- 805
- 467
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2014
mine have 2/6/15 and 2/16/15
Nike Air Jordan 1 "Chicago" - May 30, 2015. (LEGIT CHECK IN 1st POST)
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by geraldg2309,
- Start date
- 1,404
- 414
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2015
Purchased from where?
- 267
- 237
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2013
This is my pair. Compared to others I have seen this is what the inside looks like, No swoosh stitching, just down the lace holes from this angle. Just for comparison sake. If you say fake or legit a pic of yours would be nice but a general poll would be nice
so we can compare apples to apples.
so we can compare apples to apples.
- 5,275
- 4,057
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2015
Last edited:
- 145
- 12
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2008
anyone notice the red and white laces being shorter than the black?
- 2,834
- 1,562
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2003
Lol I copped them. Dude shipped already. I had 2 11.5s. And couldn't trade for 11s so I just copped 11s
- 5,275
- 4,057
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2015
I compared my CHIs to my lasers which were both produced this year from 'remastered' molds/specs (I don't have LMs) ... The collar is stiffer but my experience with 1s (for the most part) is they break-in nicely. Also, I think the height profile is on par with high 1s ....
Last edited:
- 4,206
- 2,408
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2013
One pair: 12/10/14 - 2/6/15 (HOH) / Second pair: 11/26/14 - 1/30/15 (FA) Both 10.5
And no inside swoosh stitch on either..
- 816
- 696
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2005
They are definitely much higher than the Lance Mountains, and the ankle collar is a lot more stiff. I didn't realize the Lasers were butter till it was too late. Just felt up the size 12 that was sitting at a local spot the other day. Might even be softer than chicagos. Regret not getting a pair to repaint.
- 5,275
- 4,057
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2015
Yeah the lasers are definitely butta, and got me geeked up for the CHIs and SBBs. Some NTers have grabbed discounted lasers and thus I've been on the lookout for a pickup to do a custom - SBB or Frag colorway. The only downside for me about the lasers is the icy soles it's just not my thing and living in NYC a hard thing to maintain.
- 7,671
- 19,416
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2012
Laser 1's are def in my rotation due to their softness and comfort level. The LM's leather is legit but not as comfy as the Chi's or Laser's. I sit and wait for a good deal for a second pair of laser 1's, they're still a FSR on footlocker/eastbay. My only qualm against customizing the laser's is the icy sole, doesn't flow with whatever paint scheme to go with unless you dye the soles
- 2,916
- 788
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2013
Just to clear out that the pair has one shoe and one side with black stitching. the rest sides are normal (i guess they run out of materials
)
- 2,916
- 788
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2013
this is what i posted earlier..picked up pair on my own from store. the pair has 1 shoe with one of the 2 sides black stitching while the other side and the right shoe have the normal red stitching.
swooshsupreme
formerly sinista8
- 319
- 142
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2001
My size 11 has stitching on both side. Shoe was purchased from CRSVR Las Vegas.
- 702
- 152
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
Yeah you did. But no one else has mentioned black stitching on their legit pairs. That's why I want to hear if other people have the same thing.
- 702
- 152
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
Black or red stitching?
- 2,916
- 788
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2013
according to the "guide, there should not be any internal swoosh stitching.
Last edited:
swooshsupreme
formerly sinista8
- 319
- 142
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2001
Red
Last edited:
- 5,877
- 3,539
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2006
Looks like the inside stitching may be related to production date? Didn't even know you can get a pair with each shoe having different dates.
- 9,189
- 1,132
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
No, but it just shows to many people your ineptitude when it comes to comparisons with certain sneakers. You have the right to comment on whatever it is, just find it ironic how you are clowning on someone else for comparing leather to leather, albeit much different circumstances, when you yourself just said you don't observe shoes that closely...
- 37,348
- 31,605
- Joined
- May 1, 2011
No, but it just shows to many people your ineptitude when it comes to comparisons with certain sneakers. You have the right to comment on whatever it is, just find it ironic how you are clowning on someone else for comparing leather to leather, albeit much different circumstances, when you yourself just said you don't observe shoes that closely...
comparing leather on a shoes to a car!
I think leather is a lot easier to compare than some mold, especially an OG mold.
Agree to disagree. Sorry I can't remember a mold from '92 and laughing because someone compared leather on a shoe to leather in a car.
View media item 1594849
- 9,189
- 1,132
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
Leather is leather son. OBVIOUSLY, as I stated it is different circumstances, comparing a car's leather to a shoe's leather, but the guys point was that dudes were getting all geeked over the leather quality of these recent 1's as if it was the best leather in the world or something
and it's not about "remembering" anything about a mold from 92'. It's the internet bruh. There's pictures everywhere, including in the Bordeaux VII thread..how obvious does it have to be?
Last edited:
- 37,348
- 31,605
- Joined
- May 1, 2011
Leather is leather son. OBVIOUSLY, as I stated it is different circumstances, comparing a car's leather to a shoe's leather, but the guys point was that dudes were getting all geeked over the leather quality of these recent 1's as if it was the best leather in the world or something
and it's not about "remembering" anything about a mold from 92'. It's the internet bruh. There's pictures everywhere, including in the Bordeaux VII thread..how obvious does it have to be?
You win SON.
Edit: forgot this too
Last edited:
- 9,189
- 1,132
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
You win SON.
Edit: forgot this too
You edited your own post to take a shot at me?
You clownin'..
- 37,348
- 31,605
- Joined
- May 1, 2011
You edited your own post to take a shot at me?
You clownin'..
Yes, forgot to happy face.
