Nike Air Jordan 1 "Chicago" - May 30, 2015. (LEGIT CHECK IN 1st POST)

How many pairs will you be copping?

  • "1" is all I need.

    Votes: 3 17.6%

  • 2. One to rock, One to stock.

    Votes: 8 47.1%

  • 3+. I need to hoard for no valid reason.

    Votes: 5 29.4%

  • 0. No OG Box? PASS.

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Total voters
    17
Show All
:lol: I thought UA was under armor... I remember in like 03 it was "varaints" then it was replica now its unauthorized, whats the next word?
 
Replicas (fakes) are completely different materials used in some factory. Unauthorized, many times, are the same nike materials being used, at the same factory Nike uses. Nike shuts down a production run, and shady Chinese factories have materials left over, and keep making shoes, and sell them on the grey market. There is a difference, but neither of which are authorized Nike releases.
 
So what if there are UA banned 1s and UA frags? I imagine the quality would be 'amazing' as you guys make it out to be.

Tempted? :lol:
 
They don't have HQ fake banneds they do have frags but most who are good with 1s can tell the difference

Fakes are getting better tho as you can see with the chicagos and even HQ SBB
 
Listen if ain't new it's used

If it ain't real it's fake


Almost?


You never had your car
 
Jordan Novice said:
So what if there are UA banned 1s and UA frags? I imagine the quality would be 'amazing' as you guys make it out to be.

Tempted? :lol:
Click to expand...

Certain UA's I've seen had really good quality and were comfortable.. Buuuuut it's just wack to rock UAs and try to make people think your wearing legit pairs.
 
Smh at wearing UAs

This dude takin bout they were comfortable
 
lewi1913 said:
Replicas (fakes) are completely different materials used in some factory. Unauthorized, many times, are the same nike materials being used, at the same factory Nike uses. Nike shuts down a production run, and shady Chinese factories have materials left over, and keep making shoes, and sell them on the grey market. There is a difference, but neither of which are authorized Nike releases.
Click to expand...

Yea but now the term issued too loosely. People slapping UA to justify their fake shoes they brought of some cheap Chinese website with the little photo of the call center lady in the corner for like 125$.

Scream I never do fakes I have a plug over seas that gets me back stock the extra aka UA's smh....

To me retailer or fake. Nike quality may not be the best but I'm not taking some hey we have the same materials pitch for 50-100 less.
 
SquatchNT said:
Zyzz said:
gil23 said:
Zyzz said:
They don't have HQ fake banneds they do have frags but most who are good with 1s can tell the difference

Fakes are getting better tho as you can see with the chicagos and even HQ SBB
Click to expand...

what you do with them UA bred ***?
Click to expand...

Threw me away

A few NTers tried to cop em off me :lol:
Click to expand...
Threw them away? LOL I don't belee that for a sec.
Click to expand...

I got my money back, what did you want me to do :lol: I wouldn't wear em even tho they looked like legit 2001s. I'll admit those fakes were damn good SRS
 
I love busting out the cats on IG with fugazis. Who remembers the cat that posted that pic of someone's surgically operated foot in the Yeezy 2 thread saying if you wear fakes your feet will end up like this. I still get lulz thinking about that
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Legit check Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG Next Chapter
Replies
7
Views
5K
anthos
anthos

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom