Some quick points about Black homocide and "black on black" crime vol: stop trollin, famb.

Status
Not open for further replies.

fontaine

Banned
8,053
6,535
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
We all know that black-on-black crime is myth perpetuated by the far right to justify treating black people like crap.

And we are fully aware that there is no such thing b/c the rates are nearly identical in regards to one race killing its own. you kill those who are closest to you.


but now... these guys have some new jargon they're trying to kick...

Trying to say "no... black people just kill themselves at a higher clip. you're 5x more likely to get killed as a black person than you are as a white person" or "its an epidemic in the black community that they're killing themselves. they kill themselves more than every other group"

this is completely false.

please do not let these people try and throw you this nonsense, and have you thinking that black people are inherently more violent


The main determinant about murders is POVERTY... Poor people tend to kill more...

The only problem is that poor black people make up a larger % of its population than poor white people.




here are a couple posts i made in another thread BREAKING this nonsense down.

pretending this there isnt a higher rate of poor black people compared to poor white people...

and poor/poverty is the MAIN factor in killing...

its like... "come on, famb"... :lol:

but kittyblood over there ignoring the facts... or he knows and just wants to rustle jimmies.

http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/badcomm.htm

Violent crime rates have more to do with poverty levels in a neighborhood than with the race of local residents, new research has found.

A study of Columbus neighborhoods found that violent crime rates in extremely disadvantaged white neighborhoods were very similar to rates in comparable Black neighborhoods.

The violent crime rate in highly disadvantaged Black areas was 22 per 1,000 residents, not much different from the 20 per 1,000 rate in similar white communities.





a study from villanova

http://www88.homepage.villanova.edu/lance.hannon/Forthcoming in the Journal of Poverty.pdf


In contrast, the few neighborhood-level studies on this topic have been relatively
consistent in their findings regarding racial invariance in the cross-sectional relationship
between disadvantage and violent crime. These studies usually conclude that the effect
of economic deprivation is similar for blacks and whites. In their seminal cross-sectional
study of census tracts in Columbus, Ohio, Krivo and Peterson (1996) compared the effect
of socioeconomic disadvantage on violent crime for areas that were predominately white
(70%+) and predominately black (70%+). Employing a dummy-variable interaction
effect analysis, Krivo and Peterson (1996, p. 633) concluded that their results supported
the argument that “structural conditions of disadvantage affect black and white
communities in the same manner.”


another study from villanova


http://www88.homepage.villanova.edu...the Relationship between Poverty_Homicide.pdf






but it's a black problem, right?






and here is the breakdown of the numbers w/ some quick math i found through wikipedia and a credible crime statistic website




i meant from a percentage standpoint, there are more black people in regards to percentage of population.

The violent crime rate in highly disadvantaged Black areas was 22 per 1,000 residents, not much different from the 20 per 1,000 rate in similar white communities.

meaning that all things being equal from a socioeconomic standpoint... the murder rate is the same.


(from wikipedia)

total black population: 45M
poor % of blacks: 27.1
poor # of blacks: 12.4M

total white population: 223M
poor % of whites: 9
poor # of whites: 20m

(from uniform crime rates 2012) click here for article

# of black murders by black people: 2,412
# of white murders by white people: 2,614

so when you compare it to TOTAL population... yes, it may SEEM like its a MUCH higher rate...

black: 2.4K / 45M = .0053%
white: 2.6k / 223M = .0012%

which means from a TOTAL perspective... you're 4.5x as likely to be murdered if you're a black person.

but when you look at the POOR population..

black: 2.4k / 12.4M = .019%
white 2.6 / 20M = .013

which means from a POOR perspective... you're 1.4x as likely to be murdered if you're a black person...



THAT'S HOW STATS GET SKEWED... take into consideration that blacks get convicted at a substantially higher rate than whites, and that will bring the rate down even more.

this was quick and dirty math that comes REALLY close to the 20 out of 100k and 22 out of 100k that was in the article i quoted (22/20 = 1.1)
 
Get outta here with all that common sense bruh. Ain't nobody got time for that. Black people are uncaged animals and all of our neighborhoods are violent, crime infested ghettos even if the median income is way above the national avg.
 
