Terror Attack In Paris

Im not gonna pretend to be shocked.

Supposedly its a satirical paper that said something about mohhamed. Its a travesty. But not shocking in any way.

The french are naive. Right off the heals of voting to recognize a palestinian state they are thanked with a terrorist attack. They historically believe in appeasement anf it never works.

Europe has a long term problem with radical islamic terrorism and will continue to pretend they dont. But in germany there are already big protests. We shall see.
 
So if you agree that the attacks today weren't by Muslim terrorists, then I"m sure you wouldn't call the attacks in that link Christian terrorism right?
It implies that there's nonexistence in regards to media coverage of what can be deemed as acts of Christian terrorism; whenever attacks as such are committed by Extreme Christians, white supremacists, and far-right militia groups the narrative is one of a deranged individual rather than an indictment against the individual's religious beliefs.

The Oklahoma City Bombing was akin to a terrorist attack, but the picture of McVeigh in contrast to a person of color would probably not illicit the same response from you.
 
Last edited:
It implies that there's nonexistence in regards to media coverage of what can be deemed as acts of Christian terrorism; whenever attacks as such are committed by Extreme Christians, white supremacists, and far-right militia groups the narrative is one of a deranged individual rather than an indictment against the individual's religious beliefs.

The Oklahoma City Bombing was akin to a terrorist attack, but the picture of McVeigh in contrast to a person of color would probably not illicit the same response from you.

No, I don't have my head in the sand like so many liberals do. If there was a large scale problem with Christian terrorism in the world, I would call it for what it is. But there's not.

The Oklahoma City bombing was 19 years ago. How many acts of Islamic terrorism have occurred since then?
 
No, I don't have my head in the sand like so many liberals do. If there was a large scale problem with Christian terrorism in the world, I would call it for what it is. But there's not.

The Oklahoma City bombing was 19 years ago. How many acts of Islamic terrorism have occurred since then?
There has always been a large scale problem with Christan terrorism...it's just more insidious.

The article covers 10 terrorist attacks committed by so-called Christian terrorists....and drone strikes delivered by the United States could also fall under the same umbrella.
 
It implies that there's nonexistence in regards to media coverage of what can be deemed as acts of Christian terrorism; whenever attacks as such are committed by Extreme Christians, white supremacists, and far-right militia groups the narrative is one of a deranged individual rather than an indictment against the individual's religious beliefs.

The Oklahoma City Bombing was akin to a terrorist attack, but the picture of McVeigh in contrast to a person of color would probably not illicit the same response from you.

No, I don't have my head in the sand like so many liberals do. If there was a large scale problem with Christian terrorism in the world, I would call it for what it is. But there's not.

The Oklahoma City bombing was 19 years ago. How many acts of Islamic terrorism have occurred since then?

Look how many acts of police brutality there has been but you guys still cry about them being generalized. Look at what you're doing now.


http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrite
 
RIP to the victims, since nobody else seems to care.

Holier than thou attitudes make you look ridiculous if anyone is wondering. None of you are without fault.

Pay respects and stop being ********.
 
Last edited:
There has always been a large scale problem with Christan terrorism...it's just more insidious.

The article covers 10 terrorist attacks committed by so-called Christian terrorists.

No it doesn't. Did you read your own article?

This argument is so tiresome and dishonest. Orwell would be disappointed.

I'm in favor of a non-interventionist foreign policy, don't hate Muslims, think Bush and Obama are war criminals, think the West is complicit in the rise of Islamic terrorism dating back at least to WW1, don't want tax dollars supporting Israel, etc etc etc. But this dishonesty is so pathetic.
 
Last edited:


This vid is a joke :lol:

I'm not calling a Muslim radical because they don't like the United states....this country has blood on its hands over there so they have every right to feel how they choose to feel

They're radicals but we're the good almighty God serving Christians....this country morally is a ******* joke
 
Last edited:


This vid is a joke :lol:

I'm not calling a Muslim radical because they don't like the United states....this country has blood on its hands over there so they have every right to feel how they choose to feel

They're radicals but we're the good almighty God serving Christians....this country morally is a ******* joke


Paris, France, not Paris, Texas.

Edit:
Wait a minute. Weren't you the one defending the CIA's torture program? :lol: Make up your mind.
 
Last edited:


This vid is a joke :lol:

I'm not calling a Muslim radical because they don't like the United states....this country has blood on its hands over there so they have every right to feel how they choose to feel

They're radicals but we're the good almighty God serving Christians....this country morally is a ******* joke


Paris, France, not Paris, Texas.


Talking about the video and the conservative trolls in this thread

I know where it happened so don't be a ****
 
Couple observations:

1. This paper has a history of mocking Islam.

2. If they were mocking Jesus, and some Christians got pissed and shot up this place, they would not be labeled "terrorists".



I'm a huge proponent of free speech, but you should understand the consequences of actions when you mock the world 2nd largest religion.



RIP to the innocent loss of life.
 
Back
Top Bottom