Real philosophy question vol. shouldn'a slept in class

15,108
15,687
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
I was barely awake in my college Philosophy course, so bare with me. I remember my professor saying that there was a philosopher ( or group of philosophers) that believed that ideas/thoughts/ inventions are just free flowing through the universe/time and space and we as humans act as receptors and inherit this info/ knowledge/ idea.

I think the concept was illustrating that no ideas original. We dont generate these ideas, just receive and decide to execute them or disregard.

Can anyone tell me which philosopher(s) introduced or subscribe to this concept?
 
I was barely awake in my college Philosophy course, so bare with me. I remember my professor saying that there was a philosopher ( or group of philosophers) that believed that ideas/thoughts/ inventions are just free flowing through the universe/time and space and we as humans act as receptors and inherit this info/ knowledge/ idea.

I think the concept was illustrating that no ideas original. We dont generate these ideas, just receive and decide to execute them or disregard.

Can anyone tell me which philosopher(s) introduced or subscribe to this concept?

John Locke or Bertrand Russell?

Or just man up the next time you have class and ask your Prof. :nerd:
 
They might've been referring to Plato's Theory of Forms or other philosophers views on it or how they built upon that.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-metaphysics/#3

Could also be John Locke's theories on simple and complex ideas perhaps. I'd need to know more about what you remembered about the discussion to be more sure.

EDIT

If you go googling I'd actually suggest to avoid the stanford links cuz they are way more advanced in description than they need to be to explain to ppl in layman's terms.
 
Last edited:
They might've been referring to Plato's Theory of Forms or other philosophers views on it or how they built upon that.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-metaphysics/#3

Could also be John Locke's theories on simple and complex ideas perhaps. I'd need to know more about what you remembered about the discussion to be more sure.

EDIT

If you go googling I'd actually suggest to avoid the stanford links cuz they are way more advanced in description than they need to be to explain to ppl in layman's terms.
Exactly what came to mind. This might be what you mean. I also recommend looking up Plato's Cave.
 
They might've been referring to Plato's Theory of Forms or other philosophers views on it or how they built upon that.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-metaphysics/#3


Could also be John Locke's theories on simple and complex ideas perhaps. I'd need to know more about what you remembered about the discussion to be more sure.


EDIT


If you go googling I'd actually suggest to avoid the stanford links cuz they are way more advanced in description than they need to be to explain to ppl in layman's terms.

Exactly what came to mind. This might be what you mean. I also recommend looking up Plato's Cave.
That Cave is something serious bruh :pimp: I apply that to so much ****. No surprise it's in so much fiction from books to movies.

That story and the veil of ignorance set me straight. Stuff like that is why I love philosophy and how it reasserts logic and reason from different perspectives.
 
Yeah, philosophy was one if my subjects a few yearsago. I like how it's ever-changing and is never end all be all. Kant, Socrates, n Marx are among my favorites, but Plato is that dude.

The Cave was so eye opening. It was one of those aha moments when I read it. N his Forms n Ideas is too raw.
 
Im not sure of the original philosopher that came up with that theory but its the exact same thing that Napoleon Hill talks about in Think and Grow Rich.
Ideas being the most valuable resource in the world as everything started first with an idea.
 
Back
Top Bottom