Anton trolls...

your jimmies are rustled...

you create thread...

Anton laughs in the shadows...

Anton wins.




...
not just Anton.

I've seen some others try to bring these talking points up, whether it be Facebook or comments sections or other NTers.

Just trying to spresd the knowledge...

Also... Jimmies are indeed intact.
 
Last edited:
Srs questions with all the propganda and slander thrown blacks way how they hell did big d stay mainstream as well . Was that a scare tactic too as part of how we blacks would do the perfect white women. I can see that point but wtf
 
Srs questions with all the propganda and slander thrown blacks way how they hell did big d stay mainstream as well . Was that a scare tactic too as part of how we blacks would do the perfect white women. I can see that point but wtf


View media item 1218180



:lol:

Damn.

:smh:

Bruh...

Brother fontaine fontaine is trying to pass on some knowledge and you're asking about the legend of the black meat?
























1399345730231.gif



I want to understand what you're trying to say because I'm dying over here and I must be misinterpreting that. Clear it up my dude. Please.
 
What i was trying to ask badly half asleep was in a propganda stand point why sex shaming the threat the go to bullet point after discrediting their psyche.

Case in point immigrants wi take you jobs AND have a bunch of kids
 
What i was trying to ask badly half asleep was in a propganda stand point why sex shaming the threat the go to bullet point after discrediting their psyche.

Case in point immigrants wi take you jobs AND have a bunch of kids


I was about to write my own opinion and historical analysis on this subject, but found a great blog post about it. Hopefully this gets you started in the direction of answers that you were looking for.


The Black Brute is probably the best known stereotype of Black men and it still exists today. There have been incidents where some white women have used the Black Brute stereotype to their advantage by blaming unnamed Black men for crimes such as rape or murder...


We all know the history of lynching and how white women have been put on a pedestal of purity, while Black women have been portrayed and treated as inherently dirty, inferior and impure. It wasn’t uncommon for a Black man to be lynched for looking at a white woman, while Black women were regularly gang-raped and abused by white men throughout slavery, the reconstruction and Jim Crow...


I was browsing around on the Experience Project and I clicked into a section about Black men and lo and behold, there are tons and tons of stories about Black men sleeping with married white women while their husband’s watch. The majority of the stories that I saw were written by white men. Now, this is not the first time that I’ve heard about the “Black stud ****old,” fantasy. I read Eldridge Cleaver’s Soul on Ice and in the book he talks about this phenomenon himself...

“There are white men who will pay you to **** their wives. They approach you and say, ‘How would you like to **** a white woman? ‘What is this? you ask. ‘On the up-and-up,’ he assures you. ‘It’s all right she’s my wife. She needs black rod, is all. She has to have it. It’s like a medicine or drug to her.” – Eldridge Cleaver


http://blacknotwhitedippedinchocola...an-tired-of-the-mandingo-stereotype-part-one/

http://blacknotwhitedippedinchocola...-woman-tired-of-mandingo-stereotype-part-two/


Malcolm X also talked about "strange" sex parties/arrangements in his Autobiography.

Personally speaking it's crazy. I never stop to think too much about it, but we ARE treated like sexual objects to a large degree. The **** I hear whispered just loud enough or said just conveniently so I overhear it sometimes is shocking and it's rarely from black women. I'm not going to repeat any of it, but I've even had female coworkers tell me what another female coworker said before and I've been blown away. There are definitely levels to racism and stereotypes.
 
Last edited:
The perpetuation of Black stereotypes is nothing knew, it keeps White people in fear, and then voting a certain way.

Speak about being tough on crime, and they know who you are talking about clamping down upon. More prisons to protect the good down home folk.

They kill each other, they don't care about killing us.
 
Care to share some of what these coworkers have said. But yeah the stereotype of black dudes with big Ds from a white point of view is puzzling after all these years. Still wonder what a white woman thinks when said deed is about to take place.
 
It's really not worth repeating. Just stereotypical Mandingo fantasy stuff and assuming based on my height and size.

