- 192
- 149
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2013
this...Someone saying "Hi" or asking how your day is going is verbal street harassment?
Gassing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
this...Someone saying "Hi" or asking how your day is going is verbal street harassment?
Gassing.
“We got a fair amount of white guys, but for whatever reason, a lot of what they said was in passing, or off camera”
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_facto...k_at_street_harassment_in_nyc_edited_out.html
LOL K. YOU RECORDED FOR 10 HOURS.
If a ***** was gonna catch a rape charge, he wouldn't waste it on you.
well, finally you NT-'the man is against us'-agenda-people are right, turns out the director is a racist who supports gentrification and purposefully edited out the white men in the video
https://storify.com/Aut_Omnia/why-you-shouldnt-share-the-nyc
http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2010/06/rob_bliss_grand_rapids_can_att.html
“We got a fair amount of white guys, but for whatever reason, a lot of what they said was in passing, or off camera”
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_facto...k_at_street_harassment_in_nyc_edited_out.html
LOL K. YOU RECORDED FOR 10 HOURS.
this is disgusting they knew what the hell they were doing
And its always the ugly white girls on campus who go to the other side of the street when they see ******/or think every black dude wants them.
The pretty ones like dark meat or at the very least are polite and always greeting you with a smile.
In fact, it's always ugly girls in general who go extra hard with that feminist ****. If a ***** was gonna catch a rape charge, he wouldn't waste it on you.
“is not a perfect representation of everything that happened.”
What you mean finally. This **** happens more than you think.well, finally you NT-'the man is against us'-agenda-people are right, turns out the director is a racist who supports gentrification and purposefully edited out the white men in the video
https://storify.com/Aut_Omnia/why-you-shouldnt-share-the-nyc
http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2010/06/rob_bliss_grand_rapids_can_att.html
*waits for feminists to say she was in an abusive relationship*Dude had to spin his chick around
[COLOR=#red]New York Times: Should Black And Hispanic Men Be Banned From Chatting Up White Feminist Women?
[/COLOR]
By now, you’ve probably seen the viral video in which the frumpy woman with the “Flashdance” hair walks around the streets of New York City getting catcalled.
The hidden-camera video was released last week by Hollaback, a group that bills itself as “an international movement to end street harassment.” The video documents the woman, 24-year-old actress Shoshana Roberts walking the streets of New York for 10 hours as she claims to be the victim of some 100 instances of harassment.
Now, The New York Times wants to know if a law should shield white feminist women by preventing black and Hispanic men from speaking to them, and possibly offending their tender sensibilities.
“Do We Need a Law Against Catcalling?” the august, Victorian newspaper asks.
“Should current laws dealing with harassment be strengthened to include catcalling, or will that go too far in trying to control speech and behavior?”
In the video, virtually every man who speaks to Roberts (with comments such as “How you doing today?”) is either black or Hispanic.
While some commenters who responded to the “Room for Debate” piece noted the potential constitutional problems with a law against minority men chatting up white women, others wholeheartedly agreed that men on public streets must be silenced.
“I agree that there should be a law against street harassment,” wrote a commenter named Andrea from Boston. “I am sick of people telling me that a man’s First Amendment right is more important than my right to feel safe in public places.”
Reader SZ agreed.
“There should be a law. It is scary and infuriating. Who are they to ruin my day? Who are they to attempt to diminish me? I have no recourse,” SZ complained, apparently seriously. “Anything I say or do inspires more unwanted attention. The bullies have made the law necessary.”
Another reader, Elliot Podwill of New York City proved that he has no understanding of current law in his support for a new law chilling free speech.
“Would readers who feel the government shouldn’t interfere in what they regard as basically harmless behavior feel the same if the comments were racist, homophobic, or anti-Semitic?” asked Podwill. “I agree that laws would be hard to enforce, but that’s true of many laws we mostly agree should at least be on the books.”
http://news.yahoo.com/york-times-black-hispanic-men-banned-chatting-white-035140800.html
I think that article was satirical in its nature...
I think that article was satirical in its nature...
“There should be a law. It is scary and infuriating. Who are they to ruin my day? Who are they to attempt to diminish me? I have no recourse,” SZ complained, apparently seriously. “Anything I say or do inspires more unwanted attention. The bullies have made the law necessary.”
Don't be naive. Look at her appearance.Lmao, they know that. They're just thirsty to point the finger "see see they are racists!"
The NY Times doesn't say that.