Thirsty NY Street Cats vol. Is it cause I'm ugly?!

 
Someone saying "Hi" or asking how your day is going is verbal street harassment?

laugh.gif


Gassing.​
this...
 
“We got a fair amount of white guys, but for whatever reason, a lot of what they said was in passing, or off camera”

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_facto...k_at_street_harassment_in_nyc_edited_out.html


LOL K. YOU RECORDED FOR 10 HOURS.

this is disgusting they knew what the hell they were doing

And its always the ugly white girls on campus who go to the other side of the street when they see ******/or think every black dude wants them.

The pretty ones like dark meat or at the very least are polite and always greeting you with a smile.

In fact, it's always ugly girls in general who go extra hard with that feminist ****. If a ***** was gonna catch a rape charge, he wouldn't waste it on you.​
 
well, finally you NT-'the man is against us'-agenda-people are right, turns out the director is a racist who supports gentrification and purposefully edited out the white men in the video



https://storify.com/Aut_Omnia/why-you-shouldnt-share-the-nyc


http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2010/06/rob_bliss_grand_rapids_can_att.html

“We got a fair amount of white guys, but for whatever reason, a lot of what they said was in passing, or off camera,” or was ruined by a siren or other noise. The final product, he writes, “is not a perfect representation of everything that happened.”

Clown *** video and women. :smh:
 
Last edited:
“We got a fair amount of white guys, but for whatever reason, a lot of what they said was in passing, or off camera”

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_facto...k_at_street_harassment_in_nyc_edited_out.html


LOL K. YOU RECORDED FOR 10 HOURS.

this is disgusting they knew what the hell they were doing

And its always the ugly white girls on campus who go to the other side of the street when they see ******/or think every black dude wants them.

The pretty ones like dark meat or at the very least are polite and always greeting you with a smile.

In fact, it's always ugly girls in general who go extra hard with that feminist ****. If a ***** was gonna catch a rape charge, he wouldn't waste it on you.​


Alonzo-Mourning.gif


:lol:
 
“is not a perfect representation of everything that happened.”

EXACTLY my point. Video is worthless. How can anyone defend it or even take it seriously? I'm calling her out, she's a racist.


Anyone that gave this the thumbs up on TV or whatever needs to issue a public apology and get a slap to the face
 
Last edited:
well, finally you NT-'the man is against us'-agenda-people are right, turns out the director is a racist who supports gentrification and purposefully edited out the white men in the video



https://storify.com/Aut_Omnia/why-you-shouldnt-share-the-nyc


http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2010/06/rob_bliss_grand_rapids_can_att.html
What you mean finally. This **** happens more than you think.

I know NTers may be a bit overbearing with it on here cuz not every topic has to be narrowed down to that but **** like this is prevalent
 
Ahhh...this train is never late; slowly but surely, it always comes around...



[COLOR=#red]New York Times: Should Black And Hispanic Men Be Banned From Chatting Up White Feminist Women?
[/COLOR]


By now, you’ve probably seen the viral video in which the frumpy woman with the “Flashdance” hair walks around the streets of New York City getting catcalled.

The hidden-camera video was released last week by Hollaback, a group that bills itself as “an international movement to end street harassment.” The video documents the woman, 24-year-old actress Shoshana Roberts walking the streets of New York for 10 hours as she claims to be the victim of some 100 instances of harassment.

Now, The New York Times wants to know if a law should shield white feminist women by preventing black and Hispanic men from speaking to them, and possibly offending their tender sensibilities.

“Do We Need a Law Against Catcalling?” the august, Victorian newspaper asks.

“Should current laws dealing with harassment be strengthened to include catcalling, or will that go too far in trying to control speech and behavior?”

In the video, virtually every man who speaks to Roberts (with comments such as “How you doing today?”) is either black or Hispanic.

While some commenters who responded to the “Room for Debate” piece noted the potential constitutional problems with a law against minority men chatting up white women, others wholeheartedly agreed that men on public streets must be silenced.

“I agree that there should be a law against street harassment,” wrote a commenter named Andrea from Boston. “I am sick of people telling me that a man’s First Amendment right is more important than my right to feel safe in public places.”

Reader SZ agreed.

“There should be a law. It is scary and infuriating. Who are they to ruin my day? Who are they to attempt to diminish me? I have no recourse,” SZ complained, apparently seriously. “Anything I say or do inspires more unwanted attention. The bullies have made the law necessary.”

Another reader, Elliot Podwill of New York City proved that he has no understanding of current law in his support for a new law chilling free speech.

“Would readers who feel the government shouldn’t interfere in what they regard as basically harmless behavior feel the same if the comments were racist, homophobic, or anti-Semitic?” asked Podwill. “I agree that laws would be hard to enforce, but that’s true of many laws we mostly agree should at least be on the books.”



http://news.yahoo.com/york-times-black-hispanic-men-banned-chatting-white-035140800.html




:smh:





...
 
What kind of blatantly racist question is that :x :smh:

That's not even being feminist, that's 100% racist.

Feminists stay losing constantly
 
I think that article was satirical in its nature...



I don't think it was meant to be satire, but even if that was the case, how many folks will see it as so?

“There should be a law. It is scary and infuriating. Who are they to ruin my day? Who are they to attempt to diminish me? I have no recourse,” SZ complained, apparently seriously. “Anything I say or do inspires more unwanted attention. The bullies have made the law necessary.”


Of course, one could argue that this proposed law targets all harassers, but given the misleading nature of the video, it's not a stretch to surmise that this law will target black and brown men exclusively.

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebat...ment-law-would-restrict-intimidating-behavior




...
 
Last edited:
Lmao, they know that. They're just thirsty to point the finger "see see they are racists!"

The NY Times doesn't say that.
Don't be naive. Look at her appearance.

She has that latina/mixed look where her skin is tanned,hair curled with thick thighs/***.If no one had mentioned her being jewish, i would've assume that she was a Latina coming home from work at the salon.

They would've gotten different results if it was some Kirsten Dunst looking broad but nahhhhhhhhhhh, let's choose the most non looking white chick there is. 

Trotted this broad out there to attract a certain type...and STILL had the nerve to edit people out. 

They're callin' this "hollaback"...took the most black-stereotypical cat-call that they could imagine. They couldn't have been any more transparent unless they called it "wut it do shawty" or some ****.... 

And "Street Harassment" as a name? Considering the amount of police harassment, in both the city of NY, as well as America at large. But it's only important when it's happening to white women....

Street harassment is an issue that all races of men are guilty of...and all races of women fall victim to. But then again, that would actually support a fair and balanced discussion towards the issue at hand.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom