I'm not hearing good things about it.
FOX *CBM thread - RIP STAN LEE - Dark PhoeniX 06/07/19
- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
I'm telling you right now, boarder line pointless
- 73,041
- 59,788
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
Looks like Nightcrawler, Jean (w/ an 80s haircut as well?), Scott and Jubilee.
View media item 1510068
View media item 1510068
- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
Is that hipster night crawler?
- 73,041
- 59,788
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
Go a page back.
- 73,041
- 59,788
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
- 21,183
- 18,095
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2007
- 16,413
- 8,760
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2012
- 53,150
- 20,699
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
Reminds me of emo peter parker from spiderman 3.
- 73,041
- 59,788
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
- 10,845
- 9,064
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
Jubileee son?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
This>>>>>Avengers 2
This>>>>>Avengers 2
- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
Since I've been banned from the avengers thread for asking for a link I'll say my part about it here 
1. Overall the movie was good, NOT GREAT
2. Twins were meh
3. QS was utterly pointless and not used in the movie
4. Plot was paper thin
5. Hulk/widow love interest seem to come out of nowhere and nobody really cared as a result
6. Action scenes were good as to be expected
7. Much better pacing than the first
8. Hawkeye still sucks
9. Ultron was ok. His humor looked out of place
10. Major "dooms day" device seemed to of come from nowhere
11. Vision was meh
12. Best parts of the movie was when they were just "people" hanging out so to speak, interacting with each other
Overall: 7.0
1. Overall the movie was good, NOT GREAT
2. Twins were meh
3. QS was utterly pointless and not used in the movie
4. Plot was paper thin
5. Hulk/widow love interest seem to come out of nowhere and nobody really cared as a result
6. Action scenes were good as to be expected
7. Much better pacing than the first
8. Hawkeye still sucks
9. Ultron was ok. His humor looked out of place
10. Major "dooms day" device seemed to of come from nowhere
11. Vision was meh
12. Best parts of the movie was when they were just "people" hanging out so to speak, interacting with each other
Overall: 7.0
- 73,041
- 59,788
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
really?The generic comic book, sci-fi, supernatural, etc... thread might be a better outlet to post your Avengers review?
http://niketalk.com/t/248810/news-o...-ts-natural-phenomenon-paranormal-based-films
- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
Someone said they had one so I ask if it was true.
Whatever, it's my fault
Whatever, it's my fault
- 73,041
- 59,788
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
Ahh, doesn't seem like a big deal.
I've been avoiding that thread so I have no clue what the hell is going on there right now.
I've been avoiding that thread so I have no clue what the hell is going on there right now.
- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
It was getting very spoilery. You're doing the right thing
Bend_The_Knee
formerly gotholesinmysocks
- 61,322
- 22,997
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2008
The generic comic book, sci-fi, supernatural, etc... thread might be a better outlet to post your Avengers review?
http://niketalk.com/t/248810/news-o...-ts-natural-phenomenon-paranormal-based-films
Generic?
- 73,041
- 59,788
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
Yup! It's not specific to any studio (marvel, dc/wb, fox, etc...) or genre (sci-fi only, horror only, superhero only, etc...).
Why you always got to pick on me :\
Why you always got to pick on me :\
- 73,041
- 59,788
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
This should make plenty ecstatic if true:
Not sure what it means for the franchise. It could mean a reboot or soft reboot (where no more origins and they pick up the team in the present time to conincide with F4 and Deadpool films(?) along with the upcoming XFactor. Or as most have been begging for, a return to Marvel (yah probably opening a can of worms there ).
Not sure what it means for the franchise. It could mean a reboot or soft reboot (where no more origins and they pick up the team in the present time to conincide with F4 and Deadpool films(?) along with the upcoming XFactor. Or as most have been begging for, a return to Marvel (yah probably opening a can of worms there
).
Last edited:
Sir San Diego
formerly brolic scholar
- 12,456
- 10,878
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2011
[quote name=RFX45]View media item 1510068[/quote]
It's a young Nightcrawler, so I'm not tripping on the Flock of Seagulls cut. And yes that style was around in the 80s.
My childhood... on screen?
Can't wait to see Psylocke!!!
It's a young Nightcrawler, so I'm not tripping on the Flock of Seagulls cut. And yes that style was around in the 80s.
My childhood... on screen?
Can't wait to see Psylocke!!!
Last edited:
- 24,924
- 23,211
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2010
Olivia Munn is going to look way older than them.
Is Psylocke going to be from the future?
Is Psylocke going to be from the future?
- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
I was a munn fan during the AOTS days but her actually playing a legitimate character will fail. I'm thinking (hoping) she gets a small non speaking cameo and that's it.
- 24,924
- 23,211
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2010
That's going to piss people off just as much as Mei Melancon's Psylocke in X3.
Eventually Fox/Singer are going to have to introduce and focus on new characters in these films.
Last edited:
Bend_The_Knee
formerly gotholesinmysocks
- 61,322
- 22,997
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2008
Yup! It's not specific to any studio (marvel, dc/wb, fox, etc...) or genre (sci-fi only, horror only, superhero only, etc...).
Why you always got to pick on me :\
Oh don't you play the victim. You know damn well what i meant by comics, since you've been a contributor of that thread since day one.
Imagine if the X Men franchise gets bought by Disney-Marvel? I'm calling it now, by 2019 a deal gets done.
Last edited:
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
I've been avoiding the Avengers thread like the plague. I had the >: face when I glimpsed what looked like a review for that movie in here just now
I quickly scrolled down
C'mon fam
I quickly scrolled down
C'mon fam
