Homeowner shoots intruder who was not pregnant...

if you cant understand

"Hope all you want I mean that from the bottom of my heart"

that's your issue not mine

dudes are just followers on here is all they see one knucklehead hating and wanna join in

dummy see, dummy do
Good grief, you might be the most sensitive dude I've come across in my 10 years here. 100% serious.

Just let it go. We literally tried being nice about it. No shots fired at all. And you're still getting hurt.
 
breaking into people's homes while pregnant huh?

I mean this scenario must've crossed her mind before...

dumb people :smh:
 
Last edited:
Shame on OP for not posting the most important part of the story.


When I went in there, they tackled me," Greer told NBC4 Wednesday. "Both of them jumped up on top of me."

The intruders, a man and woman, may have underestimated Greer, he said, as they ransacked his safe and yanked the door open right in front of him.

The intruders threw Greer to the ground, but they didn't know he'd gotten his .22-caliber Smith and Wesson revolver.

"I come back and they see me with a gun, and they run," he said.

The man escaped, but the woman fell after being struck by Greer's gunfire in an alley behind the house.

"She says, 'Don't shoot me, I'm pregnant! I'm going to have a baby!' And I shot her anyway," Greer said.

When asked what he saw happen to the woman after he fired shots, Greer responded: "She was dead. I shot her twice, she best be dead ... (The man) had run off and left her."


yea this last part is extremely disturbing. burglary aside, he shoots her dead after she pleads for her life and her alleged baby's. and finishes it with good riddance.

sigh, we aren't anymore civilized than the "savagery" the media portrays in countries in the middle east, or africa. carry on with the gun debate/she had it coming debate.
 
Last edited:
dump people
mean.gif
Old dude did dump on people hahaha. Full clips.
 
 
There's personal feelings, then there's the court of law.  At the end of the day the court of law rules out or overrules personal feelings. 
So you if this is grandpa Deuce; you are gonna say lock him up?
I wouldn't say lock up grandpa Deuce, but like I said at the end of the day the court of law is what matters most, that is all I'm saying.  The jury might take my personal feelings into account if I was a witness for his trial, but the law is the law. 

To me, he had every right to chase the woman down and perhaps even shoot her to keep her on the ground until the cops arrived.  Shooting to KILL her at point blank range however, when you yourself are not in danger and neither of you are on your property is where things can be a bit dicey for this elderly man. 
 
I miss commas all the time but not when it completely changes how my post is supposed to sound.
You don't have to be a stickler for perfect grammar. Just aware of little things like that.

For the record I understood what he said. I can just also see how someone might not have been able to.


We literally had no idea what he meant. So we asked him that we couldn't understand and if he could clarify. Then dude got butthurt and started going off.

I see this dude shot cashbanks' grammar also.

move on

or is it just me that should stop talking about it?
 
Last edited:
laugh.gif
@ the man baiting them on to his property. NT, bruh...NT
laugh.gif


*edit*

No one knows if she was indeed pregnant...it was just something she said before getting shot.
So she may have not been prego?

I dont feel sorry for any of them anyways
 
Last edited:
^

First shot is justifiable.

Second shot when she's on the floor and not moving.

Eh.

This is what I'm saying, he had all rights to fire that first shot

once she's no longer a threat, go back in the crib lock the door, and call the fuzz

Gramps was upset he had been targeted before and wanted to make a statement

Can't blame him but it's still wrong
 
I understood exactly what CashBanks said due to what Mr Marcus said before that and I don't even agree with his opinion in this thread.

If you're an adult of normal intelligence you can use context clues and understand what someone is saying/meant even if they don't use 100% correct punctuation.

Y'all some real nerds sometimes I swear.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't say lock up grandpa Deuce, but like I said at the end of the day the court of law is what matters most, that is all I'm saying.  The jury might take my personal feelings into account if I was a witness for his trial, but the law is the law. 

To me, he had every right to chase the woman down and perhaps even shoot her to keep her on the ground until the cops arrived.  Shooting to KILL her at point blank range however, when you yourself are not in danger and neither of you are on your property is where things can be a bit dicey for this elderly man. 

