And this is why people get shot by the police....

Why should they have used lethal force on someone who didnt pose a lethal threat to them? This is a great example when NOT to shoot someone. Just because youre getting your butt whooped doesnt mean your life is in danger.
 
 
I would have shot him SO EARLY, then shot whoever was saying eff the police....then planted drugs on him.

VERY SERIOUS.
laugh.gif
 
 
I would have shot him SO EARLY, then shot whoever was saying eff the police....then planted drugs on him.

VERY SERIOUS.:lol:  

That Dave Chappelle skit comes to mind.

"Just sprinkle some crack on him and let's get the hell outta here."
 
Just watched the video again with volume. Looks like they did extract Taser... most likely this dude was on something.
 
Just watched the video again with volume. Looks like they did extract Taser... most likely this dude was on something.
nah...the first taser attempt failed because of the bulky clothing. The second taser took him down, because his shirt was off.
 
man tbh when he dropped that cop that musta felt real good. 

Props to the officers for squarring up though , if you watch the other video on the news fight the cop swings and runs away
roll.gif


then dude comes outta nowhere with a flying kick
roll.gif


they must not train hand to hand in the policy acadmay , these dudes look like they havnt fought since grade school . Swinging once and running 5 steps back
roll.gif


Dude brought out the super saiyan kick 
 
What's funny is that had there been no video, and all we had to go off of was the word of the cops, people would've said things like, "why would an unarmed dude attack two armed policemen?" We need body cams ASAP.
 
What's funny is that had there been no video, and all we had to go off of was the word of the cops, people would've said things like, "why would an unarmed dude attack two armed policemen?" We need body cams ASAP.


 If the cops shot him, imo I think it would be justified. You don't need a weapon on you "VISIBLY" to be perceived as a threat. If I'm a cop I'm not taking chances, this guy was lucky enough to run into cops that took that chance. I'm not getting into a fist fight with a perp, I MAY try a taser, if it doesn't work I'm unloading.



But yes, I am 100 percent for cameras on the police.


I agree with you.

I was talking about the people who automatically discount any official statement from police. Like had deadly force been used, and there was no footage, so all we could go off of was the word of the police, there would be people that automatically dismiss what the police said and they would ask questions like, "why would an unarmed guy attack two armed policemen." Like in this thread:

http://niketalk.com/t/614444/philly...-finally-had-a-weapon-he-stood-no-chance/0_20
 
Last edited:
What's funny is that had there been no video, and all we had to go off of was the word of the cops, people would've said things like, "why would an unarmed dude attack two armed policemen?" We need body cams ASAP.


 If the cops shot him, imo I think it would be justified. You don't need a weapon on you "VISIBLY" to be perceived as a threat. If I'm a cop I'm not taking chances, this guy was lucky enough to run into cops that took that chance. I'm not getting into a fist fight with a perp, I MAY try a taser, if it doesn't work I'm unloading.



But yes, I am 100 percent for cameras on the police.


I agree with you.

I was talking about the people who automatically discount any official statement from police. Like had deadly force been used, and there was no footage, so all we could go off of was the word of the police, there would be people that automatically dismiss what the police said and they would ask questions like, "why would an unarmed guy attack two armed policemen." Like in this thread:

http://niketalk.com/t/614444/philly...-finally-had-a-weapon-he-stood-no-chance/0_20
But even with a video now they think its cool the guy got in a fight with them :lol:

If he would have got shot people would have still found some way to say they could have just shot him in the finger instead
 
It was only one dude in that philly thread saying the police were wrong. Please stop reaching
 
So you either blow a dudes brains out or you decide to throw denm pawz?...

What kind of training are these cops getting?...where is the pepper spray, baton, taser?...you can put a dude down without killing him :tollin
 
You guys aren't looking at the main detail of this story.

Fried Chicken.

What is in fried chicken that makes people misbehave?

Why do we often see fight videos in or near a place serving some form of fried chicken?
 
So you either blow a dudes brains out or you decide to throw denm pawz?...

What kind of training are these cops getting?...where is the pepper spray, baton, taser?...you can put a dude down without killing him :tollin
They did taser him, a few times actually. They looked pretty determined NOT to shoot him. If they shot him, YET it would've been excessive. Put if they beat him down, like they did after they got him to the ground, I can't say he didn't deserve that.
 
So I can shoot some body for tryna throw hands with me?
Or is it I need to do 6 months in an academy and take a pledge first?
 
Back
Top Bottom