
 
 
You're running on the assumption that it's justified because "they might come back."  Which is, again, nothing more than conjecture...and you can't use overwhelming force when it's based off of an assumption.  A fairly ridiculous assumption, at that.
this was the 2nd time this has happened. not saying it as her both times but who knows
 
you have been pointing out the fact that he's 80 a few times. If it was an able bodied 30 year old that chased her down in the alley, would you keep mentioning his age? or feel as badly for him?

but what the hell does that have to do with anything? you can't just erase facts from a story

in all likelihood he was robbed because he was considered an easy target
 
you have been pointing out the fact that he's 80 a few times. If it was an able bodied 30 year old that chased her down in the alley, would you keep mentioning his age? or feel as badly for him?

but what the hell does that have to do with anything? you can't just erase facts from a story

in all likelihood he was robbed because he was considered an easy target

because people are getting clouded by bias, both ways. " Oh crippled old man was violated" " Pregnant innocent girl was gunned down". facts a man chased home invaders down into an alley and executed one of them
 
So what Im getting from JJ is that ild people are allowed to be vigilantes

and you came to this conclusion, how?

you have been pointing out the fact that he's 80 a few times. If it was an able bodied 30 year old that chased her down in the alley, would you keep mentioning his age? or feel as badly for him?

See below.

you have been pointing out the fact that he's 80 a few times. If it was an able bodied 30 year old that chased her down in the alley, would you keep mentioning his age? or feel as badly for him?

but what the hell does that have to do with anything? you can't just erase facts from a story

in all likelihood he was robbed because he was considered an easy target

Thank you.
 
If anything the fact that she was pregnant should not be factored into the story, the mans age is relevant for the reason mentioned above. She was more than willing to risk endangering her child by attempting a robbery and was aware of the risks, but did it anyway. The man was a law abiding citizen who was ambushed and unwillingly put into this situation, a situation that could have very easily ended his life
 
Last edited:
so hold up...

this was the 3rd time these people robbed him?

Another neighbor said the homeowner has been the target of several break-ins in the past year.

Key word.

“I remember the first break-in. They literally tore down the front door,” said the male neighbor, who did not give his name. “And that’s where I came in and met him. I said, ‘Hey, what’s going on? Are you ok?’ And ever since then, you know, we’ve been acquaintances.”

The neighbor added the couple could be the same one that stole his car.

“Apparently the couple has been doing this neighborhood for quite some time,” he said.

Neighbors fear they targeted the man because he was older.

Link
 
“Apparently the couple has been doing this neighborhood for quite some time,”

but once they run the its ok. let them be
eyes.gif
 
There is a reason the names aren't put in the article because it will make everyone see just how much of a couple scumbags they are
 
I thought if someone dies as a result of you committing a crime then you get charged, so wouldn't the boyfriend get charged?
 
You assume risks when you take on certain activities. Robbing people's houses you know there's a good chance you can get ya head blown off.

Just because she happened to get a few feet away from his property he's supposed to miraculously switch from vengeful rage to oh I guess she'll never come back now and go back in the house? This ain't no GTA code. Ain't nobody stopping abruptly in the heat of the moment.

Y'all don't hold cops to this high of a regard let's not ask an 80 year old victim to just let people rob him and run away.
 
It kinda does. If I chased somebody 4 blocks before I caught up to them and killed them, would you say it was an ok kill?

What's the difference between 4 blocks and 60 feet?

There's a difference but I'm not gonna argue semantics here. I'm not even saying that pops is 100% justified, but that is a potential consequence of the act commited.

No he wouldn't. You're allowed only if they're retreating with your property that they've stolen in hand and you don't believe you can recover it otherwise.

Ok. I've heard differently. Same thing in my eyes but not in the eyes of the law.

The real lesson here is don't rob people. If life has lead you down the path where that is your only option (which I do call BS) understand the potential results of it. The only person I feel sorry for is the child.
 
Last edited:
 
huh? and would you feel the same way if the girl was your sister?
well I wouldn't associate with them if that was how they acted so that is right out the window

pretty sure my girl won't be robbing houses anytime soon
@StillIn729  maybe you addressed this and I simply missed it, but I don't see the point of saying if it was your grandfather, would you feel the same.

Also to the second quote, what if you were oblivious to your girl's behavior and she robbed a house and got killed like this lady did? You would disassociate yourself from her, right? That's why I'm confused about your first point about the grandfather. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I see this dude shot cashbanks' grammar also.
roll.gif
 @CashBanks  is still good people
It absolutely changes everything if they were retreating and he didnt fire on his own property. Period
Yep
Lol abortion is legal yet people still talk about how the baby is a victim. Why is it a baby now and not a fetus? Because its useful for liberals to attack guns? Yep.

Anyway he did what he had the right to do. Dont mess with people's homes.
Abortion has nothing to do with this.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom