Lakers OFF-SEASON IS A WRAP

How Many Regular Season Games Do You Think Kobe Will Play This Year?

  • 1-10

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 11-20

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 21-35

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 36-49

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 50-65

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 66-75

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • He Plays The Entire Season

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Status
Not open for further replies.
If Mitch can land us Boogie , the Number #6 pick with just giving up the # 2
:smokin :smokin :smokin

reading some stuff about Lakers taking the option on Hill's last year to make the money work.That or possibly trade Nick Young
 
You guys are delusional not wanting to give up Randle for Cousins lmao.

Did you guys not watch Cousins last season? Especially that stretch where he was putting up 28+ and 12+ almost every night?!
 
You guys are delusional not wanting to give up Randle for Cousins lmao.

Did you guys not watch Cousins last season? Especially that stretch where he was putting up 28+ and 12+ almost every night?!

with a 29-53 record to end the year :pimp:
 
Last edited:
You guys are delusional not wanting to give up Randle for Cousins lmao.

Did you guys not watch Cousins last season? Especially that stretch where he was putting up 28+ and 12+ almost every night?!

with a 29-53 record to end the year :pimp:

Don't do that man. They went through a **** show with the coaching changes and when everybody were healthy the Kings started the year off actually decent.

Idk man, I just think Cousins is a top 10 player in the game.
 
You guys are delusional not wanting to give up Randle for Cousins lmao.

We're not delusional enough to think it will only take Randle.

I know it wouldn't be randle straight up. I'm reading in here 2nd + Randle? Knowing the Lakers history, I have a feeling they can get Cousins while swindling the Kings.

I'm just going by posts saying fans wouldn't want to give up Randle + the 2nd pick. I believe Cousins is worth it.
 
Nah he's not as talented as he is. Cost control+youth+potential > Boogie right now.
 
Boogie is under contract and they view him as untradeable. They don't need to trade him.

The Lakers won't be the ones doing the swindling.
 
If it just cost a # 2 pick don't know why you wouldn't want to do it
Dude averaged 24 and 12 last year and he's not even in his prime!

If they do it and it just cost one pick, I'm cool with it. If they decide not to or can't make the trade, I'm happy with Okafor as well. Bottom line is the team is gonna be a whole lot better next year than the crap we've seen the last two years. Im just excited about that.
 
Most of us would do it if the cost is just the #2 pick, and the cost is offset mostly.

But the reality is..... He has 3 years left on his contract, his owner said he is not on the market.

2 things that drive up his price.


In the end, you're likely parting with Okafor, Randle, Clarkson and getting just Boogie in return.... That's a horrific trade for us.


The Kings are not giving us the # 6 back. They are not going to trade Boogie just to get Vucevic & move up 1 spot in the draft.



You guys really don't want Cousins if it means just drafting four slots down?

Tell me how / why and in what world would the Kings trade Boogie & the # 6 pick for the # 2 pick?
 
Last edited:
I'm going off what I've read in here, maybe I read incorrectly. I didn't see any of our other players listed in those tweets did I miss that?
 
Someone just needs to forward Vivek a youtube link of Boogies highlights from last season to remind him that Boogie is untouchable :nerd:
 
I'm going off what I've read in here, maybe I read incorrectly. I didn't see any of our other players listed in those tweets did I miss that?

One of the guys thought the Lakers can trade just the #2 pick for Boogie AND #6... don't go by what's in here :lol:

I don't think the Kings and Lakers are actually discussing names. The Orlando 3-way came from a random Twitter account. But if they were discussing names, I'd expect Randle and Clarkson to be involved.
 
All of these online reports slightly differentiating from each other, playing with my emotions.

I'm gonna be locked in on draft day, see how things pan out and I'll be on the lookout for whatever Woj reports.
 
Last edited:
Getting Vucevic, #5, 27, 34 wouldn't be bad for SAC

Nikola is a slept on beast and if they feel they no longer want to deal with Boogies antics, it's a good deal for them
 
Getting Vucevic, #5, 27, 34 wouldn't be bad for SAC

Nikola is a slept on beast and if they feel they no longer want to deal with Boogies antics, it's a good deal for them
Exactly the way I feel also hear Jordan Hill option will be picked to be involved in the deal also up in order to match salaries 

Get Boogie now before someone else does 
 
24 y/o Cs that average 24/12 don't become available often.... You gotta kick the tires. HARD.

Also... I'm blame the reported "meh" workouts of both D'Lo and Jah for this even being an option. IMO if either one of them went in there and killed it this wouldn't even be considered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom