Lakers OFF-SEASON IS A WRAP

Lakers’ G.M. Mitch Kupchak a ‘worry-wart’ ahead of NBA draft lottery

His work here just started, a two-day process that will involve watching plenty of workout drills and asking plenty of questions.

But as Lakers general manager Mitch Kupchak began his duties at the NBA pre-draft combine both to evaluate and interview 18 different college prospects, another issue remains on his radar.

It has become one that has made Kupchak both hopeful and concerned as the Lakers head into next Tuesday’s NBA draft lottery in New York.

Hopeful because the Lakers’ 21-61 record marked the league’s fourth-worst record and the worst in franchise history, giving them an 82.8 percent chance of ensuring a top-five pick. Concerned because the Lakers also have a 17.2 percent chance of falling either to sixth or seventh, forcing them to trade the pick to Philadelphia as part of the Steve Nash deal.

“It’s completely out of our control. But I’m somewhat of a worry-wart,” Kupchak said on Thursday in an interview with the Los Angeles News Group. “I know our percentage is very high that we end up with a top-five pick, but I have to prepare for if we don’t get it. We’ll be prepared either way.”

So how will the Lakers handle landing in the top five?

“If we get a pick, that’s an asset,” Kupchak said. “That’s an asset you can use to trade or work to use it on the player in the draft.”

And what if the Lakers lose the pick?

“If we don’t,” Kupchak said, “we’ll still be able to carry on and move forward.”

Kupchak declined to share how. But the Lakers will also have the 27th and 34th overall picks, nine roster spots available and enough cap space to sign one free agent to a maximum contract. In addition to having guaranteed contracts for Kobe Bryant, Nick Young, Ryan Kelly and Julius Randle, the Lakers will also retain rookies Jordan Clarkson and Tarik Black on non-guaranteed deals.

The Lakers prefer filling one of those empty roster spots with a top-five pick, obviously. But Kupchak declined to specify to what degree a lost lottery pick would hurt the Lakers’ rebuilding efforts. He sounded equally vague on what impact a top-five pick could make.

“It depends. I think there is a difference between one and five,” Kupchak said. “If you look at a lot of the mock draft stuff, it looks as if the big guys will be taken early. Then at three, four or five, maybe you’re looking at guys who aren’t big.”

As Kupchak suggested, most mock drafts rank Kentucky center Karl Anthony-Towns, Duke center Jahil Okafor, China point point guard Emmanuel Mudiay, Ohio State point guard D’Angelo Russell and Duke small forward Justise Winslow in order. Anthony-Towns, Okafor and Mudiay skipped all of the drill and interview sessions.

Yet, Kupchak declined to rank which positions he considers his biggest priority, other than saying, “we can use help at any of those.”

The only clarity Kupchak provided involved Lakers coach Byron Scott, who will serve as the team’s draft representative. Since the 2014-15 season ended, Kupchak said he and executive vice president of player personnel Jim Buss have talked with Scott in meetings he described as “all good,” mindful the Lakers missed an NBA-record 339 games in the 2014-15 season because of injuries.

“Byron did the best he could do under the circumstances,” said Kupchak, who added Scott has not determined if he will make changes to his coaching staff. “We’re very happy with him as a coach.”

Will the Lakers become happy with what happens next week during the NBA draft lottery? An anxious few days await.

“It’s an important day for us and we’re hopeful that we get a top-five pick,” Kupchak said. “But even if we don’t, we’re confident that we will be able to get this team on track.”

Click to expand...

PMatic said:

Slightly late, but yeah Thibbs, not a good job coaching this team this year.

Players determine the games more times than not, but at the same time you see coaches at work with their plays out of timeouts, minutes management and rotations. And well, he failed. The team was plenty deep too.

Click to expand...

DarthSka said:

The Bulls have a legit struggle offense. If you're going to question why someone was playing despite not hitting shots, that rules out the entire roster in one swoop. Only Mirotic and Butler would get consistent minutes.

Click to expand...

Essential1 said:

Typical Cleansneaks... Comes at the King and always misses

Game 1:

2nd chance Points
Cavs - 17 (7/12)
Bulls – 17 (7/11)


Game 2:

2nd chance Points
Cavs - 23 (8/13)
Bulls – 15 (4/11)

Game 3:

2nd chance Points
Cavs - 7 (2/9)
Bulls – 18 (7/1


Game 4:

2nd chance Points
Cavs - 10 (4/8 )
Bulls – 10 (5/11)


Game 5:

2nd chance Points
Cavs - 14 (3/9)
Bulls – 23 (7/14)


Game 6:

2nd chance Points
Cavs - 24 (10/1
Bulls – 12 (5/9)


View media item 1534968

Click to expand...

cleansneaksonly21 said:

Essential1 said:

Typical Cleansneaks... Comes at the King and always misses

Game 1:

2nd chance Points
Cavs - 17 (7/12)
Bulls – 17 (7/11)


Game 2:

2nd chance Points
Cavs - 23 (8/13)
Bulls – 15 (4/11)

Game 3:

2nd chance Points
Cavs - 7 (2/9)
Bulls – 18 (7/1


Game 4:

2nd chance Points
Cavs - 10 (4/8 )
Bulls – 10 (5/11)


Game 5:

2nd chance Points
Cavs - 14 (3/9)
Bulls – 23 (7/14)


Game 6:

2nd chance Points
Cavs - 24 (10/1
Bulls – 12 (5/9)


View media item 1534968

Click to expand...

That was cute. Really was. Thank you.

Still no context of game situation of said rebs.... but we'll go there.

So Game 1 and Game 4 was a WASH even on 2nd chance pts.... they even split those 2 games 1-1 so really a complete wash against the BIGGER team.

Game 2 and Game 6 were in favor of my opinion.... Cavs sweep those games 2-0.

Game 5.... Didn't matter....LeBron light switch was flipped... lets move on.

That leaves Game 3, every good data collection has an "outlier" and Bulls win on a completely fluke of a shot another... once a lifetime event.


Blatt gets 0 credit for the "wins" besides (cover your ears Kobe) he has the highest Basketball IQ player/coach in the league leading his team.


This blaming coaches has to stop, players decision making in the game impact the NBA 10x more.

A below average coach + the Cavs 7 > A very good coach + Bulls 9.

Click to expand...

Game 2:

Cavs Offensive Rebounds – 14
Bulls Offensive Rebounds – 11

Cavs Defensive Rebounds – 31
Bulls Defensive Rebounds – 26


2nd chance Points
Cavs - 23 (8/13)
Bulls – 15 (4/11)


But let’s look closer shall we?

The Bulls lost the game by 15. Including a 38-18 1st quarter.

In the 1st quarter of Game 2.

Bulls had 3 offensive rebounds to Cavs 2. Bulls 3 2nd Chance points on1/4 shooting. Cavs 3 2nd chance points on1/2 shooting. So rebounding had very little to do why the Bulls started the 2nd quarter down 20.

Click to expand...

Kal-El-8 said:

Jeff ain't that bad. I listen for jokes not insight or information tho

Click to expand...