EddieDoyers
formerly eddiengambino
- Apr 3, 2012
- 46,208
- 23,878
Juwan Howard doe
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Melo has a lot of wear and tear on his body and Isola is right...by the time the Knicks pick from next year POSSIBLY matures, Melo will probably be 34 or so...and there's a good chance that if he's not moved by then, there will be a LARGE contingent of fans who won't be happy with him on the roster.
You're looking at things with a glass half full perspective. Sure, Phil needs a bit of time, but I haven't seen anything thus far that really leads me to believe that this team can head in the right direction. I saw it for a minute with Donnie Walsh and I believed in his vision, but I think there is good reason for skepticism involved w/ the Knicks.
You really think that this is a well-run organization and it's not a mess structurally? Phil Jackson is a band aid on a gash that requires staples. You can make a case for James Dolan being one of the worst owners in the league and their dysfunction starts with him.
It's going to be a wait and see with the Knicks to find out what Jackson is going to do, but like I said in the paragraph above...the skepticism is warranted.
That "overrated stat padder" jig is overblown. I'm not saying that those numbers aren't necessarily correlating to a winning brand of basketball, but rebounding is something that is more of a directive of effort and technique, which I think translates well no matter where you are. He's not a 26 ppg scorer on a Championship team nor is he a #1, but overrated is harsh in my opinion and only an indication of vilification for those who never thought too highly of him in the first place.He's been only an overrated stat padder for years and a mediocre defender
Varejao was masking his defensive deficiencies, but since he's out, Cavs defense been leakier than a run down faucet
Not because they necessarily need him going forward, but I would love to see him back in Minnesota. It would be funny to stick it to a team like that after already ridding them of their last two first-rounders, but because I think he could accelerate Minnesota being competitive again and I don't think he would take away from the young cores development.Love going to the Spurs in July.
Way way too soon. I would still allow time, because Love can still be a very valuable asset. I agree with a lot of the other stuff you said though.I Truly believe that K.Love should be traded, not because your going to get a Better all around PF back, but because the skillset that he's limited too on this team can be had for much cheaper & the team has many other glaring weaknesses.
Melo has a lot of wear and tear on his body and Isola is right...by the time the Knicks pick from next year POSSIBLY matures, Melo will probably be 34 or so...and there's a good chance that if he's not moved by then, there will be a LARGE contingent of fans who won't be happy with him on the roster.
You're looking at things with a glass half full perspective. Sure, Phil needs a bit of time, but I haven't seen anything thus far that really leads me to believe that this team can head in the right direction. I saw it for a minute with Donnie Walsh and I believed in his vision, but I think there is good reason for skepticism involved w/ the Knicks.
You really think that this is a well-run organization and it's not a mess structurally? Phil Jackson is a band aid on a gash that requires staples. You can make a case for James Dolan being one of the worst owners in the league and their dysfunction starts with him.
It's going to be a wait and see with the Knicks to find out what Jackson is going to do, but like I said in the paragraph above...the skepticism is warranted.
Is having a top 3 pick, tons of cap & an AS caliber player not the right direction? I'm really thinking of what other scenario a rebuilding team could possibly want. Dolan is one of the worst owners in sports that i will never disagree with. However him giving Phil that much money & that much control gives me hope that he's finally letting the GM do his job.
If it's one thing we can't overlook is Phil knowing what it takes to build a winning team & finding correct pieces to make a team work. Nothing about Phil Jackson makes me think he's going to build a dysfunctional team, or try and fit pieces together that clearly don't work. He's been the opposite of that his entire career. If it's one thing Phil has always been able to do it's find role players who work perfect with his major pieces.
If the knicks even turn into a consistent playoff team, he's already the best Gm theyve had in the past 15 years. I'm in no way saying i expect him to build a championship team because their are SO MANY variables to doing that. But i have full faith that he will sign players who fit Melo's game & won't give out the horrendous contracts the Knicks are known for giving out.