Wait, Anton go by a different name now? I'm confused.

Yep. He's had a few different sn's. He's LIONBLOOD now.
 
Last edited:
I'm still lost about what Anton and you were arguing about.

If you change this
Trying to say "no... black people just kill themselves at a higher clip. you're 5x more likely to get killed as a black person than you are as a white person" or "its an epidemic in the black community that they're killing themselves. they kill themselves more than every other group"
to this
Trying to say "no... black poor people just kill themselves at a higher clip. you're 5x more likely to get killed as a poor person than you are as a middle class or upper class rich person" or "its an epidemic in the poor community that they're killing themselves. they kill themselves more than every other group"
and simply add that because black ppl don't make up a large part of the population and that many of them are categorized as poor that that is why it's an "epidemic" in the black community? I mean if you have a group and more of them are closer to lower middle class to poor and we all know poor ppl kill each other more wouldn't be common sense to say killing each other is a problem amongst poor black ppl? I think it simply comes down to asking who these poor ppl are.

Wasn't he talking about poor black ppl for the most part or at least made sure to bring up how being poor plays a factor? or was he really just saying all black ppl kill each other more than any group and that's the end of the argument?
Srs questions with all the propganda and slander thrown blacks way how they hell did big d stay mainstream as well . Was that a scare tactic too as part of how we blacks would do the perfect white women. I can see that point but wtf
We've talked on this before in some other thread way more thoroughly.

Back in the big meat was seen as barbaric and savage. None of these white women ever experienced a big one so they didn't know what they were missing. It was just seen as more reason to compare black ppl to animals as we stood up on the auction block naked about to be sold. Small dainty penises were the in the thing. You gotta keep in mind these white dudes were rocking wigs, lipstick and other makeup products more than the women. That whole upper class aristocrat style was to basically be as effeminate as possible. The more ***** made you looked the more rich you apparently were.

So as a consequence for a very long time big meat was looked down upon until I assume one day one of these low class freaky white women tried the black meat and never went back. Told her friends and then all these other poor white dudes started losing their women to the black man. Then the not so Uncle Tom house slaves started banging mass's white daughter and blaming it on the field slaves. That's how the stereotype remains today and that's also why some white fathers don't want their daughters dating no black dude. Intimidated by the massive black penis. So it becomes more of an inadequacy thing first and racist thing second (don't mind that those same white fathers will also have jungle fever and rape slaves themselves and/or carry on actual relationships/affairs).
 
Last edited:
This dude is hilarious IDK why you guys still bother with dude, he's literally spent years out of his life crafting a troll persona for a message board if anything feel sorry for him.
 
I'm still lost about what Anton and you were arguing about.

If you change this
to this
and simply add that because black ppl don't make up a large part of the population and that many of them are categorized as poor that that is why it's an "epidemic" in the black community? I mean if you have a group and more of them are closer to lower middle class to poor and we all know poor ppl kill each other more wouldn't be common sense to say killing each other is a problem amongst poor black ppl? I think it simply comes down to asking who these poor ppl are.

Wasn't he talking about poor black ppl for the most part or at least made sure to bring up how being poor plays a factor? or was he really just saying all black ppl kill each other more than any group and that's the end of the argument?
We've talked on this before in some other thread way more thoroughly.

Back in the big meat was seen as barbaric and savage. None of these white women ever experienced a big one so they didn't know what they were missing. It was just seen as more reason to compare black ppl to animals as we stood up on the auction block naked about to be sold. Small dainty penises were the in the thing. You gotta keep in mind these white dudes were rocking wigs, lipstick and other makeup products more than the women. That whole upper class aristocrat style was to basically be as effeminate as possible. The more ***** made you looked the more rich you apparently were.

So as a consequence for a very long time big meat was looked down upon until I assume one day one of these low class freaky white women tried the black meat and never went back. Told her friends and then all these other poor white dudes started losing their women to the white man. Then the not so Uncle Tom house slaves started banging mass's white daughter and blaming it on the field slaves. That's how the stereotype remains today and that's also why some white fathers don't want their daughters dating no black dude. Intimidated by the massive black penis. So it becomes more of an inadequacy thing first and racist thing second (don't mind that those same white fathers will also have jungle fever and rape slaves themselves and/or carry on actual relationships/affairs).