^

First shot is justifiable.

Second shot when she's on the floor and not moving.

Eh.

Exactly, and he himself just might get in trouble for it now.
 
But anyways to be on topic...

I'M AN 80 YEAR OLD MAN.

And you young whipper snappers gonna come in MY home, push me down, and Rob me. Then get mad when I use the great equalizer?

Think of it like that...
 
But anyways to be on topic...

I'M AN 80 YEAR OLD MAN.

And you young whipper snappers gonna come in MY home, push me down, and Rob me. Then get mad when I use the great equalizer?

Think of it like that...
And you're gonna get convicted when you chase them down and use unwarranted, overwhelming force after the threat is gone.

No one is saying they're "mad," they're simply saying that killing someone that's already down after running away isn't exactly self-defense.

Why is this so hard to understand?
 
It's still under investigation because it's yet to be determined how far he chased the woman down...

...the chase is the part that harms him - if the assailant retreated, you're no longer defending yourself.

Depending on what the cops determine, he could either walk, or face voluntary manslaughter.
 
And you're gonna get convicted when you chase them down and use unwarranted, overwhelming force after the threat is gone.

No one is saying they're "mad," they're simply saying that killing someone that's already down after running away isn't exactly self-defense.

Why is this so hard to understand?

Son. My dude turned 40 years old twice. Most of us on this site are 10+ years away from turning 40 once, he too old for the fuk ish.

The only one I really feel sorry for is the ALLEGED unborn baby (still under speculation, could've just been saying it to save her own ***).

Now if it's really true that she was pregnant, THAT'S WHERE THE COURTS GET HIM. He could possibly get off with self defense for killing the woman but if they decide to count the unborn fetus as a life (which they should in my opinion) then yes he technically did commit murder.
 
shouldve never broken into dudes house
shouldve not chased after the burglars
unfortunate situation all around.
 
It's still under investigation because it's yet to be determined how far he chased the woman down...

...the chase is the part that harms him - if the assailant retreated, you're no longer defending yourself.

Depending on what the cops determine, he could either walk, or face voluntary manslaughter.

This also, if he "chased" her to right outside his doorstep then that really ain't no chase and she would technically still be on his property.
 
 
And you're gonna get convicted when you chase them down and use unwarranted, overwhelming force after the threat is gone.

No one is saying they're "mad," they're simply saying that killing someone that's already down after running away isn't exactly self-defense.

Why is this so hard to understand?
Son. My dude turned 40 years old twice. Most of us on this site are 10+ years away from turning 40 once, he too old for the fuk ish.

The only one I really feel sorry for is the ALLEGED unborn baby (still under speculation, could've just been saying it to save her own ***).

Now if it's really true that she was pregnant, THAT'S WHERE THE COURTS GET HIM. He could possibly get off with self defense for killing the woman but if they decide to count the unborn fetus as a life (which they should in my opinion) then yes he technically did commit murder.
So dude should get a pass for killing someone because of his age?

Pregnant or not, the threat was gone and the killing was unwarranted.  I don't care if he was 80 or 18. Dude was looking to exact his revenge.  Didn't have to go down that way.
 
Lemme quote this again

The man escaped, but the woman fell after being struck by Greer's gunfire in an alley behind the house.

"She says, 'Don't shoot me, I'm pregnant! I'm going to have a baby!' And I shot her anyway," Greer said.

When asked what he saw happen to the woman after he fired shots, Greer responded: "She was dead. I shot her twice, she best be dead ... (The man) had run off and left her."
 
People aren't realizing that you can feel the robbers and the old man are both wrong. They shouldn't have done what they did and of they would've been shot in the act I wouldn't have a problem. But when you chase after them, wound them and then finish a begging person off, for robbing your house, I'm not going to think it's ok.

He executed her. I don't think scum who rob houses or scum who execute people should be walking free.

And to Stillin. If my grandfather executed somebody and then had no remorse about it, I'd look and feel completely different towards him.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom