Federal Study Shows Black Drivers 31% More Likely To Be Pulled Over Than White Ones

32,632
11,781
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
[h1]You really can get pulled over for driving while black, federal statistics show[/h1]
Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share via Email

More Options

Resize Text

Print Article

Comments 118

By Christopher Ingraham September 9

2814882133_3e8996a5a0_o-800x534.jpg

 

One in every 10 American drivers was pulled over for a traffic violation in 2011, according to a Justice Department report released last year. As The Washington Post reports this week, traffic stops for minor infractions such as speeding or equipment violations are increasingly used as a pretext for officers to seize cash from drivers. So it's worth asking: Who's getting pulled over, and for what?

The Justice Department statistics, based on the Police-Public Contact Survey, show that "relatively more black drivers (12.8%) than white (9.8%) and Hispanic (10.4%) drivers were pulled over in a traffic stop during their most recent contact with police." Or, to frame it another way: A black driver is about 31 percent more likely to be pulled over than a white driver, or about 23 percent more likely than a Hispanic driver. "Driving while black" is, indeed, a measurable phenomenon.

dwb-800x683.jpg


It's worth noting, however, that American Indian drivers are even more likely to be pulled over (15 percent). And since these are only national-level figures, rates are likely to be higher or lower depending on local law enforcement practices.

People of different races get pulled over for different reasons. While speeding is the most common reason for a traffic stop among all races, white people (50.1 percent) are more likely to get pulled over for speeding than blacks (37.7 percent) or Hispanics (39.2 percent). Relative to other races, blacks are more likely to get pulled over for vehicle defects or record checks. Perhaps most troubling from a civil liberties perspective, nearly five percent of blacks weren't given any reason for why they were stopped, compared with 2.6 percent of whites and 3.3 percent of Hispanics.

pulledover-800x683.jpg


White drivers were significantly less likely to be searched than black or Hispanic drivers. This comports with the Post's investigation, which suggests  that most of the drivers subject to searches and cash seizures are minorities.

search.jpg


Perhaps not surprisingly, there were racial differences in the perceived fairness of traffic stops. The survey showed that 67.5 percent of black motorists stopped by police said the reason for the stop was legitimate, compared with 73.6 percent of Hispanics and 83.6 percent of whites. In general, people of all races were more likely to say the stop was legitimate when the officer who pulled them over was of the same race.

Overall, these numbers shed some light on how black and white communities can have starkly different views of the law enforcement agencies that serve them. Black drivers are 31 percent more likely to be pulled over than whites; they are more than twice as likely to be subject to police searches as white drivers; and they are nearly twice as likely to not be given any reason for the traffic stop, period. These numbers undergird much of the racial differences in responses to events like last month's shooting and protests in Ferguson, Mo.
 
Last edited:
I like the fact that the Justice Department did this study and released the results. I'm at work butwhen I have more time I'll post my thoughts.
 
That's why window tints should be fully legal. To hide the identity of the driver until he or she is accused of a traffic violation, without ensuring that race was a reason why.

And also for privacy. But it's ironic that having tints will get you pulled over too, (at least in my state).
 
That's why window tints should be fully legal. To hide the identity of the driver until he or she is accused of a traffic violation, without ensuring that race was a reason why.

And also for privacy. But it's ironic that having tints will get you pulled over too, (at least in my state).


While it's a great concept. Imagine being a cop. You pull over a car for speeding with jet black tint on their windows. You walk up to the car ask driver to roll down the window and you are greeted by a 9mm to the face just won't work for safety.
 
Last edited:
While it's a great concept. Imagine being a cop. You pull over a car for speeding with jet black tint on their windows. You walk up to the car ask driver to roll down the window and you are greeted by a 9mm to the face just won't work for safety.

While that's a great theoretical example, imagine the real world. A cop pulls over a car for speeding with absolutely no tint. The only thing known to the officer at the time of the stop are the details of the vehicle (doesn't change with tint) and a very basic and crude description of the driver. The cop walks up to the car, asks the driver to roll down their window, and is greeted by a 9mm to the face because the driver had it tucked in the driver side door, rather than in his lap.

Tint doesn't magically give criminals the ability to do anything new. If someone is debating about killing a cop, tint won't be the deciding factor. A lack of tint doesn't he necessary prevent criminals from hiding things, either -- which is why many states have made it illegal to have secret compartments in your car.
http://www.wkyc.com/story/news/local/2013/11/20/trap-car-law/3655713/

No, the real reason why tints aren't allowed is two fold:

1. The ability to profile. Cops profile based on a lot of different factors (and I believe race is one) to try to find suspicious people. Tint makes this more difficult for cops to do.

2. The ability to ticket using cameras. People can already fight tickets from traffic cams, but tint would make it impossible for police to prove anything with the cameras alone.

There are safety concerns as well, such as not being able to see the driver and therefore not knowing if they see you, but that's really a moot point. Tints illegal simply because it makes an officer's job more difficult, not because of an increased risk of danger.
 
We knew this already, thread starter. What can we do about this? Nothing. Can't change how people think
 
Not at all saying race isn't a major factor, but do you guys think the cars themselves are attributable to the profiling statistic?

I'm sure a real ragged looking car earns more attention from cops than a nice, well kept one. Or perhaps a modified car (rims, stereo, exhaust, tints) stands out to a cop more than a bone stock one.

Consider the difference between a bright yellow sports car vs dark grey sedan in traffic, certain cars earn attention and may have certain stigmas assigned to them, fair or not.

Also not saying any type of cars belongs to any particular race, just saying its likely a variable significant enough to consider..
 
Last edited:
Not at all saying race isn't a major factor, but do you guys think the cars themselves are attributable to the profiling statistic?

I'm sure a real ragged looking car earns more attention from cops than a nice, well kept one. Or perhaps a modified car (rims, stereo, exhaust, tints) stands out to a cop more than a bone stock one.

Consider the difference between a bright yellow sports car vs dark grey sedan in traffic, certain cars earn attention and may have certain stigmas assigned to them, fair or not.

Also not saying any type of cars belongs to any particular race, just saying its likely a variable significant enough to consider..
Where im from youll get stopped quicker if you are in a nice car as a black male
 
Not at all saying race isn't a major factor, but do you guys think the cars themselves are attributable to the profiling statistic?


I'm sure a real ragged looking car earns more attention from cops than a nice, well kept one. Or perhaps a modified car (rims, stereo, exhaust, tints) stands out to a cop more than a bone stock one.


Consider the difference between a bright yellow sports car vs dark grey sedan in traffic, certain cars earn attention and may have certain stigmas assigned to them, fair or not.


Also not saying any type of cars belongs to any particular race, just saying its likely a variable significant enough to consider..
Where im from youll get stopped quicker if you are in a nice car as a black male
It really depends on the area. Where I'm from a black man in a luxury car isn't suspicious. Young or old. But if you young, black and in a '95 Buick lesabre or something you're seen as more suspicious. God forbid you got tints on it.
 
I knew this was true but the number exceeded what I expected

Round here the cops are more likely to pull you over for driving the typical hoodrich black guy car or seeing that your car is modified ridiculously 
 
Back
Top Bottom