BORDEAUX 7S JULY 18th 2015

wouldn't call tucking in your whole pant leg into your shoe relaxed
laugh.gif
 
I think @NobleKane
  will vouch that the majority of pics posted before release showed us pretty much what was released.

It was nice to see a number of people post pics of decent pairs but the expectation was a jacked up toebox.

The lump/dip on top of the toe box is something I could deal with. Installing Sneaker Shields would probably solve that issue anyway. What I can't deal with is flat spots on the front of the toe boxes where they should be rounded. My Hare VII's had the same issue, and the Bordeaux VII's looked even worse.

Wish this wasn't true, but 2011's put the 2015's to shame.

 
Last edited:
I'm not gonna settle down. The amount of enablers I see in here is embarrassing, and it pisses me off.
If it pisses you off , why keep coming back ? We understand that you hate the quality of this shoe ! If I hated a shoe that much I wouldn't continue to go into the thread . Some people buy shoes for diffrent reasons and could care less about quality . You coming in hear preaching on every page ain't gonna change who's ever happy with these . It's been like this forever... You gonna give yourself high blood pressure over JB quality issues . Lol
 
I'm not gonna settle down. The amount of enablers I see in here is embarrassing, and it pisses me off.
If it pisses you off , why keep coming back ? We understand that you hate the quality of this shoe ! If I hated a shoe that much I wouldn't continue to go into the thread . Some people buy shoes for diffrent reasons and could care less about quality . You coming in hear preaching on every page ain't gonna change who's ever happy with these . It's been like this forever... You gonna give yourself high blood pressure over JB quality issues . Lol

Agreed. It's like he just woke up and realized things were furred up and now needs to opens everyone's eyes to what's good.

The argument is moot at this point and ultimately we have to make our own decisions.

He's definitely right that IF a class action suit happened, we, the consumers should be seeing a kick back because the remastered stuff is definitely false advertising BUT trying to force his opinion on everyone is rubbing people wrong.

I'd rather just return a poorly put together shoe vs keep them but another person may say hey, I'd rather pay 190 for this because it's gonna cost me $300 plus for the older version.

And I can't agree with Lewi1913 about the I buy for nostalgia not for quality crap. For $200, it better have a bit of both in that box I receive :lol:
 
Yall really talking bout suing nike for quality issues??

More or less false advertisement than anything. That whole article about the remastered 2015 is in print and false advertisement.
Probably wouldn't be anything to sue about if nike didn't publish that article of lies.
 
Size 13.5  unwearable unless your feet has the width of your head   , i don't wanted anyone to hurt them feet in them ....

Oh i donated a lot of shoes that a lot of   persona  would  throw these on sale on ebay instead .

I still donate to this day , every year  .... but this  2011 7  now way 

It's funny you ask me this  , like  it's the more important thing i wrote in my message .... ah you wanted these from me  i know :wink:  just kidding !

In general when you're upset  like i was you destroy , burn , beat , cut  .... whatever  makes you feel better  and you move on . 
 
Last edited:
More or less false advertisement than anything. That whole article about the remastered 2015 is in print and false advertisement.
Probably wouldn't be anything to sue about if nike didn't publish that article of lies.

Nah-False advestising is a lot harder to prove than one would think. Too expensive for plaintiffs to litigate and Nike would dead it with one phone call. "Show us proof of REMASTERED you corporate giants!!" Hypothetical Response-"Well in 2011 we used rubber for the midsole produced in Thailand, but for 2015 we used southern Burma rubber and we feel it's better for the shoe-hence Remastered" *Nike paralegal hangs up* :lol: They know how legally powerless the consumer is.
 
More or less false advertisement than anything. That whole article about the remastered 2015 is in print and false advertisement.
Probably wouldn't be anything to sue about if nike didn't publish that article of lies.

Nah-False advestising is a lot harder to prove than one would think. Too expensive for plaintiffs to litigate and Nike would dead it with one phone call. "Show us proof of REMASTERED you corporate giants!!" Hypothetical Response-"Well in 2011 we used rubber for the midsole produced in Thailand, but for 2015 we used southern Burma rubber and we feel it's better for the shoe-hence Remastered" *Nike paralegal hangs up* :lol: They know how legally powerless the consumer is.

I understand that BUT the article outlined improvements that we didn't see. The most basic example is the fingers on the Jumpman if I remember correctly.
Sony just settled a lawsuit over its ps vita due to false advertisement of features it didn't have so it's realistic that it can happen. If it does JB will probably just raise the prices to make us pay for the legal fees :lol:
 
I'm curious. Did anyone receive a pair with a not so jacked up toebox, or is that all pairs?
 
yep one of my two pairs were not  fluffy ... the one bought on Kickz.de  were the best  , the nikestore one acceptable  but since i returned them for sizing issue  ... i'm waiting for  new size 14 from different retailers  so  i hope to be blessed  .
 
Last edited:
yep one of my two pairs were not  fluffy ... the one bought on Kickz.de  were the best  , the nikestore one acceptable  but since i returned them for sizing issue  ... i'm waiting for  new size 14 from different retailers  so  i hope to be blessed  .

Yeah that's what kept me from copping. I want a decent looking pair. I don't wanna gamble
 
I don't understand why some of yall are so mad? Jordan 7s have never been known for high quality materials or being durable. It's actually one of the weakest Retros in the 1-14 series craftsmanship and material wise.

The toe box is OG and not thin and flat like the 2011s or Hares, maybe that toe bump will help with creasing? maybe that toe bump isn't their when walking? I understand we all paid over $200shipped and want that Quality. But then again Jordan 7s are no where near the construction of Foamposites.

All Jordan 7s are weak in Quality thats how the shoe has always been. These 2015s are really Light way lighter then the 2002s and the material is smoother than the Raptors. Also they fixed the Tab on back to be higher so they dont rip off and stand straight up like the 92s.

I'm happy with the 2015s Truer to OG with way better Tongue Colors, Nicer Bordeaux color, and Lighter in weight. I already knew the 7s weren't the best crafted Jordan Retros So I knew what I was getting.

Talking about lawsuits and complaints? All I will say is I'm down to sign a Petition that all Jordan Retros are Made in Italy like the 2s, I will pay $300 lol :smokin:smokin
 
I refuse to buy 2011 at 250$-350$ because at that point for crap quality possibly ur paying like 100 plus over retail for a dang jordan brand shoe with the reasoning of I refuse to give my 200$ for a 2015. so I went to pay resell on 2011.

Bruh what...... Who is doing that?

The quality difference between 2011 and 2015 does not warrent paying resell in 2011 pair cause u dang sure are not getting ur monies worth in improvement of quality. To make up the resell cost.
 
Back
Top Bottom