Phil's had success as a coach. Not executive. Let's not get ahead of ourselves that just because he was a great coach means he'll be a great executive.
just going off the idea that there's always some dumb/desperate gm that overpays someone every year.shump's gonna get overpaid
By who tho... his game simply hasn't improved at all. I think he's gonna be a nice steal for someone actually, unless he drastically improves upon return i just don't see him really being that coveted.
Hell if i was the knicks i would trade him & shump for Lance & filler or a pick. Basically your trading headcase for headcase, but atleast Lance does more on the court than JR.
Only problem is lance back in NYC , but once again the Knicks have JR in NYC can it really get that much worse?
Yep.Phil's had success as a coach. Not executive. Let's not get ahead of ourselves that just because he was a great coach means he'll be a great executive.
He has the tools (retained our only superstar in Melo, top 5 pick, and cap space for AS caliber players) in front of him to succeed.
If summer 2015 is a bust, then I think we can say Phil failed.
Phil's had success as a coach. Not executive. Let's not get ahead of ourselves that just because he was a great coach means he'll be a great executive.
Yep.
At least he hasn't destroyed any long-term flexibility besides the Chandler-Calderon trade.
Safe to say, that this might be the biggest challenge of Phil's professional career. I really think the Knicks would have been better off blowing the whole thing up. That Melo contract, IMO, will be looked at as one of the worst in the league in a season or two. As I mentioned before, I think Donnie Walsh had a good idea of what to do with the Knicks, but we all see how that turned out.
Woj reporting Smith is expected to play, he participated in the morning shootaroundSmith playing tonight?
Safe to say, that this might be the biggest challenge of Phil's professional career. I really think the Knicks would have been better off blowing the whole thing up. That Melo contract, IMO, will be looked at as one of the worst in the league in a season or two. As I mentioned before, I think Donnie Walsh had a good idea of what to do with the Knicks, but we all see how that turned out.
Safe to say, that this might be the biggest challenge of Phil's professional career. I really think the Knicks would have been better off blowing the whole thing up. That Melo contract, IMO, will be looked at as one of the worst in the league in a season or two. As I mentioned before, I think Donnie Walsh had a good idea of what to do with the Knicks, but we all see how that turned out.
Safe to say, that this might be the biggest challenge of Phil's professional career. I really think the Knicks would have been better off blowing the whole thing up. That Melo contract, IMO, will be looked at as one of the worst in the league in a season or two. As I mentioned before, I think Donnie Walsh had a good idea of what to do with the Knicks, but we all see how that turned out.
I'm interested in how you could think Melo's contract could be one of the worst in the League (Excluding a major injury). There is nothing about Melo's game that reads that he'll slow down significantly with age, he's never been one to rely on straight athleticism, he can shoot the ball really well, he has a post game, he's strong for his size, & he already showed he can effectively play the 4.
Donnie did it the way you suggested, blew the whole team up had no players left and open cap.... However he had nobody to lure another star to NY with. so he ended up with Amare Stoudemire only. His knees turnt to dust and the knicks have been ****** ever since.
In Phil's Scenario it's the same set up.. only difference is he now has a selling point Teamin up with a current AS & having a potential AS growing as melo begins to gradually decline in the next 3-4 years. If your a great talent on the Market right now you can sign to NY for Max money knowing you don't have to carry the load by yourself and still have room left for some good role players to join on.
we could still dump caldron's contract. i gotta believe some playoff team wouldnt be against taking him on. I'm totally in favor of dumping him and jr to open up 14 mill or so this summer as opposed to the offseason after.Yep.Phil's had success as a coach. Not executive. Let's not get ahead of ourselves that just because he was a great coach means he'll be a great executive.
He has the tools (retained our only superstar in Melo, top 5 pick, and cap space for AS caliber players) in front of him to succeed.
If summer 2015 is a bust, then I think we can say Phil failed.
At least he hasn't destroyed any long-term flexibility besides the Chandler-Calderon trade.