Jordan 6 Infrared 2014 Legit Check!

pain11

Banned
119
16
Joined
Mar 22, 2015
Note: This is a different shoe than my other infrared 2014 legit checks.

He said he took the last 7 pictures with a crappy phone so the jumpan might look blurry and distorted as well as some of the other last 7 pictures. But now he took new pictures of the jumpans.

Sorry i dont think he gave me a 3m shot with flash. Maybe the very bright blurry white one.
 
Last edited:
Thanks timmy, you were very helpful! Second opinions please?
 
Last edited:
1s and 4s are my strong suit but my take is these are these are off....why does MJ look 4 months pregnant in one Jumpman and that he's lost a foot in another? .... The back tab red looks off from the other 'infrareds' of the sole and lace lock...why are the single digits centered differently (the 8 is justified right to the U.S. but the 7 is justified left to UK)?
 
Last edited:
1s and 4s are my strong suit but my take is these are these are off....why does MJ look 4 months pregnant in one Jumpman and that he's lost a foot in another? .... The back tab red looks off from the other 'infrareds' of the sole and lace lock...why are the single digits centered differently (the 8 is justified right to the U.S. but the 7 is justified left to UK)?
http://cdn.sneakernews.com/wp-conte...-6-black-infrared-release-date-02-570x570.jpg

if you take a look at these infrareds from sneakernews theyre the same where the 8 is right

http://cdn.sneakernews.com/wp-conte...-6-black-infrared-release-date-02-570x570.jpg

He said he took the last 7 pictures with a crappy phone so the jumpan might look blurry and distorte as well as some of the other last 7 pictures.

but according to that picture the size tag picture seems to be correct.
 
Last edited:
http://cdn.sneakernews.com/wp-conte...-6-black-infrared-release-date-02-570x570.jpg

if you take a look at these infrareds from sneakernews theyre the same where the 8 is right

http://cdn.sneakernews.com/wp-conte...-6-black-infrared-release-date-02-570x570.jpg

 
He said he took the last 7 pictures with a crappy phone so the jumpan might look blurry and distorte as well as some of the other last 7 pictures.
 
but according to that picture the size tag picture seems to be correct.

Got it on the tag ... But the Jumpman still seems off. Here's Nike release for these and the third pic below text shows the Jumpman which is closest to the left shoe (7 pics down - the pic with lace locks removed) but even with that the Jumpman is off from the other Jumpman. but if you feel comfortable with the 'stretching/distortion' explanation go with the deal.

[http://m.nike.com/us/en_us/launch/c...ack-infrared23?ref=https://www.google.com/URL]http://m.nike.com/us/en_us/launch/c...-black-infrared23?ref=https://www.google.com/[/URL]
 
Got it on the tag ... But the Jumpman still seems off. Here's Nike release for these and the third pic below text shows the Jumpman which is closest to the left shoe (7 pics down - the pic with lace locks removed) but even with that the Jumpman is off from the other Jumpman. but if you feel comfortable with the 'stretching/distortion' explanation go with the deal.

[http://m.nike.com/us/en_us/launch/c...ack-infrared23?ref=https://www.google.com/URL]http://m.nike.com/us/en_us/launch/c...-black-infrared23?ref=https://www.google.com/[/URL]
i always see different jumpans in different shoes though lol. but youre right ill wait for more replies though before buying. the thing is when you look at nikes site shoe jumpan the stomach is still out a bit and the leg looks lost a bit (skinny)..so it just so happens in the shoe i posted they look even more exaggerated..theyre the same jumpan shape as the nike shoes but more exaggerated..atleast theyre not different though.
 
Last edited:
Got it on the tag ... But the Jumpman still seems off. Here's Nike release for these and the third pic below text shows the Jumpman which is closest to the left shoe (7 pics down - the pic with lace locks removed) but even with that the Jumpman is off from the other Jumpman. but if you feel comfortable with the 'stretching/distortion' explanation go with the deal.


[http://m.nike.com/us/en_us/launch/c/2014-11/air-jordan-6-retro-black-infrared23?ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fhttp://m.nike.com/us/en_us/launch/c...ack-infrared23?ref=https://www.google.com/URL]http://m.nike.com/us/en_us/launch/c...-black-infrared23?ref=https://www.google.com/[/URL[/URL]]
i always see different jumpans in different shoes though lol. but youre right ill wait for more replies though before buying. the thing is when you look at nikes site shoe jumpan the stomach is still out a bit and the leg looks lost a bit (skinny)..so it just so happens in the shoe i posted they look even more exaggerated..theyre the same jumpan shape as the nike shoes but more exaggerated..atleast theyre not different though.
don't listen to him
 
As far as I can tell from those pics they are legit.
 
Last edited:
Hey I have a day lined up to meet him, I was just wondering one thing about the box. does the white size tag on the upper part of the box matter? it doesn't match with other ones..although I do live in Canada and the box doesn't have the MSRP price label..could the white label with the price be a replacement of the MSRP and is actually authentic (authentic size tag)? what im just asking lol is if the box looks authentic

MSRP usually says 185 but since my are canadian dollars maybe they decided to make another tag that says 235

sorry for the bad english, its not my first language
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom