Pranksters intentionally provoke physical altercations vol "in the hood"

Those cornball provocateurs deserved everything that was handed to them...:smh:

At the end of the day though, pranking is not a crime; assault, however, is.

The victims need to exercise some chill before they get locked up. No need to throw hands for every lil thing. Simply walk away from the provocation and nonsense.




...
 
Last edited:
Saw this video yesterday. It's crazy how hostile some people are. A lot of it was warranted though.
 
- "in the hood"
- looking like food
- trolling urban youths

outcome is predictable every single time :lol:
 
Saw this video yesterday. It's crazy how hostile some people are. A lot of it was warranted though.
Random dude comes up to you to disrespect the hell out of you.

"It's crazy how hostile some people are."
 
I've seen all their videos and to be honest some of the reactions are that of a person who's just naturally violent and almost instinctively resorts to violence at even the most slightest annoyance and that says lot about the person reacting. That's not everyone though because obviously they mess with alot of people but only post the videos where they get a crazy reaction.

The videos where they were snatching phones and farting on people, they deserved to get hands put on them. You don't invade someone's personal space like that and expect nothing to happen.

Stuff like the selfie prank where the dude was quick to swing on him, that guy is just naturally violent and has no self restraint. You can't just swing on someone because you think their taking a pic of you.

End of the day though, if you fart on someone or take their phone. You deserve whatever reaction you get.

I wonder how that birdbrain Michelle Beadle would feel about the word "provoke" being used to describe what the pranksters are doing and the reactions they get though.
 
I can't imagine all the people they pranked signed releases so that they could put the video up on Youtube.
 
I would say it's crazy how quick it escalates to violence.
A random dude walks up to you while you're tying your shoes and sticks your head in his butt and farts right in your face.

"it's crazy how quick it escalates to violence."
 
 
A random dude walks up to you while you're tying your shoes and sticks your head in his butt and farts right in your face.

"it's crazy how quick it escalates to violence."
Not all situations in the video are on par with other, but I stand by my original statement. 
 
 
A random dude walks up to you while you're tying your shoes and sticks your head in his butt and farts right in your face.

"it's crazy how quick it escalates to violence."
Don't give me that bull ****, man. This video only focuses on the worst pranks and things they've done that absolutely did warrant violence, as opposed to the countless clips from all their videos where their actions didn't warrant violence, but they were attacked anyways. You can't tell me that a majority of the people in these videos aren't products of destructive environments. I can see justification of violence for most of the 'pranks' in this video, but what about the rest?
 
Last edited:
^I'm not here to do a back and forth.

The dudes making the videos want those types of reactions.

They wouldn't be continuing to make said vids otherwise.

Those reactions generate views(money), which is why they do even dumber "pranks" in their next videos.

Given that I'm not going to argue about the justification of violence.
 
these pranksters should take some boxing lessons so they can slip and dodge punches, get into a fighting stance and see where it goes from there
 
Back
Top Bottom