Yeah man i feel like that what going on now in the industry with the feminine male look my young black men are rocking all the while a bearded white man is the hero . Blacks nowadays csnt see through propaganda
 
 
http://www.blackyouthproject.com/20...the-leading-cause-of-death-among-black-teens/

Which racist white man made this website? I mean all these stats look like simple math to me, blacks make up 10-12% of the population but carry a significant number of these violent crimes most of which are committed by their fellow brethren.

Population control
nthat.gif
It's all part of the plan.

This is where someone says, poverty is more of a factor.

Then I respond thank you captain obvious, the socioeconomic status in the black community is the only factor.

Pointless bickering ensues, people get their pantaloons rumpled, I savor it cause I'm a sadist.
ohwell.gif
 
The issue with stats like this lies where was comparison done, then how they compiled those statistics. It's based upon bad science. Inductive methods were not used, such as compiling data GLOBALLY, in order to truly determine a trend.

That is what responsible researchers do with illnesses, so why not do the same with social ills?
 
Last edited:
The issue with stats like this where was comparison done, and how they compiled the statistics. It's based upon bad science. Inductive methods were not used, such as compiling data GLOBALLY, in order to truly determine a trend.

That is what responsible researchers do with illnesses, so why not do the same with social ills?

dont waste your time homie.
 
I'm still lost about what Anton and you were arguing about.

If you change this
Trying to say "no... black people just kill themselves at a higher clip. you're 5x more likely to get killed as a black person than you are as a white person" or "its an epidemic in the black community that they're killing themselves. they kill themselves more than every other group"
to this
Trying to say "no... black poor people just kill themselves at a higher clip. you're 5x more likely to get killed as a poor person than you are as a middle class or upper class rich person" or "its an epidemic in the poor community that they're killing themselves. they kill themselves more than every other group"
and simply add that because black ppl don't make up a large part of the population and that many of them are categorized as poor that that is why it's an "epidemic" in the black community? I mean if you have a group and more of them are closer to lower middle class to poor and we all know poor ppl kill each other more wouldn't be common sense to say killing each other is a problem amongst poor black ppl? I think it simply comes down to asking who these poor ppl are.

Wasn't he talking about poor black ppl for the most part or at least made sure to bring up how being poor plays a factor? or was he really just saying all black ppl kill each other more than any group and that's the end of the argument?
Srs questions with all the propganda and slander thrown blacks way how they hell did big d stay mainstream as well . Was that a scare tactic too as part of how we blacks would do the perfect white women. I can see that point but wtf
We've talked on this before in some other thread way more thoroughly.

Back in the big meat was seen as barbaric and savage. None of these white women ever experienced a big one so they didn't know what they were missing. It was just seen as more reason to compare black ppl to animals as we stood up on the auction block naked about to be sold. Small dainty penises were the in the thing. You gotta keep in mind these white dudes were rocking wigs, lipstick and other makeup products more than the women. That whole upper class aristocrat style was to basically be as effeminate as possible. The more ***** made you looked the more rich you apparently were.

So as a consequence for a very long time big meat was looked down upon until I assume one day one of these low class freaky white women tried the black meat and never went back. Told her friends and then all these other poor white dudes started losing their women to the black man. Then the not so Uncle Tom house slaves started banging mass's white daughter and blaming it on the field slaves. That's how the stereotype remains today and that's also why some white fathers don't want their daughters dating no black dude. Intimidated by the massive black penis. So it becomes more of an inadequacy thing first and racist thing second (don't mind that those same white fathers will also have jungle fever and rape slaves themselves and/or carry on actual relationships/affairs).

To even give him this benefit of doubt is to ignore his previous posts. Didn't read, but let me guess, says something outrageous to intentionally mislead you, then tweak it and add articles as the outrage comes in making it look like his original statement doesn't exist or you took it out of context? I wouldn't even waste time, this isn't anything we haven't seen before.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom