- 16
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
I just bought it. UPC number is matching with nike.com receipt. Can anyone help me to look it? Thanks.
Last edited:
2012 Jordan 11 Bred CHECK PLEASE
- Thread in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' Thread starter Started by labifan62,
- Start date
- 16
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
@TIMMYBRIXXX please help.
Last edited:
- 16
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
@sneakerp @agsz @from88til @bcdagr8 @cashm0neyand1 @RickyRiebel Please help me. I know you guys good for LC. Thx
Last edited:
- 5,692
- 1,762
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
All the way good brotha. 100% legit '12 Retro Bred 11's.
- 16
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
Thanks a lot man
- 88
- 26
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2015
legit man...
- 2,060
- 515
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
Toe box looks off,the 3 rd lace hole looks off left shoe
- 16
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
Thx. What the toe box should be looks like? What 3rd lace hole suppose be like?
- 2,060
- 515
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
Maybe it's just a bad angle on pic 5# of toe box,looks too long. The 3 rd lace the placing looks off it should look like the other shoe more evenly spread
- 16
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
ok. IC the different.c And I double check the shoes. The left 3rd lace hole really is different from the right one. so otherwise are good to go? And you think they are legit or not?
- 2,060
- 515
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
I notice in some areas the stitching on the patent leather looks bad or that could be bad photo shots. It's up 2 u,im sure these aren't cheap either,would I spend 350+ on a pair that has imperfections...idk
- 16
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
So I am assuming you try to tell me its imperfections but still legit?
- 2,060
- 515
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
If u ask me...I'd say fakes, I could be wrong.
- 16
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
Thanks man.
- 2,060
- 515
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
Np,u can thank me with reps 
- 16
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
I just found my legit gamma blue which I bought from ISS. The 3rd lace hole are off too. It makes me cry.
- 16
- 13
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2015
Last edited:
- 10,288
- 3,826
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
Toebox does look long to me as well and 23s look a bit wonky and the collar shapes. Also CF looks off also..The new run of fakes of these are pretty damn close..If i had to weigh in id say these are the newer fakes..Id return them personally, but ultimately thats your call bro.
- 8,274
- 2,165
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2001
Tough Call. toe box looks a bit long, the paper is a tad on the dark side. 23s are a little funny too. I mention in previous post that the high quality fakes of the Bred 11 is nearly 100% identical. It really hard to tell
- 16
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
Thank you and @cashm0neyand1 I should just return it. I bought it from this guy @PureMichigan He has good feedback on eBay and NikeTalk.com also. But I need @ him and email him too see what's going on.
- 771
- 67
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2013
They're authentic straight from nike.com w/receipt (not that it matters I guess lol) , they looked identical to to my CDP breds also 9.5 and DS. But if you don't feel comfortable with the purchase I'll take them back that's no biggie. I'll do a comparison maybe with my pair and you guys can set me straight.
- 16
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
yea I saw the 23 but the cut actually is good its cuz the angle when I took the photo
- 16
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
Yea. I will email to you thx for replay me. And I hope once you get the shoes you can create a thread on NikeTalk about your comparison between '12 bred and your CDP. Thx
- 5,692
- 1,762
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
Still legit to me. I've had several pairs of these and one of them had 23's that look off like that. The shoes probably look off because the tongue isn't tucked in normally.
