Nike Air Jordan 4 Retro "White/Cement" - The Aftermath - NO BUYING/SELLING/TRADING

Seeing the 99s and 16s, they're pretty close. The 99s has a slightly better shape, but the 16s aren't too far off. If the leather is like UNC's I'll be VERY pleased because that leather was A1. The density and fire red hits makes me give the the 16s the nod over the 99s. The 99 speckles look
Barren by comparison.
 
Major lag, but I've been really busy and meant to have these up awhile back.

View media item 1899906Main differences; tongue and collar is overall more plush on the '99. Wings are slightly higher, tab eyelets are larger, grey is lighter.
View media item 1899905View media item 1899904View media item 1899903The tab is slightly lower and is curved to the heel cup, opposed to the '99 being more higher flat, and the font being more separated.
View media item 1899902That density :pimp:
View media item 1899901Tabs used to be really thick, not they're made out of a sort of vinyl material.
View media item 1899911Red herringbone traction pod and NIKE is more of a fire red, rather than varsity red
View media item 18999001999 $100 2016 $220 More than double the price.
View media item 1899899Accessories

Solid pick up. The material is pretty soft, the shoe is not too much different from the '12 but the made all the right changes. Most will be happy, some will be disappointed.
I'm saying it... I'm liking the 2016 more because of the speckle density.. The tighter look to the shoe no wide back tabs.. 99s look good too but out with the old & in with the new
 
Last edited:
The shape has gotten better...... 2016 look less banana shape I'm happy camper overall. Long time waiting!
 
Last edited:
Since the day these were announced to re-retro, I vowed to fall back and not scoop them. I've been slowly getting rid of the collection....


....but these...as it gets closer and closer to the release date, I'm getting more and more pulled in. :x :smh: :wow:

These are simply just one of the greatest shoes of all time. I gotta be strong. |I
 
Is the leather comparable to the recent oreo 4 retro, bro?



-Drew

The leather is thicker on the oreos. The leather on these have the feel of the maroon 6s..
But sa.e comfort as the oreos.

These feel way better than previous cement 4s that felt like hard plastic.
 
I'm from Los Angeles, but I'm gonna be in NYC for vacation on release day. Any stores in Manhattan that do FCFS? Can't do raffles since I won't be there early enough.
On the launch locator for foot action every store in Manhattan and the Bronx doing fcfs and footlocker should be the same
 
Last edited:
[emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji]
 
I'm wearing these out the store.

young kids will be wondering what I'm doing

this release calls for it

LOL i used to laugh at my boy for doing that but yesterday I was thinking of doing the same thing. Like you said you gotta do it with these :smokin. I'll even take a pic if im successful winning a raffle.
 
Last edited:
I have the 2012 and the leather on these are bad!

These seem very cheap

Question. So according to you if leather creases is it bad quality?

Because the material on the 2012s were the worst, Payless/K-Mart brand shoe quality. Nike should have been ashamed to have put those out. Probably why the started doing the "remastered" thing. Suckas were still buying, but they were also losing a lot of loyal customers too.
 
Question. So according to you if leather creases is it bad quality?

Because the material on the 2012s were the worst, Payless/K-Mart brand shoe quality. Nike should have been ashamed to have put those out. Probably why the started doing the "remastered" thing. Suckas were still buying, but they were also losing a lot of loyal customers too.

I wish I took more pics of the shoe, but yeah the leather is cheap! It isn't " remastered " quality !

When you guys have in hand you will understand.

With all honesty I feel like the 2012 were made better [emoji]128554[/emoji]
 
Back
Top Bottom