Jordan XI '72-10' Release Date: 12/12/15

Plenty of players get fresh shoes for every game. Some even change into a new pair at halftime.
 
exactly. so why wouldn't he ask for a fresh pair of Jams to go along with his acting debut. You don't think he would have needed it to go toe to toe with these clowns?? 
 
:lol: so explain to me why the pairs are different then

23 instead of 45 and dark blue jumpman instead of concord

Because it looks like you guys PE arguement just got rekt
 
jmikele said:
 
Plenty of players get fresh shoes for every game. Some even change into a new pair at halftime.
Click to expand...
Some for fun, others simply destroy them. Remember LBJ leaving a skid mark a couple years back. Its about comfort and marketing. Lest we forget Gilbert "50 shades of adidas" Arenas and all his colorways?
 
RustyShackleford said:
laugh.gif
so explain to me why the pairs are different then

23 instead of 45 and dark blue jumpman instead of concord

Because it looks like you guys PE arguement just got rekt
Click to expand...
I'm not with the PE classification of the Jams. I said they were retro + because of those small differences. But I mean come on bro, yall are making it seem like they're 2 completely different shoes when they're 95% aesthetically identical. Just like with the DMP 11s and the concords.
 
greg12345678900 said:
RustyShackleford said:
:lol: so explain to me why the pairs are different then


23 instead of 45 and dark blue jumpman instead of concord


Because it looks like you guys PE arguement just got rekt
Click to expand...
I'm not with the PE classification of the Jams. I said they were retro + because of those small differences. But I mean come on bro, yall are making it seem like they're 2 completely different shoes when they're 95% aesthetically identical. Just like with the DMP 11s and the concords.
Click to expand...

Brah you know what my bad. I after reading through my post I realize that I'm to articulating my point very well and straight have made some mistakes in my argument.

But for the last time. My stance in that the colorway exist back in 95-96.

The problem is that unlike the Concords and the DMPs that are similar but called two different names. Every iteration of the "Spacejam" colorway share the same nickname. Whether they have a Concord Jumpman, Blue Jumpman, 45 on the back,or 23.

The OG Spacejam colorway/pairs have a Concord Jumpman (this is where I was being confusing) and the Retros have blue one.

I kinda realize now the the argument is really just based stems from the nickname more than anything else
 
Interesting...

Edit
.. And people are gonna pay $225 for that!? That tumbled leather will have folks memorized thinking premium. But only to be fooled with a lighter wallet.
 
Last edited:
Meh. We'll see. Looks like no iridescent PL which is a good sign for most, me included.
 
RustyShackleford said:
PmpDaddyRobFord said:
RustyShackleford said:
^^^ Brah people are not arguing if the 2000s pairs are OGs, they're obviously retros.

We're saying the colorway is a OG colorway as opposed to a retro + colorway
Click to expand...
but... the colorway is retro+.... it didn't exist until 2000...
Click to expand...

So what colorway was in the 1996 movie?
Click to expand...
Like I said, in the movie he had on the black concord PE. they were concord in color but the cameras picked it up wrong and showed as blue. that in turn later gave influence to the retro+ that came out on Dec in 2000


and wtf is wit that see through patent leatger(plastic) crap? smh
also, fakes should be showing up soon on sites. apparently released 2 days ago but I doubt they got the shoe right
 
Last edited:
^^^ Let it go B.

I seen you post in a couple threads. It seems like you love to be right.

I don't know what we even arguing over anymore when I concede the 2000 pairs are retros.

We basically arguing over a nickname really. That's how convoluted this argument has gotten

Waits for you to quote me to get in the last word..................
 
Last edited:
RustyShackleford said:
^^^ Let it go B.

I seen you post in a couple threads. It seems like you love to be right.

I don't know what we even arguing over anymore when I concede the 2000 pairs are retros.

We basically arguing over a nickname really. That's how convoluted this argument has gotten

Waits for you to quote me to get in the last word..................
Click to expand...
thought we tryin to talk about the pic tho, b
 
Interesting pix...will pass judgement once I see the full kick *praying for a higher cut pl*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Arthur Shelby
Air Jordan 3 Doernbecher “Hugo” - December 2nd $210
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
airforce1king
airforce1king

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom