OFFICIAL 2015 FANTASY FOOTBALL THREAD

thinking bout starting (standard)

Eiffert over Olsen

Woodhead over Yeldon

am I being foolish?
 
I'm kinda iffy on Rodgers vs the Hawks without Bulaga, even at home, and even with Seattle shaky without Kam. It's either that, or Flacco at Oakland. I wanna say Flacco can carve up Oakland, but I just don't trust him.
 
I just don't know who Flacco is going to throw to in order to carve anybody up right now. That offense should be a struggle with 37 year old Steve Smith and Justin Forsett as their only playmakers. Idk what their front office was thinking this summer going out like that.
 
Last edited:
You drafted Rodgers in the first or second round for a reason, if you don't feel comfortable starting him for 15 games, you wasted a draft pick.
 
JJ Watt said:
Hopefully we win this money league and I got you on Hoboken drinks
Click to expand...
Would have sent you my summer cheat sheet, had I known you were playing serious money league(s). Had to go private this year, only sent to johnnyredstorm johnnyredstorm and @dland24.

davinci said:
thinking bout starting (standard)

Eiffert over Olsen
Woodhead over Yeldon
Click to expand...
Perfectly fine on your TE situation. Eifert and Olsen are slotted right near each other in Week 2 positional rankings. Eifert's stock is trending upwards as he's hitting his stride in Year 3. He showed flashes his rookie season, although I wouldn't expect 9/104/2 weekly.

I would prefer Yeldon in standard formats because you lose significant value with Woodhead's pass-catching abilities, his forte. However, I don't fault you for riding the hot hand. Gordon has looked mediocre and Woody scored an uncharacteristic 2 TD last week.

Peep Game said:
I'm kinda iffy on Rodgers vs the Hawks without Bulaga, even at home, and even with Seattle shaky without Kam. It's either that, or Flacco at Oakland.
Click to expand...
Rodgers is still slotted as a top-3 fantasy QB in Week 2, for most analysts' boards. If you had an option like Bradford or Tanny, I'd reconsider starting Rodgers but Flacco gets me less excited than bedding a severely overweight woman. Despite Baltimore's premium OL and a favorable Oakland match-up, Ravens are lacking in edge playmakers.
 
Last edited:
Cabeza Papi 
laugh.gif
 
JohnnyRedStorm said:
You drafted Rodgers in the first or second round for a reason, if you don't feel comfortable starting him for 15 games, you wasted a draft pick.
Click to expand...

No lie, dude in my league picked ARod with the 2nd pick and just traded him for Wheaton and Randle. Everyone was clowning him in group chat lol
 
ChampCruThik said:
Peep Game said:
I'm kinda iffy on Rodgers vs the Hawks without Bulaga, even at home, and even with Seattle shaky without Kam. It's either that, or Flacco at Oakland.
Click to expand...
Rodgers is still slotted as a top-3 fantasy QB in Week 2, for most analysts' boards. If you had an option like Bradford or Tanny, I'd reconsider starting Rodgers but Flacco doesn't gets me less excited than bedding a severely overweight woman. Despite Baltimore's premium OL and a favorable Oakland match-up, Ravens are lacking in edge playmakers.
Click to expand...
Nice analogy except for the fact Peep exclusively dates overweight women.

No lie, dude in my league picked ARod with the 2nd pick and just traded him for Wheaton and Randle. Everyone was clowning him in group chat lol
Click to expand...
that's gotta be vetoed man :x
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom