- 21,798
- 30,436
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
do you know how much data it would take to transmit real time google earth images of the entire world and keep it running 24/7?
Who said anything about it running 24/7?
Chocolate earth
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by doublemesh96,
- Start date
Who said anything about it running 24/7?
- 743
- 204
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2015
What's the thing snipers have to account for when they're shooting their rifle? The Coriolos effect? Why does that effect bullets but not planes?
- 21,798
- 30,436
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
http://gizmodo.com/5909215/this-is-the-definitive-photograph-of-planet-earth
Mainly because of light. I'm not sure if you know how cameras work, but it's mainly about exposure.
The Earth is extremely bright when the sun is exposed to it. To take a proper photo, you need to underexpose it in order to get the details of the Earth. Unfortunately, this washes out the stars. If you overexpose it in order to get photos of the stars, the Earth would just be a white blob.
Basically, the sun is bright as ****.
Again nasa is claiming this is a true image of the planet. That's a perfect sphere. What happened to the oblate spheroid?
It does affect planes
- 743
- 204
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2015
Have any of you guys who actually full believe the earth is round actually taken the time to watch some of these flat earth videos?
- 32,585
- 80,505
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2013
But.......it does
Looking like a sphere and actually being a sphere are two different things. If it's close to being a sphere but isn't what would you call it? It's not perfectly round so you can't say sphere.Again nasa is claiming this is a true image of the planet. That's a perfect sphere. What happened to the oblate spheroid?http://gizmodo.com/5909215/this-is-the-definitive-photograph-of-planet-earth
Mainly because of light. I'm not sure if you know how cameras work, but it's mainly about exposure.
The Earth is extremely bright when the sun is exposed to it. To take a proper photo, you need to underexpose it in order to get the details of the Earth. Unfortunately, this washes out the stars. If you overexpose it in order to get photos of the stars, the Earth would just be a white blob.
Basically, the sun is bright as ****.
- 743
- 204
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2015
How so?
- 21,798
- 30,436
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
Google oblate spheroid. There's no way in hell you can mistake that for a perfect sphere come on now.
It works in the same way that it works with bullets, but it's not as apparent because a plane can change and correct it's path
- 36,045
- 12,024
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
Even for 30 seconds, we don't have the tech to stream that much data.do you know how much data it would take to transmit real time google earth images of the entire world and keep it running 24/7?
Who said anything about it running 24/7?
Plus it would still involve multiple images from multiple satellites being stitched together
- 32,585
- 80,505
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2013
The Earth barely deviates from being an actual sphere so using the eye test it's going to look like one. I don't know what else to tell you.
It's like drawing a circle. No one can draw a circle but they can draw something pretty damn close so that you won't complain.
But if you don't believe me why don't you tell me what shape the Earth is. Let's go from there.
- 36,045
- 12,024
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
Unless you were there during the week the earth was created it's hard to know for sure
- 743
- 204
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2015
Well I guess the way it was created comes down to if you believe in God or not
- 21,798
- 30,436
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
According to Neil degrasse Tyson it's an oblate spheroid. Now take that pic that the nasa scientist claimed to be a true image of earth and Google perfect circle and compare the two. Then compare an oblate spheroid to the perfect circle and see how off it is.
All the **** we've done and technology we have yet we don't have enough data to get even a clip of the entire earth from space? Something just doesn't add up to me.
- 36,045
- 12,024
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
You do know that NDT himself accepts those images as accurate pictures of the earth right?
- 21,798
- 30,436
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
Got it so where's the images of earth that look even remotely oblate? They all look like photoshopped spheres
- 21,798
- 30,436
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
I'm waiting for some independent researchers/scientists not on the space programs payroll to provide some images. That's it. No theories or explanations just visual imagery.
- 36,045
- 12,024
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
because a 10 by 10.003 square is not technically a square but the difference is so small that the human eye can't tell the difference.
Last edited:
- 19,563
- 6,838
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2009
- 4,616
- 1,404
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
My question is , if youre so skeptical , why would you believe the independent group is not funded by "they"?
- 21,798
- 30,436
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
you could say the same for the flat earth
some of yall simple minded dweebs
I'm not making an argument for the earth being flat I've stated that. I'm just looking for an actual image of it.
- 36,045
- 12,024
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
The spacex photos of the earth look like a sphere too
- 21,798
- 30,436
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
I can't really respond to the **** you've been saying because youre just being facetious youre not asking real questions.
Last edited:
